grayhatter

6 ms·

31.
by grayhatter 3mo ago
> Well, the creator of Bun is certainly someone that deserves professionalism. I disagree. (Funny that, different people with different values have different perspectives on acceptable behavior?) > You are just coming up with scenario
32.
by grayhatter 3mo ago
I'm interested in your perspective, Do you think you're more mad you got the vaccine, or more greatful that you did because an organic infection would have done more damage?
33.
by grayhatter 3mo ago
> If you want to tell someone their code quality is poor, then you better do so with specific things that is poor so that the person you are telling it to can learn and do better. You and I must have had very different interactions with
34.
by grayhatter 3mo ago
The answer is likely some form of different expectations. You expected the behavior not to be the topic. Where as I assume, other people are upset by the behavior of bun et al, and because this reply was somewhat measured, it seemed more po
35.
by grayhatter 3mo ago
a word, or a drow? But I'd also like a word with them. Or anyone else who might have a suggestion for "required reading". I'd like to think I know better than to use ascii art when it might flow into rtl text, but I wond
36.
by grayhatter 3mo ago
it is. If I call your code slop, I'm being professional and courteous. The truth doesn't have a ethical value. Me calling your code slop might feel disrespectful, but it's less disrespectful than trying to pass slop off for y
37.
by grayhatter 3mo ago
I built bot detection into the web framework I wrote. It's blocking well over >90% of the abuse. The secret 3rd option is write some code.
38.
by grayhatter 3mo ago
Allow me to reframe what I'm trying to say. Depending on how much placation and linguistic sugar you required to tolerate reality; you might need to remember, or think of ark is an asshole, but then so am I. I'm going to speak blu
39.
by grayhatter 3mo ago
> Or maybe he doesn't care, and just wants to attack Jarred? I've worked with ark enough that I think I've started to learn his default style, or at the very least to know that from him; this isn't an attack. If that
40.
by grayhatter 3mo ago
It's a losing game to try to keep any FOSS code completely isolated from large scraping data sets. All you can do is never share it, or share it and eventually it'll get consumed by the machine. Spend your time making better softw
41.
by grayhatter 3mo ago
That's the reason I left as well. I complained, was told I need to drop the attitude, or leave. so I left. must be harder than I think running a src forge
42.
by grayhatter 3mo ago
Did you just ask if we could use AI to create new/better honey bees?
43.
by grayhatter 3mo ago
Nah, that's on me: I was irked by the feeling that you weren't trying to talk in good faith. I still don't think you're trying to but at least now I'm less annoyed, and can apologize for trying to troll you in my la
44.
by grayhatter 3mo ago
If you run a server using TLS, and that server select Kyber, does the security of the connection depend on Kyber being sound? If I need to trust the security of the connection. I have to trust the server, because the server trusts Kyber, th
45.
by grayhatter 3mo ago
Did you really need me to specify rhetorically speaking? You weren't able to work out that on your own?
46.
by grayhatter 3mo ago
> Just because NIST engages in some wholesome activities doesn’t mean that their core purpose isn’t to do the bidding of the NSA. Their core purpose is to recommend standards that everyone can use, and anyone who wants to work with the U
47.
by grayhatter 3mo ago
My problem is with NIST, your problem is with DJB. Neither of us really want to defend either, (I assume, maybe you do want to defend one of them?) We just disagree which one is more likely to make the world worse. I'm not taken in by
48.
by grayhatter 3mo ago
I know the backstory. I know there's no real evidence or proof against Kyber's real security, only questions. I've also read the full email threads that I was able to find. Nearly everyone looks like a shithead. I'm sure
49.
by grayhatter 3mo ago
I'm not making a falsifiable argument. I'm stating that given their history, and current behavior I don't trust NIST and I don't think anyone else should either. They are keeping secrets around a new crypto system, the l
50.
by grayhatter 3mo ago
> Incorrect. My argument is that they aren't the same entity. Did I claim they were the same? > The thing you said is a whole different argument. "I like waffles" "So you hate pancakes" is happening. uh.... yo
51.
by grayhatter 3mo ago
You're argument is that I shouldn't think of NIST as a patsy for the NSA, is because the NSA can't possibly be recommending a compromised cipher, because if they were, that would mean this US government org is horribly defect
52.
by grayhatter 3mo ago
Because NIST chose it, after non-public input from the NSA. But if I am honest, NIST recommending it at all is enough to suspect it of being compromised. I say that as an American, and my non-american friends equally don't trust NIST o
53.
by grayhatter 3mo ago
My job is to teach students how to get stronger. Instead of forcing them to stack and rerack their own weights, and instead of using the existing university policy against plagiarism, or the existing social contract. I made them sign an add
54.
by grayhatter 3mo ago
> many people misunderstand the purpose of code review Oooh, I bet including the author? Yeah, right there, he fails to make any qualifications for his statement, making it factually incorrect. There are plenty of reasons to do code revi
55.
by grayhatter 3mo ago
Why? Something real, or just nonspecific vibes?
56.
by grayhatter 3mo ago
You say that like it's a bad thing, and not the defining characteristic of an well educated and well rounded human. One of the best ways humans have developed for information transfer is rhetorical debate. You're supposed to argue
57.
by grayhatter 3mo ago
Here's the sha of the prompt I submitted... no I don't know why there are no saved prompts with that sha. What do you mean you don't know where the bug is coming from? No, I absolutely didn't make it up, how could you ac
58.
by grayhatter 3mo ago
> So when an LLM was asked to analyze the unit distance conjecture, it just spat out a bunch of average-or-random tokens that coincidentally happened to correspond to a valid proof that had eluded humans for decades? yes https:/&#x
59.
by grayhatter 3mo ago
> Everyone gets to share, there's no rules here about not sharing / having a different experience than others. I disagree that this is a fair interpretation of the original objection. But assuming it is a possible interpretatio
60.
by grayhatter 3mo ago
I say you're wrong, you can either listen, or not. Let's assume you listen. You can then either adopt that new information into your world view, or discard it. Let's assume you adopt it as the truth. You can either update you

More ›