Y
HN Search
Hacker News Search
new
|
comments
|
top
|
jobs
groby_b
searching PlanetScale…
1.
▲
2.
▲
3.
▲
4.
▲
5.
▲
6.
▲
41 ms
·
811.
▲
by
groby_b
3y ago
As opposed to overpaying for things that aren't actually helping you, but sure make the insurance company happy? Source: Am USian. (Also worth noting that you can add private health care to your menu. If you balk at the cost, welcome t
812.
▲
by
groby_b
3y ago
ChatGPT also believes the moon is made out of green cheese. (Less snarky: It hallucinates an answer. It can't do math. Do not rely on ChatGPT for math. Or facts.)
813.
▲
by
groby_b
3y ago
You might want to acquire reading skills. I am talking about business communications in a regulated sector.
814.
▲
by
groby_b
3y ago
This depends on your area, and your ISP. If, say, you use AT&T and you need Internet for your job (WFH?), redundant Internet is crucial. It's not exactly "minutes" they are out. (Their outages states are often "meh,
815.
▲
by
groby_b
3y ago
If you are working in banking, you know you are supposed to archive comms. If you then knowingly don't archive, you are deliberately sidestepping existing regulations. That's a much stronger issue than "if you've got
816.
▲
by
groby_b
3y ago
Yes, they are. Well beyond banks - it's a SOX compliance question for any publicly traded company.
817.
▲
by
groby_b
3y ago
Not retaining written comms is evading regulations - "retain written comms" is one, and using Signal/WhatsApp is evading it. Nobody working in banking is unaware of the written comms rules. Nobody using Signal or WhatsApp i
818.
▲
by
groby_b
3y ago
Yes. Has been for a while. Before that, listservs. (OK, they're still with us) Science is a team sport, and so it is grounded in communication. The faster, the better.
819.
▲
by
groby_b
3y ago
The problem here might be LastPass, not password managers.
820.
▲
by
groby_b
3y ago
Or... you could just use a password manager. With a few high-value keywords (your email - it's universal password access for most of us!) kept out of it. If you've need additional security (or the feeling thereof), keep it on an I
821.
▲
by
groby_b
3y ago
"It makes it seem as though there was just the Good side that had all the answers all along" That, right there, is where so many people went wrong and what was blatantly exploited by grifters up and down the chain. The side of sci
822.
▲
by
groby_b
3y ago
You're referring to politics. The science was pretty clear the entire time.
823.
▲
by
groby_b
3y ago
Emotionally, it was horrible. Societally, it was depressing to see that we'll never be able to tackle any true large problems, we can't even agree on wearing a piece of paper to protect fellow humans. But scientifically? Yeah, I&#
824.
▲
by
groby_b
3y ago
I'm sure you're trying to say something, but until you spell it out, we're left to guess. If what you'd like to say is that you think credit risk and ESG aren't related, well, Fitch disagrees. And rightfully so. Lac
825.
▲
by
groby_b
3y ago
"I was disappointed, everyone seemed normal" In a total plot twist, you can make a lot of money without constantly obsessing about it. You can even be "a bit Epicurean hedonist", enjoy your money, and still make more. (A
826.
▲
by
groby_b
3y ago
A company that is on track to reach even remotely close to FANG status has already taken on significant investments. From, by necessity, many investors in the Bay Area. That means the board wouldn't put requirements on investors, and t
827.
▲
by
groby_b
3y ago
I am so sorry your university fleeced you without giving you a decent education in your chosen field.
828.
▲
by
groby_b
3y ago
This may be a hard pill to swallow, but science isn't a "more is better" game. It ultimately requires being embedded in a culture that, to quote Popper, "seeks truths that are difficult and interesting". From that v
829.
▲
by
groby_b
3y ago
"And who knows how many of them happened during the past millennia. Geologists. And the answer is "none" for the past 25 or so millenia, and "one" since Toba. Also, unless you've had supervolcanoes go off in yo
830.
▲
by
groby_b
3y ago
If there is one universal truth in trading, it's that MarketWatch will deliver bad takes. And given the small mistake in their previous headline, it's probably a great idea to check the original report, which coincidentally isn&#x
831.
▲
by
groby_b
3y ago
Uh. That's 87 pages. I'd like to have better treemaps, I don't like it 87 pages much. Mind pointing to a particular example?
832.
▲
by
groby_b
3y ago
That argument is, of course, nonsense. First, private and public censorship are fundamentally different due to power balances. The government is enjoined from censorship except in very carefully defined circumstances. Private entities are a
833.
▲
by
groby_b
3y ago
Sigh. A lot of the arguments here amount to "there is no heuristic that's 100% correct, so heuristics are useless". That's not how that works. TA ultimately is supposed to give you insight into how the overall market is
834.
▲
by
groby_b
3y ago
https://chromewebstore.google.com/detail/habonpimjphpdnmcfka... (or https://github.com/tjhorner/archivebox-exporter for source) Pushes your history to ArchiveBox, which does the heavy lifting stor
835.
▲
by
groby_b
3y ago
Same feeling. "Dark Sun" feels very much like the grinding of an axe. But yes, "Making Of" is an absolute classic. Not just if you care about the field, but if you care about good science writing at all.
836.
▲
by
groby_b
3y ago
It is, however, added friction, and that's 90% of the security game. Every additional layer helps. (And a corp email account adds a paper trail, at the very least)
837.
▲
by
groby_b
3y ago
> If I achieve something, there should be cash money in my pocket above having done nothing There is cash money in your pocket in advance, so you do something. That's what a salary is. The problem lies with the company not firing yo
838.
▲
by
groby_b
3y ago
> Important decisions aren't made in a meeting unless at least one person has thought through the options beforehand and come prepared to explain the pros and cons of each and why their recommendation makes sense. Uh, yes. If people
839.
▲
by
groby_b
3y ago
There'd be much to say about your points, but... you're missing the entire point of the article and rhapsodize on the title instead. Because the article isn't, at all, using the word "theatre" in a derogatory sense.
840.
▲
by
groby_b
3y ago
Sure, but that's still usually limited runway compared to getting funding. Yes, there are cases of spouses supporting a decade of work to get something off the ground. Yes, some people make enough to afford dumping it all into a startu
More ›