grebc

9 ms·

1. 241.▲
   by grebc 3mo ago

   Sure, not disagreeing on that. No one says car crashes are less risky because you can dial an ambulance.
2. 242.▲
   by grebc 3mo ago

   Not talking about day to day living. Talking about activities like hiking, mountain climbing etc and people perception of safety because they have a phone signal.
3. 243.▲
   by grebc 3mo ago

   Ask claude to explain perception to you.
4. 244.▲
   by grebc 3mo ago

   I’m not sure regular internet access is changing the risk like you say, but I agree that people like connectivity and hence will do more risky things because they think it’s safer. Rescues even with EPIRB’s can still be difficult.
5. 245.▲
   by grebc 4mo ago

   I’d wager you’re more right than wrong.
6. 246.▲
   by grebc 4mo ago

   Change engineers to employees and you’re spot on.
7. 247.▲
   by grebc 4mo ago

   And the American ones are stealing and redistributing the IP of every single person who authored anything on the internet at some point.
8. 248.▲
   by grebc 4mo ago

   And you had a lot of stock to sell to bagholders.
9. 249.▲
   by grebc 4mo ago

   The only thing the people in charge care about is this: is their equity going up? Nothing else matters like results or revenue. Quaint concept those.
10. 250.▲
    by grebc 4mo ago

    Headlines is what matters at the executive and board level. Start measuring things and they might not be able to spin a story to sell. For a large part of society we have management in leadership positions.
11. 251.▲
    by grebc 4mo ago

    I’d not want to be responsible for the KYC/AML checks on your transactions. Banks go out of their way for HNW individuals, which it sounds like you are with 3 seperate residences in 3 different countries, I’d check to see if you qualif
12. 252.▲
    by grebc 4mo ago

    Unless you’re on vacation what reason is there for your IP to be on a separate continent to the billing address attached to a credit card? From the POV of all the people in the payment processing chain.
13. 253.▲
    by grebc 4mo ago

    Haha I like this!
14. 254.▲
    by grebc 4mo ago

    Same. Used to publish some good stuff 10+ years ago.
15. 255.▲
    by grebc 4mo ago

    They banned exporting bad cryptography algorithms/code 30 years ago too. People just love to talk about anything that tickling their fancies. It’s all a fugazi.
16. 256.▲
    by grebc 4mo ago

    Good luck! No one was really discussing in a EU context though.
17. 257.▲
    by grebc 4mo ago

    I meant free as in free market but yes continue the incoherence.
18. 258.▲
    by grebc 4mo ago

    Regulations apply to all markets. Crying you can’t afford something doesn’t mean it’s not free.
19. 259.▲
    by grebc 4mo ago

    You’re free to buy said vacant property/ies and lease them out at rates or your choosing.
20. 260.▲
    by grebc 4mo ago

    Harming others is a stretch. You’re also assuming every vacancy has this pigeon holed financial setup. A LOT of commercial property is freehold. I’m honestly at a bit of a loss that people feel they can tell others what to do with their pro
21. 261.▲
    by grebc 4mo ago

    The only people who I’ve ever known to use tex are honours students & academics. Comedy gold saying that’s work .
22. 262.▲
    by grebc 4mo ago

    I already intimated your assumptions are incorrect. Markets clear at a price, pay that price. It’s just not the one you want.
23. 263.▲
    by grebc 4mo ago

    No one is getting that law across the line in any sane country, I’m not even sure why the conversation has veered this far off-topic. Suddenly because some people here do not like commercial vacancies all of a sudden laws are changing so
24. 264.▲
    by grebc 4mo ago

    Way to change the goal posts to suit.
25. 265.▲
    by grebc 4mo ago

    What’s that got to do with a bunch of empty buildings that people in this thread do not own?
26. 266.▲
    by grebc 4mo ago

    As stated earlier: it’s a free market and you’re free to make an offer of sale or lease to utilise the space.
27. 267.▲
    by grebc 4mo ago

    The error is you think you as a non-interested party you can tell people what to do. No one’s outlined a scenario where the bank or the owner are violating some law/regulation.
28. 268.▲
    by grebc 4mo ago

    Thinking doesn’t disappear because of OpenAI’s shitty LLM’s. It certainly disappear for their customers however.
29. 269.▲
    by grebc 4mo ago

    You’re stating the outcome - the property is worth less - without understanding how people buy/sell said property. And asking why others don’t agree? The article outlines the methods used for the most part to the best of my knowledge,
30. 270.▲
    by grebc 4mo ago

    Your fictional scenario doesn’t make sense either? Why should it warrant a serious reply.