gray_-_wolf

8 ms·

91.
by gray_-_wolf 3y ago
The reason does not seem to be stated at the provided link. If you know the reason (which your message seems to imply), could you please share it?
92.
by gray_-_wolf 3y ago
I also do not like "crypto", but I do not think this type of restriction is great on a paid service. Maybe, maybe it could be argued for public repositories. Or if it was free. But like, why does Drew DeVault care that I woul
93.
by gray_-_wolf 3y ago
I stopped paying for sourcehut because his opinions are relevant here since he bans types of projects based on them. You never know when another restriction will be added.
94.
by gray_-_wolf 3y ago
Hm, cannot you just have a tree-way switch determining the active control (both, A only, B only)?
95.
by gray_-_wolf 3y ago
> There's no clear notion of status, remaining concerns, priority, etc. in an email thread. Which, for drive-by contributions, does not really matter. It is a problem for long term contributions and project managements in general,
96.
by gray_-_wolf 3y ago
It is unusual term in the area of protocols, but it seems understandable it tries to draw a parallel to higher order functions. So "some nonsense" might be a bit strong...
97.
by gray_-_wolf 3y ago
> I think they also encourage drive-by contributions I realize I am in minority, but for me, if project uses a mailing list I am more likely to do a drive-by contribution (compared to no contribution at all). Just doing git send-email i
98.
by gray_-_wolf 3y ago
Hm, from the reading, it seem he was pretty careful to not do any harm, but still, is this type of practical research actually legal?
99.
by gray_-_wolf 3y ago
That would work for (some) fields, but I do not expect enough people will volunteer to clean up the streets or stock up the shelf at the stores.
100.
by gray_-_wolf 3y ago
2-9%
101.
by gray_-_wolf 3y ago
> it makes this analysis far more accessible than it was before How does the average engineer verify if the result is correct? You claim (and I believe you) to be able to do this "by hand", if required. Great, but that likel
102.
by gray_-_wolf 3y ago
I mean, 300kB is just the changelog and >1MB is configure script... Translations take up a lot as well. I am not arguing nano is pinnacle of minimalism, but it is not like it's 3MB of C code.
103.
by gray_-_wolf 3y ago
> into the main branch into the master branch
104.
by gray_-_wolf 3y ago
> Well yes, you can do that, but it won't be compatible with the cloud SDKs I am confused why you just could not use the AWS_WEB_IDENTITY_TOKEN_FILE. You could just produce that file for every user, refresh it before expiration and
105.
by gray_-_wolf 3y ago
Not really. You can have a daemon, that fetches from IMDS just what the particular user needs and stores it in a way accessible to just that user.
106.
by gray_-_wolf 3y ago
You can use iptables to allow access only from the root user. That is what we do. I feel like that help to a large degree, assuming you properly run the applications under separate users.
107.
by gray_-_wolf 3y ago
You might give GNU Guix a try, combination of guix time-machine and guix shell -C should give you the exact same environment each time without fear of being affected by the rest of the system (with the obvious exception of the linux kernel)
108.
by gray_-_wolf 3y ago
I've just attended a conference in France this week, can confirm, seems pretty accurate.
109.
by gray_-_wolf 3y ago
Sure, I don't have to, but everything in the stack assumes I would run it in the recommended way. I gave up trying to setup my LAN to support IPv6 after I wasted more than 2 hours on convincing my router, and devices behind it, to so
110.
by gray_-_wolf 3y ago
I think that if IPv6 would just be IPv4 with bigger addresses, the rollout would be much easier. Sure, you would still need new hardware, but the basic operations would still be the same as IPv4. Currently, it is far from that.
111.
by gray_-_wolf 3y ago
It does not matter if you have one commit. If your change is split into few commits for increased readability, in that case it does matter. Do you really believe that if, for example, this change to btrfs filesystem https://lore
112.
by gray_-_wolf 3y ago
> * "fixing whitespace" * "incorporate review comments" * "fix broken test" * "fix other broken test" Things like this should not be standalone commits though, they should be incorporated into the
113.
by gray_-_wolf 3y ago
You mean like for example `git log --first-parent`?
114.
by gray_-_wolf 3y ago
It phabricator still alive? Or rather, phorge? I somewhat stopped paying attention, so I wonder if the fork is alive and well.
115.
by gray_-_wolf 3y ago
> The problem with opaque records like "029845yn0sidng0345randomnyosndgf03548yn" is that you have zero clue what it's authorizing, I would have hoped the DNS management is automated and IaC-ed, so you just check the releva
116.
by gray_-_wolf 3y ago
> Or French, or Chinese, or Swahili, neither of which I know - to stave off the usual replies of the "you only want it because you already know English" kind. Yes and no. French sure, but in my experience of trying to learn Ja
117.
by gray_-_wolf 3y ago
Probably an unpopular opinion, but I just do not want to have a "business" relationship with google. I would not mind paying for youtube, if it was a separate company. But google does not need my money, and any money the get are
118.
by gray_-_wolf 3y ago
> How will tools like this persist They will not, that is the whole point of WEI.
119.
by gray_-_wolf 3y ago
I don't have a problem with people having problems. I have plenty of problems. What I do not like is putting absolute statements like "never seen anything more disgusting". That usually just means you are not looking hard
120.
by gray_-_wolf 3y ago
> I don't get easily offended, but I've honestly never seen anything more disgusting in my entire life. Try watching some documentaries about Tiananmen Square or Uyghurs. I am curious if this statement will still hold.

More ›