Y
HN Search
Hacker News Search
new
|
comments
|
top
|
jobs
gpm
searching PlanetScale…
1.
▲
2.
▲
3.
▲
4.
▲
5.
▲
6.
▲
15 ms
·
241.
▲
by
gpm
5mo ago
I've definitely had my m1 air get uncomfortably hot to touch - particularly right above the keyboard. (While doing developery things)
242.
▲
by
gpm
5mo ago
> Kalshi refused to pay out To be clear they had explicitly written in the contract from the start that death didn't count. And they paid out the full amount - just not to the same betters they would have if he had left office alive
243.
▲
by
gpm
5mo ago
My "I have no clue how this works" proposal to minimize the chance of sparking would be to re-purpose a waterjet cutter...
244.
▲
by
gpm
5mo ago
> Not just DRAM market, but the GPU market soon China doesn't have EUV fabs... They've pushed DUV impressively far... but until they get EUV working industrially (and reasonable timelines are at least 2-4 years for that) it sho
245.
▲
by
gpm
5mo ago
For supply to meet demand. Depends very much on how aggressively producers scale and on how demand grows or shrinks. Safe to say at least a year or two. It'd be shocking if it took a decade.
246.
▲
by
gpm
5mo ago
Probably, but at some point we're very likely to run out of significant training improvements and it's not clear that we'll see that point coming from a long way out. Likewise it's probably dwarfed by improvements in how
247.
▲
by
gpm
5mo ago
An interesting implication of this is that AI inference and training has a path to a ~3x hardware cost reduction (and maybe ~2x total cost reduction) without any technical innovation whatsoever, we just need to wait for dram supply to meet
248.
▲
by
gpm
5mo ago
> They did try upstreaming to Zig Nothing in your link supports this assertion. Lots of things in your link support the exact opposite in fact, that the Bun team explicitly chose not to attempt to upstream the changes.
249.
▲
by
gpm
5mo ago
> They couldn't upstream their vibe coded "improvements" What are you talking about? There is no upstream rejecting contributions here. It's the original bun developers who vibe-ported it to rust and they absolutely c
250.
▲
by
gpm
5mo ago
> Saying "because they vibe coded we are dropping support for Bun" sounds political. I don't think "political" is necessarily a bad thing. Engaging in politics is how you shape the world. The mere act of writing
251.
▲
by
gpm
5mo ago
> Have you observed Bun have more segfaults, OOMs, etc, since the Rust rewrite? Have you noticed more security vulnerabilities? Have you seen more bugs? (Of course you haven't, the rewrite hasn't even landed yet.) On the flip s
252.
▲
by
gpm
5mo ago
I don't see any hypocrisy in the comment you are criticizing. The behavior they are criticizing appears to be vibe coding. How is rejecting something for being vibe coding "exhibiting the behavior" of vibe coding?
253.
▲
by
gpm
5mo ago
I'd hope that the bun team is going to put into the work to ensure the LLM translated version is up to snuff before cutting a release from it though... it doesn't seem fair to assume that that isn't going to happen.
254.
▲
by
gpm
5mo ago
Pedantically I disagree, to leave something in a condition it must have been in that condition in the first place. We could have a game where you're allowed to place your king in check, but if it is in check at the start of your turn y
255.
▲
by
gpm
5mo ago
> Or it might have ignited a fusion reaction in the atmosphere and destroyed the world Someone's got to explain to me how this was even remotely plausible. We've had orders of magnitude more energetic events in earth's his
256.
▲
by
gpm
5mo ago
Turning The Line into one giant ~~paperclip~~ chip assembly line! We can call it the Peta(Principle)Line!
257.
▲
by
gpm
5mo ago
Or SpaceX is absorbing the risk should that power be turned off... still morally shitty but not obviously economically so.
258.
▲
by
gpm
5mo ago
Predatory pricing is a great business strategy and all (particularly when countering the competitors predatory pricing - what could go wrong), but that doesn't mean that the gemini-team should account for it as if they're getting
259.
▲
by
gpm
5mo ago
One of the many things Google was pitching today is that they're going to run things like google search with access to linux container environments to do things like run tool calls... which will presumably be able to rasterize SVGs and
260.
▲
by
gpm
5mo ago
The cost at such they could rent out the TPUs, i.e. the market rate, is the inference cost. Just because you are vertically integrated doesn't mean you get to discount the one business units products to the other. Doing so discounts th
261.
▲
by
gpm
5mo ago
If this was the case wouldn't it be easier to measure the pulse in peoples left wrists? Which doesn't seem to be a thing?
262.
▲
by
gpm
5mo ago
That seems like it will work for single events, but that it would be very hard for complex topics which are closely intertwined with factual things you do want it to be able to answer... Is Taiwan part of China - the CPP wants the answer to
263.
▲
by
gpm
5mo ago
No, the same discussion. It's fair to say the British navy is a shadow of the former British navy that more or less conquered the world. It's also obvious the current one with an aircraft carrier would beat the former one with woo
264.
▲
by
gpm
5mo ago
I assume it's to discredit the current international insurance scheme for shipping that doubles as a method of enforcing sanctions.
265.
▲
by
gpm
5mo ago
> maybe even criminals under international law Piracy has to be the canonical example of criminals under international law...
266.
▲
by
gpm
5mo ago
That doesn't seem like the relevant question. A navy barely progressing as the technology progresses by leaps and bounds is just as problematic when you're measuring its strength compared to its adversaries.
267.
▲
by
gpm
5mo ago
If they succeed the software will be more reliable with less memory issues that are very likely significant security issues at least some of the time. When we've seen linux having a new significant exploit every other day now thanks to
268.
▲
by
gpm
5mo ago
It doesn't. The rust compiler exposes a rich type system by which the programmer can make safe abstractions around unsafe code that can't be misused, but it doesn't (and fairly fundamentally can't, thanks to Rice's
269.
▲
by
gpm
5mo ago
> and this is safe code, The code they are complaining about is not safe code, it is unsafe code that exposes a supposedly but not actually safe interface. They demonstrate this by using the interface to get undefined behavior. You can s
270.
▲
by
gpm
5mo ago
If they've mapped the surface of the water relative to themselves... couldn't they slowly wade in and just calculate the depth based on that 3d model without extra sensors. Assumes there's no abrupt cliff to fall off... but s
More ›