gravypod

87 ms·

871.
by gravypod 6y ago
I hope this accelerates interest around web-based development environments. If someone could pre-package a setup containing language servers for "all" languages, a build system that is generic to all languages (bazel or bazel-like
872.
by gravypod 6y ago
It's also possible to completely automate this. Flow.io has a great talk where the CTO talks about everything they do from an engineering perspective. Just annotate data in your API spec language as PII. This can allow you to also have
873.
by gravypod 7y ago
How do you handle very complex and integrated architectures like a monorepo with many microservices? How do you run your layer file locally? Can you describe automated tests in a layer file? I built something similar[0] to this for integrat
874.
by gravypod 7y ago
Sorry, this might be a bit off topic but it's something I've been excited about for a while. From what I've heard Microsoft is sort of getting behind gRPC. Have you tested using QUIC as a transport layer for the gRPC client&#
875.
by gravypod 7y ago
I hope someone with context on this issue sees your comment and can confirm if this contains an actual, working, on-demand GPU scheduler. If it does I'll be switching immediately.
876.
by gravypod 7y ago
> It increases the barrier to entry if you are going to leave a TODO (versus leaving it out or just not being lazy and doing it), and prevents the backlog from needing even more grooming I would rather have many tickets that specify actu
877.
by gravypod 7y ago
It's too bad those tickets aren't created automatically. That probably raises the bar for people wanting to add these sorts of comments.
878.
by gravypod 7y ago
It's unfortunate gitlab is built as a monolith. I'd be very capable of writing the code for implementing such a feature myself if gitlab had a first class API. The code, as we all know, would look something like this: for comm
879.
by gravypod 7y ago
Doing it client side might make it hard to do things like accepting MRs from forks.
880.
by gravypod 7y ago
The ticket serves as a communication point and a cost estimate tool. Even if the tasks are never explicitly assigned they are very useful. That's why I'd like a comment ticket linkage system. Support the positives of both usages b
881.
by gravypod 7y ago
That's neat. I never knew this existed. Unfortunately I mainly use Gitlab wherever I work.
882.
by gravypod 7y ago
I wish there was a way to leave a comment like // todo(gravypod, techdebt): some description of the issue and have that, when pushed up to a VCS, turn into an issue created, assigned to me, and labeled with tech debt. I k
883.
by gravypod 7y ago
Yep, too early and too little coffee. s/ntfs/nfs/g
884.
by gravypod 7y ago
> The announcement does not specify whether this will also work with EKS (Kubernetes) Fargate but the mounts appear to be on the container level. Given this it seems likely that this will work for EKS also. If you have definitive informa
885.
by gravypod 7y ago
Does anyone have a good suggestion for ergonomic and functional ticket systems you can self host? Preferably with some board management? This is personally my key take away from this.
886.
by gravypod 7y ago
My college had a 30k/year tuition. 4 years of that comes out to 120k. Your figure assumes >70% of costs are paid without debt. 30k/year is common now for an undergraduate degree from a state school with dorm.
887.
by gravypod 7y ago
Is there anyone working on advancing CitCs in the open source space? Having some work flow like that would really improve my productivity and the safety of my code/deployment scripts.
888.
by gravypod 7y ago
What would need to exist to make such a proof specification utility less boring? I know many engineers who never thought they'd use unit tests until I was able to demonstrate immediate workflow benefit that made their job far easier th
889.
by gravypod 7y ago
Does cloud run or fargate have an equivalent to a statefulset? Persistent storage and the ability to talk to a specific node/instance?
890.
by gravypod 7y ago
Many people I've worked with in the past have unfortunately shared the sentiment of the author. I think the issue is sustainability of documentation practices. There's a desire path that engineers exhibit when writing docs. We jus
891.
by gravypod 7y ago
Came here to say something similar. The interfaces and tooling around gRPC in the public sphere is pretty bad. If you maintain a code base with multiple languages and want to compile gRPC for it you can choose between: 1. Having a complex b
892.
by gravypod 7y ago
> This didn't warrant that kind of response in January Could China's mobilization of resources have been a hint to us that this would have made sense? Even early on there were stories breaking of people taking double doses of s
893.
by gravypod 7y ago
It looks like this is being used more as an educational tool for the authors daughter than it is being used for a production workload. Kube is basically fancy systemd built to run on multiple machines. If you wanted to you could use this fo
894.
by gravypod 7y ago
I'm not a doctor but I think there's multiple types of ventilation. There's invasive and non invasive ventilation. Invasive ventilation requires a tube inserted into you and it's very unpleasant. You are often sedated wh
895.
by gravypod 7y ago
Is there any comparison of the tooling/performance/etc of MessagePack, BSON, Protobuffers, Flatbuffers, and plain JSON?
896.
by gravypod 7y ago
Same here. Namecheap customer with a few domains. Glad they aren't just rolling over. Even if they just asked FB to get a subpoena I'd be happy.
897.
by gravypod 7y ago
They do in part but developers need to be aware of two major things: 1. Always be backwards compatible in protocols and data formats. If you store data on disk or in a table you V1 and V2 tables need to be generally compatible. V2 should al
898.
by gravypod 7y ago
Does anyone have a good solution for orchestrating language servers? With a mildly complex code base (grpc/thirft + python + build system) there's a lot of languages in play. At any small to medium company you're looking at a
899.
by gravypod 7y ago
I've done some initial investigation a while ago. You should be able to attach gdb to a process in a different cgroup. To more quickly edit configs just make it so your containers build and start quickly. This is very easy to do if you
900.
by gravypod 7y ago
In my opinion development environments should be as close to production as humanly possible. Configuration of services, network policies, build systems that are used in CI, etc. The closer you get to sharing tooling and configuration betwee

More ›