Y
HN Search
Hacker News Search
new
|
comments
|
top
|
jobs
gopowerranger
searching PlanetScale…
1.
▲
2.
▲
3.
▲
4.
▲
5.
▲
6.
▲
16 ms
·
91.
▲
by
gopowerranger
11y ago
(t)csh is more likely available and the default on all Unix machines, which is the root of FreeBSD. iirc, bash must be installed everywhere else and is not as readily available except on Linux.
92.
▲
by
gopowerranger
11y ago
The database isn't the problem but packages trail ports, cause they need to be tested first, so their dependencies may differ and cause issues. So mixing the two can cause an issue until you're experienced enough to know what to w
93.
▲
by
gopowerranger
11y ago
I find it odd to be put into a bash shell. You don't need to guess where config files are. Unlike Linux, they're in the same place and documented in 'man hier'. For my workstation, I don't have a need for jails (or
94.
▲
by
gopowerranger
11y ago
tcsh is the default for root on freebsd and should always be used when working as root.
95.
▲
by
gopowerranger
11y ago
Of course, you must wait for implementation. As I said in another post, you must still test in the browsers to make sure they work but to only use a property available in one browser, or to write code and test in only one browser (the subje
96.
▲
by
gopowerranger
11y ago
Yes, really. You're saying the same thing I am, Geoffrey. Sort of. I expect browsers to render the same way as the spec says it should. I then verify in each browser. When they don't, I adjust, but I never write code, only test in
97.
▲
by
gopowerranger
11y ago
>at the moment tons of web-developers are targeting Chrome only. I'm a web developer and, in my 11 years of doing this, the only people I've ever seen do that are those experimenting with a new feature that only works in Chrome
98.
▲
by
gopowerranger
11y ago
What you mean "we"? Much of this is just excitement added to a boring life, or curiosity, and should not be confused with "admiration". After watching or reading about such mobsters, I find I am disgusted, and hope I nev
99.
▲
by
gopowerranger
11y ago
I will reiterate, you absolutely don't understand the history and geopolitics, despite having lived here, and, no, the point I was trying to make was not about the school districts but about statistics defined by the city but given as
100.
▲
by
gopowerranger
11y ago
And with good reason. I don't know where things are with his software and methods today but, last I heard, djb's software and methods are world class ideas that everyone should be using.
101.
▲
by
gopowerranger
11y ago
It's not true of many other cities. There are only about three to five others in the USA with the unique separation of city and county government that St. Louis has. In case you don't understand, the city is not part of any county
102.
▲
by
gopowerranger
11y ago
I don't think you can but that wasn't my point.
103.
▲
by
gopowerranger
11y ago
In this case, they're not. Specifically, FBI crime data only only covers the city, so often used in news stories, only covers the city which, if it weren't for the state separating the city and county in the 1850s, would have also
104.
▲
by
gopowerranger
11y ago
This is true of any spam filter. You either have it set as too aggressive or you don't. You either put up with spam that gets through or you check your spam box more often. Google's is better than most.
105.
▲
by
gopowerranger
11y ago
Anything that's not PHP.
106.
▲
by
gopowerranger
11y ago
Like most people, your links confuse people by combining St. Louis city with St. Louis county. However, St. Louis county is not part of St. Louis city. The statistics, such as this and the too often ballyhooed crime stats, are falsely skewe
107.
▲
by
gopowerranger
11y ago
In almost every case, confusion arises when the "how" is taught with no explanation of the "why". Why does that formula work? Why did you use that formula? Whole worlds were opened up to me when I learned that the fundam
108.
▲
by
gopowerranger
11y ago
A lot of posts here are mixing "look the same" with "function the same". Familiarity is fine when it comes to function but to look the same is boring.
109.
▲
by
gopowerranger
11y ago
I was going to make a "kids these days" remark after looking at that article, too.
110.
▲
by
gopowerranger
11y ago
Read all of that tweet and you'll find out how irrelevant it is.
111.
▲
by
gopowerranger
11y ago
I still have that book and just saw it yesterday when I was looking for something else.
112.
▲
by
gopowerranger
11y ago
Your idea is already in place. The regulations state you cannot cause interference but people still modify their devices to do so anyway.
113.
▲
by
gopowerranger
11y ago
There is nothing in that FCC paper that says you won't be able to change the operating system and that is specifically mentioned in section 24.
114.
▲
by
gopowerranger
11y ago
I'm not ignoring it at all. It's my point that, if those CBers couldn't modify their equipment, many of those issues would not have come up. Being an illegal operator is a different story unrelated to this topic.
115.
▲
by
gopowerranger
11y ago
You are pretending such things I mention don't happen but they happened all the time before the FCC came into being and happened often during the CB craze. In fact, I still occasionally hear of such things. Imagine there were no regula
116.
▲
by
gopowerranger
11y ago
It does NOT restrict you from modifying the software. Read section 24. "The Commission proposed that certain changes in layout, included components, operating software, or variations in overall electrical or mechanical constructions th
117.
▲
by
gopowerranger
11y ago
Years ago, when CB radio was all the craze, manufacturers would publish manuals with amplifiers tell you NOT to move a certain wire to a certain place because it would change the frequency or boost the power beyond the legal limits of CB op
118.
▲
by
gopowerranger
11y ago
If you want to jail offenders then there has to be a law or regulation for that. This is that regulation. How does this harm society? Imagine your wifi router becoming useless cause your neighbor decides to modify his and boost his output w
119.
▲
by
gopowerranger
11y ago
People aren't paying attention to what this is for. It's to prevent people from modifying RF devices, transmitters, from operating at power levels and frequencies, or other technical things, from interfering with other devices and