gosub100

14 ms·

331.
by gosub100 7mo ago
This is another way they rip off consumers. In a perfect world, the license would be resalable for someone else, just like you can sell a used Blu-ray. During piracy cases, they clamor about their "intellectual property". Ok so th
332.
by gosub100 7mo ago
why shouldn't we all be as ruthless with Gates' Epstein connections as he was with all his competitors in tech? After all, he was a fierce competitor .
333.
by gosub100 7mo ago
datacenters need to run at night too, so they can put us all out of work.
334.
by gosub100 7mo ago
he should be cancelled. I dont buy anything said about his "foundation", it's just a money laundering operation.
335.
by gosub100 7mo ago
There's exceptions all the time. They turn back because a warning light came on. They saw a deer on the runway, a passenger got up to the bathroom. There's no way that could be automatic, plus they often need atc to look at their
336.
by gosub100 7mo ago
> We can do this, in a democracy. In a democracy where corporations have 0 representation, I would agree with you. However, they do have representation in a way that is invisible to see and impossible to quantify. And it goes beyond citi
337.
by gosub100 7mo ago
I dont disagree with anything you have written in the above reply. But why does democrats' reversal somehow annul or invalidate the claim about trump? Do you honestly believe it could all be an overly-embellished fable? If you do, then
338.
by gosub100 7mo ago
The resistance to the release of the files including redactions and outright refusal of Congressional order is enough to reveal the magnitude of what's going on. I would even dare say this Iran war is in part due to blackmail gained on
339.
by gosub100 7mo ago
There's a prisoners execution paradox here. If PM said there's a 95% chance, then Iran knows that too, and can prepare. Making them a worse target.
340.
by gosub100 7mo ago
I agree. this is about US corporations using the government to protect their business moat. But 300M citizens can't use the government to ensure we have access to a doctor. It's sickening. China would be such a great competitor at
341.
by gosub100 7mo ago
but what about the interruption when the satellite crosses over the horizon? you would then need a 2nd antenna that was ready to take over, or tolerate several seconds of lost signal.
342.
by gosub100 7mo ago
my assessment of the situation: "we've spent so much money on AI's promise to give us 5x, 10x returns, that now we have to earn it back by foisting the burden on developers to make up the gains by working harder, at least e
343.
by gosub100 7mo ago
It makes sense, to drum up as much interest and mystique as possible to for marketing purposes.
344.
by gosub100 7mo ago
You are using the fact that government officials are inept, inefficient, and corrupt to imply there is some big secret that somehow nobody else knows? Do you claim this absence of evidence is actually evidence of some fantastical claim?
345.
by gosub100 7mo ago
And phased-array antennae. The network would be next to useless if each receiver needed to track the satellite physically.
346.
by gosub100 7mo ago
Space is big. Really, really big.
347.
by gosub100 7mo ago
Yes if you hold a camera and capture the speed and position of the ball and wheel you can gain an edge, people have tried it. Good point.
348.
by gosub100 7mo ago
Roulette uses a physical process and is not compromised.
349.
by gosub100 7mo ago
That doesn't answer my question. My claim is that people working is efficient.
350.
by gosub100 7mo ago
Banning AI does increase efficiency. It makes it more efficient for a working class family to afford to survive. What perverted definition of the word were you considering?
351.
by gosub100 7mo ago
I would love to hear the Bluetooth engineers battle it out. I know BT isn't the only reason people want wired, but it's got to be one of the aggravating factors. Is it the specs fault? Hard to believe if they have gone through at
352.
by gosub100 7mo ago
Bad example. You are agreeing that copyright is owned by the people whose work an AI agent is trained on. Sure, come take a class of jobs, and then pay them in perpetuity to license the exposition of their work. For 75 years after the aut
353.
by gosub100 7mo ago
so the jobs have to be lost _first_ , then we can ban it?
354.
by gosub100 7mo ago
I want reverse age verification that lists the ages of every social network post. I think a lot of people that criticize social network toxicity don't realize their interlocutors are half their age. It's not one-to-one, meaning ma
355.
by gosub100 7mo ago
This was the thing the saws-all (or whatever it was called, the brake that stops you from cutting your fingers off with the table saw) tried, right? I don't know if it succeeded but the idea was a government mandate for an otherwise go
356.
by gosub100 7mo ago
posting the video directly for those who prefer that format https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lPUBXN2Fd_E as an aside how small the world is: I know-a-guy who knows-that-guy.
357.
by gosub100 7mo ago
The stepping was done years ago when Epstein got kompromat on him. That's why he ordered this war for no apparent reason. His life is over if he doesn't, his life lasts a few more years if the blackmail is withheld, at the cost of
358.
by gosub100 8mo ago
It doesn't help anyone. The user just depends on it to fix their English. And it makes a monoculture where every ESL user sounds exactly the same.
359.
by gosub100 8mo ago
Is it the same reason as Worcestershire mapped to "wooster" ?
360.
by gosub100 8mo ago
I hate the guy personally, but still understand that at that scale, if the leader is so conservative that s/he never risks losing, they are already losing. Like airline manufacturers never investing in jets because early ones weren&#x2

More ›