Y
HN Search
Hacker News Search
new
|
comments
|
top
|
jobs
gravypod
searching PlanetScale…
1.
▲
2.
▲
3.
▲
4.
▲
5.
▲
6.
▲
62 ms
·
571.
▲
by
gravypod
6y ago
I'm assuming these are instructions for self tests or verification. If so, removing the instructions after they are manufactured wouldn't be easy. You can do it in microcode at the cost of making all execution slightly slower (if
572.
▲
by
gravypod
6y ago
In college we had to use them. It was a financial burden on myself. $100/course essentially. Our school mandated that we take homeworks using Pearson's online system. This means if you found a used copy of the book it was essentia
573.
▲
by
gravypod
6y ago
Yep, and if you get everything working smoothly enough developers can use the same very polished tooling for their own workflow.
574.
▲
by
gravypod
6y ago
I think the main issue is that most build systems are not expressive enough to do complex packaging, code gen, etc that most projects need. I've been using Bazel for a few projects/teams and it's worked really well. Once your
575.
▲
by
gravypod
6y ago
With CI Boss: "Alice, can you release Super Mega Money Maker" Alice: clicks deploy on a UI It'll be out in 5 minutes. Boss: "Thanks!" Without CI Boss: "Bob is out sick, can you deploy Super Mega Money Mak
576.
▲
by
gravypod
6y ago
If you need persistent state is there much of a difference with this approach and a StatefulSet with replicas=1?
577.
▲
by
gravypod
6y ago
I think there's a company attempting to implement their own version of something similar. A very important part of search is also the understanding of language semantics. Something that is really cool for this is Kythe [0]. [0] - http
578.
▲
by
gravypod
6y ago
In my opinion you should only test the functionality of the code that you're "talking about". Ideally you'll have some component that exposes a `GetX(id)`, `SaveX(x)`, `FindX(WithName(foobar))` or something. That code sh
579.
▲
by
gravypod
6y ago
A very worrying component of this: are they dropping the charges because they see this is ridiculous or because it's gotten media attention?
580.
▲
by
gravypod
6y ago
I can't wait for the API to be completed. I want to build something to archive HN (article + comments) and turn it into epub go read offline. Hard to do currently.
581.
▲
by
gravypod
6y ago
For many users having an easy to browse/navigate interface is a good selling point. This reminds me of this post about Dropbox: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=9224
582.
▲
by
gravypod
6y ago
What are your reasons for not supporting this move? I have no skin in the game and no understanding of what's going on here.
583.
▲
by
gravypod
6y ago
This is something that I love about using Bazel. It allows you to do this. Bazel is aware of application-level concepts: libraries, binaries, and everything that glues this together. It has a simple way to describe a "test" (somet
584.
▲
by
gravypod
6y ago
> She got all the morphine she wanted, and various other comfort measures. Something I don't understand: why don't they start with that? Why wait until you're near death? I'm assuming there's a good reason but I&
585.
▲
by
gravypod
6y ago
Is there something like this with math? Linear Algebra specifically?
586.
▲
by
gravypod
6y ago
For me, I went to a dentist with good reviews, he asked if I had sensitivity to cold and I said no. He said try X anyway. I tried it and it's one of those experiences like people who put on glasses that didn't know they had visio
587.
▲
by
gravypod
6y ago
In some situations that's just not an option because once you've acquired the skill you now need to be paid for the skill in order for this system to be at all fair. That's also not saying anything about the feasibility
588.
▲
by
gravypod
6y ago
Do zig, python, elisp, Clojure, Haskell (mostly a research project), etc fit the bill?
589.
▲
by
gravypod
6y ago
> - tooling is abyssmal ( IDE etc ... ) As others have mentioned this is a side effect of how young it is. > - no real support, I'm not even sure if there is one paid guy anymnore on the project If paid support is all that counts
590.
▲
by
gravypod
6y ago
I don't know if you live in the US but for anyone who doesn't I think this mainly boils down to this: the average US citizen does not believe metal health issues are real. In high school I've met people who were clearly suici
591.
▲
by
gravypod
6y ago
> like the effing Borg and it's great! Don't know if that was an intended nod but I liked it :) https://storage.googleapis.com/pub-tools-public-publication-...
592.
▲
by
gravypod
6y ago
Reminds me of Half Life: Alyx's comments on a Club Sandwich: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=r3cERBPQSkY
593.
▲
by
gravypod
6y ago
If you end up making a blog post about how you do your deployments/monitoring and what it's enabled you to do I think it'd be a great contrast to the "kubernetes is complicated" sentiment on HN.
594.
▲
by
gravypod
6y ago
I have heard of people taking "years" to migrate to kube but only on HN and only on company who's timelines for "lets paint the walls of our buildings" stretch into the decades. But, even once you move, you get bene
595.
▲
by
gravypod
6y ago
Very few people who suggest using kubernetes are suggesting using kubespray or kubeadm. 99% of companies will want to just pay for a managed kubernetes cluster which, for all intents and purposes, is basically AWS ECS with more features and
596.
▲
by
gravypod
6y ago
Docker attempts to do all of these things. It may not do them well but it provides a framework/opinion on how this should all be managed: 1. binary + configs (PWD, files, ENV): baked into the image's Dockerfile 2. Secrets: passed
597.
▲
by
gravypod
6y ago
"Running a binary" is still super easy. All you need to do is take account of log management, process isolation, networking configs (port forwarding), service discovery, health checking, data storage folders, fault-tolerant rollba
598.
▲
by
gravypod
6y ago
> unless you have Google's size microservices and infrastructure gRPC (with protocol buffers) is just tedious Having used gRPC in very small teams (<5 engineers touching backend stuff) I had a very different experience from yours
599.
▲
by
gravypod
6y ago
In my personal experience the other huge benefit is you now have a source of truth for documentation. Since your API definition is code you can leave comments in it and code review it all while having a language that is very approachable
600.
▲
by
gravypod
6y ago
I'd also be much happier if LSPs were in Thrift or gRPC (something more generic with existing client/server generators). Would make documenting, updating, and understanding the protocol much easier.
More ›