gregoriol

9 ms·

121.
by gregoriol 1y ago
The amount of tools needed to process that junk and make newly usable stuff would be huge and not worth it. Not even talking about the energy needed to take the junk there and land it safely. The article is talking about rocket bodies mostl
122.
by gregoriol 1y ago
If you are really paranoid to that point, you probably wouldn't follow NIST recommendations for encryption algorithms as it is part of the Department of Commerce of the United States, even more in today's context.
123.
by gregoriol 1y ago
Unconventional as in "you can't disable Google Analytics cookies from the cookie banner"?
124.
by gregoriol 1y ago
Yeah, I don't think labor is a problem here since the people willing to make this happen somehow also found 1) money to buy these racks, 2) many times 256 SIM cards, 3) a few locations in NYC
125.
by gregoriol 1y ago
The user doesn't care about implementation details: it works or it doesn't work
126.
by gregoriol 1y ago
The fact that it works well in good conditions doesn't make it good. It's the unexpected situations that determine if someone lives or dies.
127.
by gregoriol 1y ago
Matrix would be a better alternative
128.
by gregoriol 1y ago
Long time Apple user advice: don't update before .1 version if you use your mac for important things.
129.
by gregoriol 1y ago
It's annoying me that Apple has called it "iPhone Air" and not "iPhone 17 Air", this is Apple creating (again) confusion for every tech person in the future
130.
by gregoriol 1y ago
I'm using it, thanks so much for making it :-) It should have been part of the swift base tools, it is very useful.
131.
by gregoriol 1y ago
Local Swift packages are indeed improving the experience a little bit: better version management, less xcode crashes, slightly more explicit errors, but still highly troublesome. It really feels like Apple's teams are not using any of
132.
by gregoriol 1y ago
From my experience, about 20-30% of the packages are not working with swiftpm, either because they don't have a Package.swift file, or because it is not compatible with up-to-date developer tools. On many projects, I had to fork a few
133.
by gregoriol 1y ago
Better than the "current" future
134.
by gregoriol 1y ago
This is really sad, because the replacement, Swift Package Manager, is really crap: it lacks some useful features (an "outdated" command, meaningful commandline output, ...), is buggy as hell in xcode (most of the time xcode just
135.
by gregoriol 1y ago
The pilot could eject at mostly any time, not if the plane starts spinning uncontrollably though. Also, the plane can become very dangerous to what may be on the ground: if the pilot looses control and must eject it may not always be in a s
136.
by gregoriol 1y ago
Depends on how you use it, but with intensive use like 2+ charge cycles a day 7 days a week, and long times connected to charger makes 2+ years quite old.
137.
by gregoriol 1y ago
You could also use the ZoneMinder (open-source), it supports many video/image streams from cameras and provides detections/alerting
138.
by gregoriol 1y ago
He is right though. The facts are that the thing has been bought by people for show, and not used for anything useful at all ever. This says quite much about the buyers and the product.
139.
by gregoriol 1y ago
It's hard to find reasons to protect someone trying to install a shady app. Using that one reason to kill the possibility to install third-party apps for everyone is shady.
140.
by gregoriol 1y ago
No, the average Janes and Joes don't enable side-loading: it's a toggle, not enabled by default, it's in an advanced setting pane and it's good as it is. Google has been controlling what is installed through their Store
141.
by gregoriol 1y ago
The Apple Vision solves no problems, like the Apple Watch, they are just toys.
142.
by gregoriol 1y ago
It has lost through traffic but gained quite some tourism to see the bridge, it's a win situation
143.
by gregoriol 1y ago
With infinite resources, you can serve infinite users. Until it's gone.
144.
by gregoriol 1y ago
Please don't call it "gmap" as it is a very commonly known name for another service; maybe "gitmap" or something that conveys the use would fit better?
145.
by gregoriol 1y ago
In each of these activities you listed, you know it's for yourself only. The case described in the post is very different: it suggests rambling in a place where others are, but just don't care about what you say.
146.
by gregoriol 1y ago
"with no expectation that anyone else will read them" => this is depressing, why would anyone ramble (or do anything actually) with this in mind?
147.
by gregoriol 1y ago
You can still bundle them, maybe you even should. Webpack still does a good job. Can also remove unused parts.
148.
by gregoriol 1y ago
So if it has been acquired by Apple, it's a failure, isn't it? Most things acquired by Apple get unmaintained or change completely, or disappear. Being "open-source" here doesn't bring any guarantees to any third-pa
149.
by gregoriol 1y ago
How many news did we get recently about such "tech" products becoming disabled because 2G was gone, because the app was gone, ... Road lights should last 20+ years, no app/connected system will last that long.
150.
by gregoriol 1y ago
That seems an over-engineered, highly expensive and complicated to maintain on a road-lifetime scale system

More ›