grabeh

15 ms·

121.
by grabeh 13y ago
First principles tell us that any work created in the course of employment is automatically owned by the employer (s.11(2) CDPA '88) except where there is an agreement to the contrary. Unfortunately the phrase 'course of employmen
122.
by grabeh 13y ago
When it comes down to it, it is a matter of whether or not the consumer is likely to be confused by the usage. King's statement seems to say that it is the combination of the usage of the 'Saga' suffix and a similar game mech
123.
by grabeh 13y ago
I suspect you may already be aware, but if not then here's a related project https://github.com/creationix/js-git . Lest you misunderstand, I'm not saying you should stop development, I just thought it might b
124.
Google must face UK courts over claims of privacy breach of iPhone users(theguardian.com)
2 points by grabeh 13y ago|0 comments
125.
by grabeh 13y ago
The specific grounds for the fine by the Fair Trade Commission are not made clear in the brief article however, if as is stated in the article the Taiwanese companies had obtained reseller rights to set a price and then this was being under
126.
by grabeh 13y ago
Being a beginner, I'm using an Acer C270 Chromebook with Crouton to develop on Ubuntu with Sublime Text 2 to write JavaScript (Node and client-side).
127.
Linting recruiter emails(blog.sourcing.io)
1 points by grabeh 13y ago|0 comments
128.
by grabeh 13y ago
Presumably there are legitimate concerns from the company relating to liability over third party use of the software. There may also be issues over third party commercialisation. Firstly, what was the licence if any attached to the software
129.
Google’s Role In Woodland Child Pornography Arrest Raises Privacy Concerns(sacramento.cbslocal.com)
1 points by grabeh 13y ago|0 comments
130.
by grabeh 13y ago
When all you have is a launch page and no functionality demonstrating the features of the site, the points you mention are what many people are likely to focus on.
131.
by grabeh 13y ago
It would certainly be open to the user to argue before a court that as the plain English version was more easily understood and avoided obscure legal terms, then that is the version that is enforceable against them. This is particularly the
132.
Moving towards object-oriented JavaScript(blog.grabeh.net)
2 points by grabeh 13y ago|0 comments
133.
AngularJS + Cloud Endpoints: A Recipe for Building Modern Web Applications(cloud.google.com)
2 points by grabeh 13y ago|0 comments
134.
A way to test the genuineness of the world's costliest coffee(economist.com)
1 points by grabeh 13y ago|0 comments
135.
A comparison of drafting legal documents vs coding(blog.grabeh.net)
1 points by grabeh 13y ago|0 comments
136.
by grabeh 13y ago
What special status do they hold?
137.
Amazon press release relating to Kindle MatchBook(phx.corporate-ir.net)
1 points by grabeh 13y ago|0 comments
138.
by grabeh 13y ago
No one ever sues over an NDA. The point of an NDA is to set up an expectation of confidentiality. It's easier than having the conversation that you expect the discussions to go no further which leaves the possibility of ambiguity. Abso
139.
Online terms - better with notice(blog.grabeh.net)
1 points by grabeh 13y ago|0 comments
140.
by grabeh 13y ago
I agree that there is a risk that all uses will be pursued and as you allude to, potential damage to a brand is in the eye of the beholder. However you're making a leap from a use which could conceivably harm the distinctiveness of a m
141.
by grabeh 13y ago
You can trade mark any word if it is sufficiently distinctive and can uniquely identify you as the provider of that product and/or services. For example 'Computer' for canned goods would be fine, but obviously registering &#x
142.
by grabeh 13y ago
It is absolutely untrue that you risk losing a mark if you do not enforce it widely. There is an obligation to enforce against third party uses which would undermine the distinctiveness of the mark/confuse the public, however not every
143.
by grabeh 13y ago
Thanks for that. Interesting! Looks like in Australia there has to be a likelihood of confusion even where a mark has reputation. This is not the case in the EU, where the mere act of taking unfair advantage/causing detriment is suffic
144.
by grabeh 13y ago
I agree however looking forwards the brand could grow sufficiently large to gain this enhanced protection. I think even if this did happen Apple would be unlikely to enforce overly harshly but their stance on the App Store mark goes some wa
145.
by grabeh 13y ago
The owner of a mark with a sufficient reputation can take action against dissimilar goods and services where they're riding on the goodwill of the mark of course so TMs are not completely limited to their classes. Rolex could sue me if
146.
The curious tale of the element moving on hover(blog.grabeh.net)
2 points by grabeh 13y ago|0 comments
147.
The myth of mandatory trade mark enforcement(blog.grabeh.net)
3 points by grabeh 13y ago|0 comments
148.
Automated publishing on a VPS using Draftin webhooks and Node.js(blog.grabeh.net)
1 points by grabeh 13y ago|0 comments
149.
by grabeh 13y ago
It sounds like you should be proud. From a risk perspective, I can't say that simply removing the links removes all risk, it only reduces the risk. Anyone reading the account and knowing the guy in question may be able to identify that
150.
by grabeh 13y ago
I absolutely understand anonymising however my point was that providing links in your profile risks undermining the purpose behind this anonymisation. Further from a legal perspective using a pseudonym to refer to a person doesn't nece

More ›