Y
HN Search
Hacker News Search
new
|
comments
|
top
|
jobs
gregd
searching PlanetScale…
1.
▲
2.
▲
3.
▲
4.
▲
5.
▲
6.
▲
12 ms
·
151.
▲
by
gregd
7y ago
What laws exist that say an employer has to provide benefits for their employees? A lot of employers offer flexible schedules and a flex schedule can be negotiated during the hiring process.
152.
▲
by
gregd
7y ago
Going from Contractor to Employee status adds 20% - 30% in labor costs. Things like Workers Comp, PTO, unemployment insurance, etc. that companies are forced to pay. There is indeed a "loophole" or labor discount with ICs.
153.
▲
by
gregd
7y ago
I don't disagree that our healthcare system is a joke. But working full-time for a company in no way, shape or form guarantees that you'll get health benefits too. AB5 also doesn't force employers to provide healthcare.
154.
▲
by
gregd
7y ago
I would assume certain industries require special permitting or licensing for LLCs.
155.
▲
by
gregd
7y ago
"Ultimately we're forcing a bunch of societal burden onto employers." How so?
156.
▲
by
gregd
7y ago
Because companies complain that it adds 20% - 30% to their labor costs.
157.
▲
by
gregd
7y ago
There are few exceptions to the new law, and even the exceptions have to pass the Borello Test.
158.
▲
by
gregd
7y ago
Being downvoted for having an opinion? Good god people.
159.
▲
by
gregd
7y ago
That's exactly what they have to do and some are. However, forming and running an LLC can have it's own headaches depending on the type of business you're running. In some industries, running as an LLC would cost you more t
160.
▲
by
gregd
7y ago
I totally get and understand being scared at losing part of one's income, especially in place like California, but I agree with you. This is a step in the right direction and removes the ability for companies to continue to exploit 10
161.
▲
by
gregd
7y ago
It removes a mechanism that allows companies to exploit workers by treating them like employees, but considering them legally as ICs (no Workman's Comp, at-will, etc.) and giving them a 1099 form at the end of the year.
162.
▲
by
gregd
7y ago
How is me having an issue with SO overall, any different then someone not have any issues with SO overall? One requires hard evidence and one does not?
163.
▲
by
gregd
7y ago
"I have no problem with x. Prove to me that you have a problem with x.", seems entirely reasonable to you?
164.
▲
by
gregd
7y ago
I'm in the top 2% on ServerFault to this day. I remember interacting with you on numerous questions. I'm GregD on the Stack sites. I totally understand the limits that had to be set on the low bar for quality content. In those
165.
▲
by
gregd
7y ago
"post a link so we can judge" is precisely the attitude on SO that I find reprehensible.
166.
▲
by
gregd
7y ago
I stopped participating in Stack Overflow and Server Fault a number of years ago. Something happened on the way to its popularity, especially on Server Fault. Questions were being asked and a number of highly rated users were closing them
167.
▲
by
gregd
7y ago
I'm utterly dumbfounded at someone who manages people, stating this. I budgeted for training on a per employee basis when I created my yearly budgets.
168.
▲
by
gregd
7y ago
You're absolutely right and I corrected myself with a comment. I don't know why but I can't delete my original comment nor can I edit it.
169.
▲
by
gregd
7y ago
You're right. I corrected myself with a comment because I cannot edit my original post. That will teach me to make comments before the caffeine has kicked in.
170.
▲
by
gregd
7y ago
I lost the ability to edit my comments. I meant to say warm dead...not cold.
171.
▲
by
gregd
7y ago
As someone who was once an NREMT-B in the US, we were taught that someone isn't dead, until they're cold dead. I haven't read the article yet, but I assume they kept her warm.
172.
▲
by
gregd
7y ago
So, a carrier lies to a consumer about network coverage to lock them into a contract, with no way out? Sounds like everyday, corporate America.
173.
▲
by
gregd
7y ago
Over and above the policy that a Corporation has over your phone (personal or otherwise) when you access their stuff, nobody talks about the potential liability that can open up to your personal device during an e-discovery process. You cou
174.
▲
by
gregd
7y ago
This isn't that hard to understand. In order to access corporate email systems, you have two choices generally. Either you use a Corporate Owned device or you use a Personal Device but allow Corporate to do what they want to it. In e
175.
▲
by
gregd
7y ago
I grew up in the heart of the Emerald Triangle. I can assure you that no 'hippy' is doing this. Their relationship with this plant is far different than everyone else's.
176.
▲
When I Took My Zipcar into the Wilderness
(theatlantic.com)
4 points
by
gregd
7y ago
|
0 comments
177.
▲
by
gregd
7y ago
I've been working remotely for 8 years now. I'm truly interested in understanding why you think it's such a bad idea. I mean I used to have to commute through downtown Portland, Oregon at rush hour. Just being able to leave
178.
▲
by
gregd
7y ago
I've been working remotely for 8 years now for a couple of companies. Currently work in an environment where I'm one of the few devs working remotely, where the rest share an office. I'm trying to figure out if you've a
179.
▲
by
gregd
7y ago
I can't tell you how many times I've never even gotten the courtesy of a response after interviews...even though I've checked in with them to find out where they were in their process. The other thing that gets me, is not lis
180.
▲
by
gregd
7y ago
It takes me almost 2 hrs to recover (i.e.: reengage) after meetings...totally unrelated to coding or whatever project I'm working on.
More ›