gpm

4 ms·

31.
by gpm 29d ago
Edit: Removed incorrect claim that |B| > |A| sufficed for the counter example. It's also the definitions the book supplies though (and the standard ones). Mathematics works over definitions. Everyone is free to do math over whatever
32.
by gpm 1mo ago
I like the framing in the headline - really more than the article itself. I think underappreciated in discourse like this is that of course we will still have "mathematicians" - people whose work is mathematics. The job might chan
33.
by gpm 1mo ago
The sovereignty perspective here is the perspective of the sovereignty of the states that make up Europe not the sovereignty of the entity of the EU/Europe. Though not every sovereign state has an army, see Iceland, Costa Rica, theoret
34.
by gpm 1mo ago
Batteries are rapidly improving (on many metrics, but the relevant one here is increasing in energy density). The range is apparently 125 miles electric, and 500 miles as a hybrid. That's not enough for Melbourne Sydney. Give it a co
35.
by gpm 1mo ago
Has yet to catch up to Claude-451 from a couple of months ago.
36.
by gpm 1mo ago
Yeah, I can see that. The aptera design has flexible panels molded to the body under the clear aerodynamic shell. It shouldn't suffer from aerodynamic losses but the panels probably lose efficiency from heat.
37.
by gpm 1mo ago
To reduce hassle? To make it work when you live in a place where you park on the street and can't run wires to the car?
38.
by gpm 1mo ago
In the Starbucks example wouldn't there theoretically be a defamation claim against the person who lied about you - just with absurdly small damages that aren't worth pursuing.
39.
by gpm 1mo ago
Does Chinese hardware mean fabbed in China or designed in China and fabbed by TSMC?
40.
by gpm 2mo ago
Huh, why would it shatter if the power goes out?
41.
by gpm 2mo ago
Yeah, did some googling after WarmWash's comment and I concur.
42.
by gpm 2mo ago
Ah but if you have the kind of money where this is a reasonable retirement hobby purchase, you aren't bothered by representing yourself as a "enterprise" :P
43.
by gpm 2mo ago
I think the problem is that the original recommendation here was "just use an LLM" not "use an LLM [in this responsible manner]". As an anecdote: I know people currently preparing to file suit against a former roommate w
44.
by gpm 2mo ago
They do offer API services to individual users... though with a set of models that makes it unlikely that you want to use it. They are promising Qwen 3.8 27B any day now though*. if you have the money as an "individual user" to p
45.
by gpm 2mo ago
There's a few more details at the bottom of this page: https://www.cerebras.ai/blog/introducing-cerebras-cs-4 44GB on-chip-sram * 3 chips. Per chip: 43.2 PB/s memory access + 53.5 PB/s on-chip fabric ban
46.
by gpm 2mo ago
I'd think the infrastructure would tend towards factories, smelters, and so on. Industrial things that have reasonably high power demands, can use the building, and don't care about the lack of windows. They're typically not
47.
by gpm 2mo ago
I mean the product is a server rack and while there's no advertised price I would assume it's six figures. So yes, an enterprise product. But even an enterprise is going to care about the difference between "we can run the mo
48.
by gpm 2mo ago
Is it just me or is it bizarre that they're advertising old open-weight models. GLM 4.7 (December 2025) not 5 (Feb) 5.1 (April) or 5.2 (June). 5.3 (4 days ago) is, to be fair, not open weights yet... but there's a lot since 4.7. K
49.
by gpm 2mo ago
Has the commission confirmed that these changes "resolve Apple’s disagreements with the Commission" or is that just like... Apple's wishful thinking. I definitely recall previous iterations where Apple announced changes to co
50.
by gpm 2mo ago
Your mistaken, words have meanings, I understood perfectly, I'm sorry you did not write the comment you meant to but intending to write something other than what you did does not mean you did so.
51.
by gpm 2mo ago
> It is of course different from ATT because it doesn't involve third-parties whatsoever. [and] It draws on data from Apple's first-party apps. [and] It draws on data from Apple's first-party apps. Your original comment do
52.
by gpm 2mo ago
Ok, let's break down your claims one by one and compare to the text of the FAQ... > Apple didn't give itself better dialogs. On the contrary page two of the FAQ states "The design of the PA prompt differs from that of the
53.
by gpm 2mo ago
Nothing on page 1 of the faq supports any of the assertions in your comment.
54.
by gpm 2mo ago
What "The German regulator" did is definitely not based on what they do in the rest of the world.
55.
by gpm 2mo ago
30% doesn't seem anywhere near as low as it should be though... I'd say that qualifies as "so many". That said I question both your and grandparents choice to look at only people who chose to vote. 68% of people who coul
56.
by gpm 2mo ago
Punishing apparent ideological enemies is a long standing mechanism for fascists and dictators - and scientists in the US qualify. It's an attempt to make people fear standing against them. Destroying sources of truth is a long standin
57.
by gpm 2mo ago
Eh, I think it'd favour whoever has the bigger media apparatus running other accounts supporting them... which also seems like a weird decision.
58.
by gpm 2mo ago
No, coding does not make ethical issues immaterial. Nor does it justify your behavior of harassing someone to do something that they've clearly decided not to do for ethical reasons on the basis of criteria that they have clearly rejec
59.
by gpm 2mo ago
I think it's very clear that someone who has checked out all the models but the one that called itself mechahitler and is explicitly being fine tuned to support far-right politics is making the choice for reasons other than performance
60.
by gpm 2mo ago
I'm curious what they mean by that too... They might be trying to weaken the cyber capabilities... Or I guess they might mean safety evaluation and hardening of the open source (and perhaps closed source Chinese) software ecosystem...

More ›