gregable

9 ms·

61.
by gregable 5y ago
That's a common response. The problem is that it ignores the fact that San Francisco needs those people to fill jobs that need doing. https://nyti.ms/3yuq3nX The common response to that then is then we should just rais
62.
by gregable 5y ago
Unfortunately it's never that easy. Should you be able to blast music at high volume outdoors if you pay a nuisance tax? If your wood burning stove heater makes the nearby aqi shoot up, is that ok if you pay for someone else to upgrade
63.
by gregable 5y ago
Interesting thought, but does it change anything? Each vehicle is still driven the same # of total miles and the same number of annual total miles are driven, so I'm not sure if the resulting carbon output is any different.
64.
by gregable 5y ago
Tons of other risky assets have high "interest rates". Sell puts on high volatility stocks for example.
65.
by gregable 5y ago
Also the ability to recover kinetic energy during braking which is lost with ICE engines.
66.
by gregable 5y ago
Perhaps the difference is that UBI doesn't pay you for working. In your counter-example, for the UBI to result in the same thing requires that the worker work exactly the same number of hours. UBI is usually per-person, not per hour wo
67.
by gregable 5y ago
I'm not an expert in this area. It seems like an interesting thought experiment for a transitional period to UBI+automation would be to have government pay for higher minimum wage. For example, current minimum wage is $7.25. We up this
68.
by gregable 5y ago
Tariffs usually
69.
by gregable 6y ago
One option for you might be the Brultech GreenEye monitor. They are considerably more expensive and unless they've changed a bit more of a roll-your-own on the coding side.
70.
by gregable 6y ago
Perhaps, pick your favorite number. I think it's pretty clear nobody believes fundamentals support $300 though. Was wondering why market short pressure doesn't prevent it from getting that high.
71.
by gregable 6y ago
That's what I figured might be the limiting factor. At some point, nobody wants to take the other end of the short, so it becomes impossible to short further.
72.
by gregable 6y ago
Sure, but irrational enough not to short a $6 stock priced at $300?
73.
by gregable 6y ago
I'm curious, if this is the case, why doesn't the market realize this and short sell like crazy right now, given it's clear the price isn't sustainable. That would then generate more negative price pressure and generally
74.
by gregable 6y ago
I have wondered how possible it might be to set up a few such cameras in a region and use them to triangulate meteor landing sites, maybe go find them after? I don't know how precise you could get, but it feels like if you could get d
75.
by gregable 6y ago
Perhaps partly, but the 70% increase from 2018 to 2019 can't be explained by Covid-19.
76.
by gregable 6y ago
Totally agreed. The spirit of the whole thing seemed about adventure, exploration, and fun. Unfortunately the reality of the finder seems to be a far different set of stress which I hope he eventually is able to escape from.
77.
by gregable 6y ago
I've seen instances of this before, but never one that couldn't possibly be explained in any other way. For example, getting an ad for an HBO show that I talked about. Well, HBO is pushing said show among my demographic, could eas
78.
by gregable 6y ago
The AMP javascript is served on the cdn.ampproject.org domain, not google.com.
79.
by gregable 6y ago
Signed exchanges are an extension to digital certificates, such as used for TLS. This is independent of DNS.
80.
by gregable 6y ago
Signed exchanges is actually separate spec from AMP. The browser implements it independently. There is no requirement for AMP pages to use signed exchanges nor for signed exchanges to be AMP.
81.
by gregable 6y ago
Signed exchanges guarantee that the content cannot be modified by the cache, such as ad injection. Google has never injected ads into any cache served AMP document (technically if the publisher uses AdSense, this is false, but that's n
82.
by gregable 6y ago
I believe the issue with this is that users already largely don't understand decorations in the URL. For example, the difference between a lock and an extended verification certificate bubble. Educating a user on what a bundle URL mean
83.
by gregable 6y ago
Correct. Open as in not resolved yet, but intended to be resolved in the future.
84.
by gregable 6y ago
Long term versions are now supported, so publishers can lock in a specific version. Publisher hosted copies are in the pipeline, as I referenced in the parent comment. My choice of verbiage was a bit confusing it appears.
85.
by gregable 6y ago
Technically yes, but not very practically. The domain is cookieless, so it would be difficult to even identify a specific user, other than by IP. Also, the JavaScript resource is delivered from the cache with a 1 year expiry, which means mo
86.
by gregable 6y ago
https://github.com/ampproject/amphtml/issues/25873
87.
by gregable 6y ago
That's correct. Only with the private key can one sign a Signed Exchange for the publisher. Like TLS, if you have the key you can already do quite a lot.
88.
by gregable 6y ago
The same could be said of any CDN hosted javascript library. For example: jquery. There is an open intent to implement support for publishers self-hosting the AMP library as well.
89.
by gregable 6y ago
While that's theoretically possible, the library can be inspected and does not do these things.
90.
by gregable 6y ago
There is a publisher selected expiration date as part of the signed exchange which the client inspects. The expiration also cannot be set to more than 7 days in the future on creation. This minimizes, but of course does not eliminate, this

More ›