grkvlt

110 ms·

1261.
by grkvlt 13y ago
Except AOL provide high-speed broadband subscriptions now, just like all other ISPs...
1262.
by grkvlt 13y ago
Well, this partnership has been known for a while now, certainly before Snowden. The _original_ deal was made during World War II (the 1943 BRUSA [1] agreement) and was then superseded by the UKUSA [2] agreement (or Five Eyes) which also in
1263.
by grkvlt 13y ago
Not true - you're measuring the wrong thing. The X that is improving with practice is 'Being Married to person P' and statistically, the longer you are married to a particular person, the more likely it is to stay that way. [
1264.
by grkvlt 13y ago
I don't expect offering children a preference is a particularly useful thing to do. In all except a tiny minority of cases (where the person has some form of mental illness, or possibly genetic abnormalities) gender and sex are equival
1265.
by grkvlt 13y ago
That's the joke.
1266.
by grkvlt 13y ago
Actually, it is _exactly_ what 'to sue for' means. See, for example, the usage in 'to sue for peace' [1]. [1] http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Suing_for_peace
1267.
by grkvlt 13y ago
> It may be true that the Russian government does not give these rights to it's citizens, or that these citizens yield these rights to the Russian government. That isn't what the parent is talking about. He's asserting tha
1268.
by grkvlt 13y ago
Agree, the ability to clone the repository should be a highly available/easily discoverable action. It will generally be the next thing the user wants to do (perhaps after forking) on first visiting a repository... Also, the idea that
1269.
by grkvlt 13y ago
> in France, there is almost nothing in computer sciences What about INRIA? "Inria is a public research body dedicated to digital science and technology" - http://www.inria.fr/en/‎
1270.
by grkvlt 13y ago
> Granted, selling the vulnerability is illegal Really? That's exactly what you're doing with Facebook - selling a vulnerability to them, which they then pay you for. So, disclosing to some third party ought also to be fine. The moralit
1271.
by grkvlt 13y ago
No they don't and no it isn't.
1272.
by grkvlt 13y ago
Minus five years? See this HST image from 2008: http://hubblesite.org/newscenter/archive/releases/2008/39/im...
1273.
by grkvlt 14y ago
I reported this to Google about the same time, in June last year, and got a similar response. Interestingly, I published some notes on the issue almost exactly one week before the duosecurity researchers 'discovered' it ;) http://grkvlt.bl
1274.
by grkvlt 14y ago
Yes, and that is _NOT_ illegal. You're quite free to unlock your phone after the contract runs out, or if you pay your carrier the fees to unlock it, in the case above that would probably be the $400 dollar difference between your price and
1275.
by grkvlt 14y ago
Yes, but the commands are normally interpreted differently in English. For example, 'cp A B' is copy from A to B that is, copying source A to destination B. But 'ln A B' could easily be interpreted as link A to B or make A a link to B
1276.
by grkvlt 14y ago
If you register and log in, you get a watermark-free image. It even suggests this on the image info page...
1277.
by grkvlt 14y ago
> Why would you not want to save what you are doing? Because the document is public, and you don't want work-in-progress to be shared until it is complete?