gragas

38 ms·

331.
by gragas 10y ago
Really? - Hillary and her team deliberately trying to trick the FBI by giving them a "slightly broader" set of emails [1]: "What that means specifically is that they are going to turn over all the Blumenthal emails to the Com
332.
by gragas 10y ago
Isn't this basically just wider SIMD? Is this in anyway actually tailored specifically to deep learning?
333.
by gragas 10y ago
TL;DR: You can basically do 8 operations at once (but of course, it's not that simple). Think about a normal 64-bit register: you can add and subtract 64-bit numbers, OR and AND them, etc. Now think about a 64- byte register. What cou
334.
by gragas 10y ago
I was in the original thread and got screens of Combetta's history before he deleted it. I see /pol/ as one of the last bastions of political discussion that's not flooded with liberal propaganda, though that has been ch
335.
by gragas 10y ago
If you can find me a single NYT article about Combetta's reddit posts (which were reviewed multiple times by the House---to their complete astonishment), please post a link.
336.
by gragas 10y ago
I think sexual assault is absolutely abhorrent. I don't think NYT being biased wipes clean any of the guilt of Trump. If he truly committed sexual assault he should be held under the same standards as the rest of us. Conversely, I thin
337.
by gragas 10y ago
I completely agree. And it's worth noting that "pravda" translates to "True" or "Truth" in English, which was used multiple allegories by George Orwell throughout his work.
338.
by gragas 10y ago
Mr. Trump said all of these awful things 10 years ago, and according to the Times it is perfectly acceptable to extrapolate these to the modern day and most importantly to predictions about Trump's policy making. Just 10 years ago, H
339.
by gragas 10y ago
The CIA has had 60 years of "illegal" coups and overthrows of democratically-elected governments. Many would find nearly everything that the CIA has done to be extremely unethical, un-humanitarian. That said, I agree that the CIA
340.
by gragas 10y ago
Why is that page covered in seemingly unrelated anti-Trump propaganda? What does alleged white supremacy have to do with the narcotics trade?
341.
by gragas 10y ago
Why does everyone just take the word of the current administration to be true? The director of national intelligence, James Clapper, said that he (and the US' intelligence agencies by proxy) is uncertain who is responsible for the atta
342.
by gragas 10y ago
That's the official statement by the Obama administration . Mr. Clapper, who represents the agencies that actually know anything at all about the attacks, says otherwise.
343.
by gragas 10y ago
I completely agree that this is an attempt to divert attention. The Times did the best they could to support the DNC with those headlines, but if you actually read the article, the director of national intelligence himself says that he is u
344.
by gragas 10y ago
The Times is one of the most biased sources of media these days. Obama blamed Russia for directed hacks, while if you get past the NYTimes headline, you'll read this: > The statement from Mr. Clapper and the Department of Homeland
345.
by gragas 10y ago
They also have at least part of CoreOS (S13).
346.
by gragas 10y ago
>Mississippi's GDP per capita being similar to that of France, Italy or Spain is really hard to reconcile with the fact that many of us would love to live in the latter countries and couldn't be paid to move to Mississippi. It
347.
by gragas 10y ago
It's already gg, man. Even if you don't use Google products, if the NSA or CIA want to know everything about you, they can. You have two choices: 1. Do unimportant things that don't intersect with the interests of the NS
348.
by gragas 10y ago
This is precisely why it's kind of scary that the FBI did what it did to apprehend these people. But we should not think that at the end of the day, the people caught should be free to go because of the means by which the FBI caught th
349.
by gragas 10y ago
That's a ridiculous argument. You don't just "hang around" child porn websites without participating. Furthermore, the FBI achieved their goal at the end of the day. Just because evidence is obtained illegally doesn&#x27
350.
by gragas 10y ago
I'd rather say that I'm very impressed with the extent to which the FBI went to compromise these people from a technical standpoint. What they did is scary, yes. But I'm still very satisfied knowing that the FBI will put in
351.
by gragas 10y ago
Honestly, I'm very satisfied with the work the FBI did in this case. To those mad about the FBI overstepping privacy rights on shaky grounds: how could you possibly need more evidence than proof of visits to a website that distributes
352.
by gragas 10y ago
Think about it this way: what does a filesystem do?
353.
by gragas 10y ago
Modafinil was quite cheap and easy to get in my experience. That was in the middle of the US, nowhere near a big city.
354.
by gragas 10y ago
He's saying that Soros directly supports policy that forces countries to accept migrants. Historically, alongside massive inflows of migrants there have been tremendous rises in violent crime and sexual assault in Northern European cou
355.
by gragas 10y ago
I completely agree. I recently moved to San Francisco from Iowa. The city itself is truly shocking. I find myself looking back on life in Iowa quite frequently, and I think of it very similarly to this Nabokov quote: a kind of private univ
356.
by gragas 10y ago
So can I not go since tickets are already sold out?
357.
by gragas 10y ago
I'm almost certain that construction will continue at some point in the future.
358.
by gragas 10y ago
You provide a good counterpoint, but I think slavery was nowhere near an asset that the CIA is and has been to the United States (whether this has been a good thing for humanity and human rights as a whole is another question). The CIA has
359.
by gragas 10y ago
The CIA is one of the US' greatest assets. It's not going to be "exposed" and go away. Sure, many of it's atrocities might come to light and the public will be mildly upset. But the CIA isn't going anywhere.
360.
by gragas 10y ago
It's probably just me, but this all seems hilariously similar to the "shadow" metaphor that Comey (FBI Director) mentioned in his speech the other day. I half-jokingly think this is just an FBI front.

More ›