Y
HN Search
Hacker News Search
new
|
comments
|
top
|
jobs
gowld
searching PlanetScale…
1.
▲
2.
▲
3.
▲
4.
▲
5.
▲
6.
▲
5 ms
·
61.
▲
by
gowld
2mo ago
One question I have about ARC-AGI-3 is how much it depends on vision ability, which has a substantial hardware component that isn't "General" "Intelligence". What happens if the game is encoded in a non-visual logic
62.
▲
by
gowld
2mo ago
You wrote: > > It's the cumulative knowledge of all general human intelligence, baked into an artificial form, which can then use that knowledge to achieve novel goals. But it (currently) can't solve puzzles like ARC-AGI-3
63.
▲
by
gowld
2mo ago
Or Sundar wanted Demis to change to work on other things.
64.
▲
by
gowld
2mo ago
"Solar PV with storage = solar PV installation paired with four-hour duration battery storage, scaled to 20% of the output capacity of the solar PV." Sometime the sun goes away for more than 4hrs. That may be OK for closed-ended s
65.
▲
by
gowld
2mo ago
It's a lot easier to automatically detect a match to 1 specific thing than detect a match to a completely novel thing that offends sensibilities in a similar way to other things.
66.
▲
by
gowld
2mo ago
That's solved by either private monopoly charging money to fund investment, or public monopoly raising taxes to fund investment.
67.
▲
by
gowld
2mo ago
It's a lot more complicated than that -- Solar is great for discretionary, opportunistic, and time-shiftable additive demand, but not for replacing all-day baseline load. Using solar to dip into baseline demand sometimes is catastrop
68.
▲
by
gowld
2mo ago
No, Flock plays a semantic game where data on Flock's servers os "owned" by the client, so Flock is not responsible for the content or management of the data.
69.
▲
by
gowld
2mo ago
Solve what problem? My hammer can't drive screws. Is that a problem to solve?
70.
▲
by
gowld
2mo ago
> In any research phd course you're actively told to bite off something small and likely to be provable so that you can prove it (and publish it). But that's the start of math research, not the end. The point is to get practi
71.
▲
by
gowld
2mo ago
Did you know that "revolutationary" is not equivalent to "useful", and "revolutionary" is quite ambiguous?
72.
▲
by
gowld
2mo ago
What you are doing is "motte and bailey". The motte is "AI useful". The bailey is "Singularity is nigh".
73.
▲
by
gowld
2mo ago
Why does Twitter show a reply "Yah" from a random fan? xcancel shows a whole stream of thoughtful discussion.
74.
▲
by
gowld
2mo ago
The WalMart Waltons are a "family" At the core, "Family-owned" just means nepotism is preferred over merit. (The mob is also "Family-owned")
75.
▲
by
gowld
2mo ago
better: before submitting the code, ask LLM to quiz you for understanding the code.
76.
▲
by
gowld
2mo ago
> The problems that are found internally, or via security reviews and pentests we pay for, are ones that we fix before releasing. Either you didn't mean what you wrote, or you are saying that you never find problems internally after
77.
▲
by
gowld
2mo ago
That's an incredibly deep misunderstanding. Almost as bad as saying that human is the same as a tree because we're both made of carbohydrates and proteins.
78.
▲
by
gowld
2mo ago
> people's jobs, What people's jobs? There are no people.
79.
▲
by
gowld
2mo ago
> Claude.ai was better than Claude Code Why is this something users have to distinguish? Why can't these generative AIs choose good names for things?
80.
▲
by
gowld
2mo ago
That's the dream. It's easier to redesign the work to be robot-friendly than to deploy a humanoid robot and have it actually work.
81.
▲
by
gowld
2mo ago
No one has any idea how to achieve something like this.
82.
▲
by
gowld
2mo ago
Have you built the things described in those papers?
83.
▲
by
gowld
2mo ago
The stuff they invent isn't what's in the papers. The progress in AI is in the engineering hurdles.
84.
▲
by
gowld
2mo ago
They wouldn't be if Google hadn't published "Attention is all you need".
85.
▲
by
gowld
2mo ago
No, he didn't tweeted about "making sure" of anything. Elon tweeted "I’ve asked the SpaceXAI team to preserve any rare books in a library and scan them the hard way vs just cutting off the spine and scanning" which
86.
▲
by
gowld
2mo ago
How is that different from traditional research publication? It's faster?
87.
▲
by
gowld
2mo ago
That video clearly states that they have always placed great emphasis on product safety and information security, and that they kindly request that all users refrain from making dangerous modifications or using the robot in a hazardous mann
88.
▲
by
gowld
2mo ago
Is your definition of "finance sector" "everyone who likes money"?
89.
▲
by
gowld
2mo ago
Then why are people so worried about the paper not surviving?
90.
▲
by
gowld
2mo ago
Everyone who refused to buy these books in the past was voting for the books' destruction by default. Authors don't owe you a copy of their work. Bookstores don't you real estate to hold a book you don't want and will ne
More ›