grandempire

7 ms·

31.
by grandempire 1y ago
> he can't access anything the Legislature's laws say he can't. Can the legislature make rules for the president without constitutional amendment? I am interested- I’ll see if I can find examples.
32.
by grandempire 1y ago
I think you are saying there are other kinds of displays which are not typical monitors and those displays show different kinds of images - and I don’t disagree.
33.
by grandempire 1y ago
I would agree with that emphasis. Misusing presidential privilege is always a possible impeachment, if congress cares. I think that he can access a health or irs record for cause - anything which would not get him impeached.
34.
by grandempire 1y ago
Please fill me in.
35.
by grandempire 1y ago
> I said subpixels are rectangles. Because they are https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/4/4d/Pixel_ge... I look forward to your paper about a superior digital image representation.
36.
by grandempire 1y ago
> It outputs a voltage proportional to the (filtered) photon count across the entire area. This is not true. And it’s even debunked in the original article.
37.
by grandempire 1y ago
You only have to give GPL source to the people who you distribute software to. You can fork anything privately for yourself.
38.
by grandempire 1y ago
You have to keep git repos public as a government employee?
39.
by grandempire 1y ago
> which grabs areas And outputs what? Just because the input is an area does not mean the output is an area. What it if it outputs the peak of the distribution across the area? > that are pretty square. If we look at a camera sensor a
40.
by grandempire 1y ago
> I dont think POTUS can What data in a federal agency could the chief executive not have authorization to access?
41.
by grandempire 1y ago
> And the mismatch of the square model So your intuition for why squares makes sense is wrong, but you’re still holding on to it. > doesn't mean the point model is good. What does show it’s a good model is all the theory of image
42.
by grandempire 1y ago
Yep, cameras filter the input from sensors. > Any point approximation would have to be in software. Circuits can process signals too.
43.
by grandempire 1y ago
And that full dynamic range is in the images’s point samples, ready to be remapped for a physical output.
44.
by grandempire 1y ago
> Cameras don't take point samples. That's an approximation They use a physical process to attempt to determine light at a single point. That’s their model they try to approximate. > And for pixel art, the intent is usually
45.
by grandempire 1y ago
Do the 3 separate sub pixels look like a photoshop pixel?
46.
by grandempire 1y ago
They tend to have rounded or cut corners and are not uniform.
47.
by grandempire 1y ago
What is a little rectangle? Physical display pixels are separate RGB leds with a non-rectangular shape.
48.
by grandempire 1y ago
Definitions of technical things you aren’t familiar with tend to be odd. You are referring to a physical piece of a display panel. A representation of an image in software is a different thing. Hardware and software transforms the dsp signa
49.
by grandempire 1y ago
I’ll quote my other comment: > If you are looking to understand how your operating system will display images, or how your graphics drivers work, or how photoshop will edit them, or what digital cameras aim to produce, then it’s the poin
50.
by grandempire 1y ago
> There's no single correct way to interpret the numbers They are just bits in a computer. But there is a correct way of to interpret them in a particular context. For example 32 bits can be meaningless - or it can have an interpret
51.
by grandempire 1y ago
> It affects moire pattern behavior and creates some artifacts. Yes. The spacing between point samples determines the frequency, a fundamental characteristic of a dsp signal.
52.
by grandempire 1y ago
> A pixel is two dimensional, by definition. A pixel is a point sample by definition.
53.
by grandempire 1y ago
Ok, but that’s not what an digital image is. Images are designed to be invariant across camera capture and display hardware. The panel driver should interpret the dsp representation into an appropriate electronic pixel output.
54.
by grandempire 1y ago
> Horner's method or another representation of your polynomial might start to become important. Horner's is the default way to evaluate a polynomial - and I think you're overstating the cost of evaluation. > what the
55.
by grandempire 1y ago
> Can you broadly explain where the gap in AI pedagogy is and how students can fill it? Machine learning can be made much more effective and efficient, by first modeling the problem, and then optimizing that tailored representation. This
56.
by grandempire 1y ago
Numerical analysis is ALL about picking the right tool for the job. Unfortunately, there aren't super methods and you need to know how to classify problems.
57.
by grandempire 1y ago
This position has nothing to do with science. Science doesn’t say we are the only intelligent forms in the universe. Science doesn’t say intelligent max’s out with humans. Science doesn’t describe concepts outside of time and space.
58.
by grandempire 1y ago
Thanks. That looks like a way for Catholics to support and endorse scientific research rather than a develop alternative science.
59.
by grandempire 1y ago
On second thought I think you’re right. The layperson can become more aware of religious politics, because there is so little exposure. I hope the next step is for people to understand that religious problems are actually people problems. A
60.
by grandempire 1y ago
> especially w.r.t science I would like to know more. My impression is that most Christian institutions have long ago disentangled from scientific debate - providing interpretative value rather than alternative science. This is part of

More ›