goodSteveramos

16 ms·

61.
by goodSteveramos 3y ago
Do you think this team invented that idea? Im struggling to understand how large their contribution is.
62.
by goodSteveramos 3y ago
The author seems to confuse what an alloy is with the shape of a metal part. The alloy is the chemical composition, the shape is just the shape. The basis of comparison is likewise flawed. It seems like they compare their shape printed in t
63.
by goodSteveramos 3y ago
>no way to credibly verify that the genetic samples were given with full consent Is there evidence to believe these specific tests did not have consent or are the journals saying that the fact that these studies were done in China is rea
64.
by goodSteveramos 3y ago
Sorry i meant to say that you think he’s guilty . And if you’re not a cop, who’s word are you taking that it’s easy to “not end up like Chovin”?
65.
by goodSteveramos 3y ago
Are you a cop? Thats great that you think Chovin was innocent. Cops disagree and thats why lots of them quit after that
66.
by goodSteveramos 3y ago
This is just a link to the Wikipedia page on police unions. Where is there evidence that police unions prevent good candidates from being hired?
67.
by goodSteveramos 3y ago
Calling crime in the 80’s and 90’s a “norm” is quite the soft on crime position you have there and no, crime is still much higher than it was before the derik chovin conviction. Im not sure why you are bringing up covid in this context
68.
by goodSteveramos 3y ago
>If cops quit because they want to stand in support of a convicted murderer then they definitely don’t belong in the force. Its not that they are quitting to “stand in support” of Derik Chovin, they are quitting because they dont want th
69.
by goodSteveramos 3y ago
“Desktop Environment” does a fantastic good job of explaining what kde is
70.
by goodSteveramos 3y ago
Facial recognition is not a substitute for the thousands of cops who quit in the wake of the Derick Chovin conviction. Say what you will about the merits of that prosecution, but the message cops themselves got was that if they actually do
71.
by goodSteveramos 3y ago
Does anyone have a detailed explanation of how these studies were unethical? Its all quite vague.
72.
by goodSteveramos 3y ago
They aren’t going after drugs they are going after people for their political beliefs. Remember when the IRS audited every organization just for having the word “patriot” in their name?
73.
by goodSteveramos 3y ago
Brave Search is just as good as DDG in my opinion.
74.
by goodSteveramos 3y ago
Fascinating thank you
75.
by goodSteveramos 3y ago
“Everything else has a lot of overhead because nothing is developed in house“ How does doing less result in more overhead?
76.
by goodSteveramos 3y ago
Those already exist. The problem is the Mozilla organization has all the money and they piss it away because they are controlled by corporate types who care more about not pissing off their past and future bosses at Google more than pushing
77.
by goodSteveramos 3y ago
I’m not a monarchist, but couldn’t you say the same thing about people born in other countries to yours? (eg: that they have fewer rights in your country than you)
78.
by goodSteveramos 3y ago
Do people in Western countries who call themselves “monarchists” really judge their own beliefs by definitions invented by liberals? I’m not familiar with anyone who calls themselves that so I’m all ears.
79.
by goodSteveramos 3y ago
Because we can change the law based on our feelings of fairness so talking about where laws came from is not irrelevant as you bluntly asserted.
80.
by goodSteveramos 3y ago
Acid rain is not caused by co2 for sure. How big a deal is ocean ph falling? Wasnt it lower than now a few million years ago?
81.
by goodSteveramos 3y ago
“Goody-2’s self-righteous responses are ridiculous but also manage to capture something of the frustrating tone that chatbots like ChatGPT and Google’s Gemini can use when they incorrectly deem a request breaks the rules.“ I don’t know the
82.
by goodSteveramos 3y ago
Im skeptical about this solar shield thing but how big of a problem is CO2 on its own? (without climatic effects)
83.
by goodSteveramos 3y ago
Why?
84.
by goodSteveramos 3y ago
If you personally believe in freedom of speech, then you will give your political opponents a platform to disagree with you and debate them on the merits (if any) of their arguments. This principle of honor is what motivated the first amend
85.
by goodSteveramos 3y ago
Don’t be coy. This isn’t about one academic falsely accusing another of faking a specific measurement. This is a political activist calling an entire field of research fraudulent because its conclusions don’t conform to his political belief
86.
by goodSteveramos 3y ago
Where do you think laws come from?
87.
by goodSteveramos 3y ago
Thats not how anything in science works. You should be able to express your beliefs without having absolute proof and get fined if a court doesn't agree with you.
88.
by goodSteveramos 3y ago
Right, as is fining them millions of dollars for disagreeing with you. I’m honestly fine with that, my complaint is the hypocrisy of conflating political actions with science.
89.
by goodSteveramos 3y ago
If you criminalize people’s incorrect beliefs then you are doing politics and not science.
90.
by goodSteveramos 3y ago
The amendment is just one minor manifestation of a very fundamental cultural value. People who do not believe in freedom of speech will often excuse curtailment of it when such curtailment is not prohibited by the amendment, as freedom of s

More ›