gray_charger

7 ms·

31.
by gray_charger 4y ago
I think centralized moderation is the problem with social media servers. Users should be the ones to control their own moderation. See a post you don't like? Hide the post. Don't like any posts from a particular user? Block the us
32.
by gray_charger 4y ago
Passwords are the only "warrant-proof" encryption method we have. A government can force you to provide either "something you have" (e.g. yubikey) or "something you are" (biometrics). For those in repressive re
33.
by gray_charger 4y ago
That's a false equivalency. One is a comparison of methods to mass produce the same text. AI produces very similar but unique works. One enables an author to reach a wider audience, the other kills authors by drowning their works in a
34.
by gray_charger 4y ago
They are not an archive the web, instead electing to remove websites they find distasteful. Not a reliable source of information thus not worth the donation.
35.
by gray_charger 4y ago
"The science" (I really hate that phrasing) doesn't change. Conclusive results require reproducibility. If "the science" changes then the initial findings were not reproducible and thus non conclusive and not "
36.
by gray_charger 4y ago
> In most (all?) societies that I am aware of you can forfeit your right to personal autonomy and/or life by committing a crime. Criminals still have rights, some specifically regarding the criminal justice system. Society has agree
37.
by gray_charger 4y ago
> If I commit a felony in the US as a US citizen I forfeit my right to vote. Many hold the opinion, as do I, that a felon serving their time and then being left unable to vote is a violation of their civil rights. > If I sell a copyri
38.
by gray_charger 4y ago
> ...and thus they've forfeited their rights to run a website. You cannot forfeit a right. The right either exists or it doesn't exist. Anything that can be forfeited is a privilege. Free speech is a right, but using other peop
39.
by gray_charger 4y ago
> In the 3rd security level, with scripts fully disabled, TAILS is one of the most robust solutions I'm aware of, with Whonix deserving a honorary mention. Tails and Whonix have different use cases. Whonix is meant to be a persisten
40.
by gray_charger 4y ago
I think you may be misinterpreting the use case for Signal. Signal is not meant to be used for anonymous communication, it's meant for secure communication. Signal's threat model is meant to solve issues with SMS: a MitM can tell
41.
by gray_charger 4y ago
How dare a website owner protect their website from malicious and illegal activity? /s
42.
by gray_charger 4y ago
"Too poor to afford $4/gallon? Just buy a brand new Tesla!"
43.
by gray_charger 4y ago
I genuinely don't understand the appeal of using ProtonMail if you're already using PGP. That's all ProtonMail is, convenient PGP. If they are already using PGP they can just use Fastmail and have the same privacy benefits.
44.
by gray_charger 4y ago
Thank you for this! I feel dumb. I've been using my RockPro64 as an OpenBSD router and I have wrestled with U-Boot to recognize my hardware. I didn't know OpenBSD came with U-Boot binaries, I've been compiling from source. I&
45.
by gray_charger 4y ago
AMD PSP is NOT the same as Intel ME. AMD PSP is a "trusted execution environment" (the first sentence in your link). Intel's equivalent is Intel SGX. Trusted execution environments are a security feature that does not offer r
46.
by gray_charger 4y ago
Is AES-XTS a secure mode? Or is that something else?
47.
by gray_charger 5y ago
This will get buried with the other comments, but I've done a good job getting away from Google: Email: Tutanota Calendar: Tutanota Messaging: Signal Phone: GrapheneOS Maps: OsmAnd~ Apps: F-Droid or Aurora Store Mobile Browser: Vanadiu
48.
by gray_charger 5y ago
ProtonMail is just PGP, nothing special about it.
49.
Heap Overflow in OpenBSD's Slaacd via Router Advertisement(blog.quarkslab.com)
55 points by gray_charger 5y ago|28 comments
50.
by gray_charger 5y ago
You're right, there is a middle ground. Law enforcement can request a warrant from a judge and demonstrate probable cause to search the machine they believe is harboring CSAM. Any attempt to bypass this process is totalitarianism.
51.
by gray_charger 5y ago
You could try this for DoH blocking. It probably needs help staying updated. https://codeberg.org/unixsheikh/dohblockbuster https://openbsdrouterguide.net/#blocking-doh
52.
Dns.sb provides fast and stable DNS resolver services(dns.sb)
1 points by gray_charger 5y ago|0 comments