grif-fin

13 ms·

31.
by grif-fin 10y ago
You are right when taking into account the mobile users safari is way more than 3.5%. As I said currently we are not targeting mobile users. We think a specific app would be required which having it on both iOS and Android requires resource
32.
by grif-fin 10y ago
I think these three should cover the story I want to know: - Where did the idea come from? - What was your ideal expectation after launch? - What went wrong? (was it the product or wrong judgment of market demand)
33.
by grif-fin 10y ago
True, Ballotter very much matches the political debating scene but it is whatever users make it to be. To narrow it down to political area we would need to know many politicians to provide the content. We do not know any politicians willing
34.
by grif-fin 10y ago
We are aware of the issues on mobile. We think an app would be required which we will launch if more debates are made via Desktop users as we think they are the major users. What do you think?
35.
by grif-fin 10y ago
It is fixed for desktop. Mobile may face issues due to network difference but a new version for mobile is a possibility if debates come through :) It is not OSS yet. May go OSS later though.
36.
by grif-fin 10y ago
Fantastic. The sample is prerecorded. Any new debate will have the cheer and boo with much lower volume.
37.
by grif-fin 10y ago
The number next to thumbs ups indicates the votes each debater has got from the spectators.
38.
by grif-fin 10y ago
Webrtc is growing and improving everyday! We are aware of the current issue. Will resolve and update this comment. Out of interest how would you have done your idea differently?
39.
by grif-fin 10y ago
You are right, by using WebRTC we are ignoring Safari users. Since this is a prototype we are looking forward to get majority browser users involved (Safari is around %3.5).
40.
by grif-fin 10y ago
Fixed.
41.
by grif-fin 10y ago
Thanks, will fix it.
42.
by grif-fin 10y ago
We have created Ballotter as an online (live/recorded) video debating platform to bring the discussions worth sharing on an online stage. Ballotter has just came online and is at the beta stage. We hope to gather a collection of amazin
43.
Show HN: Ballotter, an Online Video Debating Platform for Our Discussions(ballotter.com)
30 points by grif-fin 10y ago|27 comments
44.
by grif-fin 10y ago
We have created Ballotter as an online (live/recorded) video debating platform to bring the discussions worth sharing on an online stage. Ballotter has just came online and is at the beta stage. We hope to gather a collection of amazin
45.
Show HN: Ballotter, an Online Video Debating Platform for Our Discussions(ballotter.com)
1 points by grif-fin 10y ago|1 comments
46.
by grif-fin 10y ago
We have created Ballotter as an online (live/recorded) video debating platform to bring the discussions worth sharing on an online stage. Ballotter has just came online and is at the beta stage. We hope to gather a collection of amazin
47.
Show HN: Ballotter, an Online Video Debating Platform for Our Discussions(ballotter.com)
4 points by grif-fin 10y ago|1 comments
48.
by grif-fin 10y ago
Chrome on pc here...I clicked on Jasmine tea go to product - I get a white page with log errors regarding amazon.com.
49.
by grif-fin 10y ago
I agree. We are wrapping up a beta version and soon will are hoping to publish it on Show HN. We are privately sharing the link to our circle around and it would be amazing if we can get more opinions on it. Please let me know here if you a
50.
by grif-fin 10y ago
Sorry but this comment is not answering the question.
51.
by grif-fin 10y ago
I am currently on no side to be convinced from. I just simply do not know and getting others opinion. It was in one go except this comment, why? :)
52.
by grif-fin 10y ago
The point of getting it right on first recorded video is interesting but again what about people using snapchat? do they re-take? Or is it the seriousness and comments require more attention so users may be more picky...
53.
by grif-fin 10y ago
So are we saying due to the fear of people on Chatroulette we can no longer expand the technological tools to comment? :) How come people on Periscope are fine?
54.
by grif-fin 10y ago
If you do hide your face then the person you are replying gets the hint that this person that kind which chooses the option of video instead of text and hides himself/herself which indicates to me not a bright fellow. Regarding the vid
55.
by grif-fin 10y ago
But don't you think it may reduce the trolling in comments as there is a less likely hood of one knowing when his/her face is showing more responsibility comes with it? Also wondering, do you think we will never have video comment
56.
Ask HN: What happened with video commenting?
1 points by grif-fin 10y ago|10 comments
57.
Ask HN: Thoughts about our video streaming debating app?
1 points by grif-fin 10y ago|4 comments
58.
Ask HN: The acceptable UI quality for a startup project at beta test stage?
3 points by grif-fin 10y ago|2 comments
59.
Ask HN: How are big players handling large number of live video broadcasts?
3 points by grif-fin 10y ago|0 comments
60.
by grif-fin 10y ago
I guess it would be correct to say: Many reasons and very hard for me with my knowledge to judge which ones had the most effect. But since it is an interesting question I will throw a guess at it. I think reading through the history we may

More ›