Y
HN Search
Hacker News Search
new
|
comments
|
top
|
jobs
greggoB
searching PlanetScale…
1.
▲
2.
▲
3.
▲
4.
▲
5.
▲
6.
▲
4 ms
·
31.
▲
by
greggoB
1mo ago
Does 'registration' introduce anything physically different? Or could they be completely interoperable?
32.
▲
by
greggoB
1mo ago
I got a 3060 ti for like $900 at that time <melting-face-emoji>
33.
▲
by
greggoB
1mo ago
> So... did they list the "0GB" racks with removed ram cheaper you ask? Could this be an indication that there's a supply shortage/price increase of the remaining components in the rack? Or do you interpret it as peop
34.
▲
by
greggoB
1mo ago
I believe they've been building them like crazy since covid, but it takes a looong time for them to come online (like 5-10 years?)
35.
▲
by
greggoB
1mo ago
My understanding is that it's fundamentally a fab capacity limit. At a given node size/technology (think 7nm, etc) they can only output so many wafers. If AI data centers are generating enormous demand for memory, then that's
36.
▲
by
greggoB
1mo ago
The alternative being having LLM responses be in the form of negging? Or did I not understand the reference?
37.
▲
by
greggoB
1mo ago
> As long as you are consciously aware This is a strong assumption; we know that people tend to be overly confident about their mental states. That conscious awareness will last all of two minutes for 99.9% of the population, with everyo
38.
▲
by
greggoB
1mo ago
Agreed about balance, but you lost me after that - I really struggle to see a serious concern about society over-eagerly shutting down ideas, not when we live in a world in which all manner of ideas - including those that are disruptive and
39.
▲
by
greggoB
1mo ago
Isn't AI's infinite willingness and lack of inhibition sort of the thing that people are increasingly voicing concern over? Put differently, maybe there's something fundamentally unhealthy to having a "discussion" w
40.
▲
by
greggoB
1mo ago
Yeah so this would certainly be unacceptable, especially for NYC tax-payers struggling to get by I'm sure. My point is that the article leaves open room that the situation in SF isn't necessarily only due to unscrupulous behavio
41.
▲
by
greggoB
1mo ago
That's clearly not the point - it's not a function of everyone knowing, but rather a function of the attempt to cover it up. Waving defeatism as some kind of universal truth is neither particularly enlightening nor useful.
42.
▲
by
greggoB
1mo ago
In my experience, it's not so typical in the 3rd world to provide such a detailed level of transparency to be critiqued.
43.
▲
by
greggoB
1mo ago
It's not clear to me that this is a result of corruption - the article notes that a big driver is overtime pay, and that SF has struggled with hiring in recent years, which could be a legitimate cause. Also note about the mayor: "
44.
▲
by
greggoB
2mo ago
This sounds like the basis of a scam involving a company called Clark that I had the displeasure of dealing with in the past. From what I understand, they had/have an operation running in Spain, the purpose of which is to get people si
45.
▲
by
greggoB
2mo ago
> creative and high quality generative AI content So high quality I can certainly acknowledge because indeed the output from these models can be indistinguishable from human generated content. However, I am curious to know what you mean
46.
▲
by
greggoB
2mo ago
> There is a grey area here of calls from businesses which the customer is signed up to Pretty much exactly how it is in Switzerland. I once had a rather unpleasant experience with my old internet provider (Sunrise) where I asked the tel
47.
▲
by
greggoB
2mo ago
I think we're slightly below average with 20 vacation days per year as the legal minimum (compared to 25 on average in the EU?). Still significantly higher than the US, and with notably higher income/GDP per capita, so indeed it d
48.
▲
by
greggoB
2mo ago
Understood, I've read the guidelines and will endeavour to follow them.
49.
▲
by
greggoB
2mo ago
[flagged]
50.
▲
by
greggoB
2mo ago
Yeah I see there are a bunch of other comments confirming so
51.
▲
by
greggoB
2mo ago
> To do so would be a breach of fiduciary duty Is openAI not technically still a nonprofit? In any case, this argument doesn't make sense, it's like saying Boeing didn't have a choice wrt the 737 Max because had they waite
52.
▲
by
greggoB
2mo ago
> we need to be vegetarian In my experience it's been vegan even :P And yes, agreed, this is indeed counterproductive virtue signalling.
53.
▲
by
greggoB
2mo ago
Hard to tell what you're specifically bothered by - is it a focus on emissions that aren't specifically fossil fuels burned for electricity, or "shame, shame garbage", as you put it? In either case, I think we can be exp
54.
▲
by
greggoB
2mo ago
> People who complain about aviation do more harm than good. I find this a bit hard to swallow. It speaks to a sense of impunity wrt emissions for a demographic that very arguably drives much of the rest of the way energy is consumed. It
55.
▲
by
greggoB
2mo ago
Transformative implies neither good nor bad. You started this thought in your original comment re social media and how that's now possibly perceived as a net negative, despite the original aims of its inventors. Is there something some
56.
▲
by
greggoB
2mo ago
Strange, I don't remember seeing the blog post link there - I must have just skipped over that. In general I found some parts provided interesting info (e.g. Kagi bought a t-shirt producer, Kagi started out as an AI company in 2018), b
57.
▲
by
greggoB
2mo ago
> If you ask them what guarantees you have that they won't someday decide to sell your search history, their response will be "well, it doesn't make financial sense for us to do so. Now drop it" and ban you. Can you p
58.
▲
by
greggoB
2mo ago
> We are very good at inventing entire people out of single opinions we read Can you clarify what this is supposed to mean?
59.
▲
by
greggoB
2mo ago
I don't understand this sentence.
60.
▲
by
greggoB
2mo ago
The comment actually describes a known social process, with a reasonable base assumption given that said leadership has shown a pattern in this regard. Just throwing out debate terms in response seems not so serious, tbh.
More ›