godelski

16 ms·

301.
by godelski 5mo ago
> Whoever slows down will get eaten by some hungry upstart that is willing to work 996 to eat the incumbent’s lunch. I hear this a lot but it seems another old saying is still true today: why is there always time to do it twice
302.
by godelski 5mo ago
You're exactly right that this is mafia tactics. Clearly people are buying into it to It would be a shame if someone else got the top result >> When making more money requires degrading the product you know we've fucke
303.
by godelski 5mo ago
I don't on that exact search but I do see it when I try this in the iPhone App Store. I do also see it on my Android when searching the Playstore. It was an example. You're getting lost in the weeds. Similar to this saying BuT sOm
304.
by godelski 5mo ago
Let me repeat myself >>>> When making more money requires degrading the product you know we've fucked up
305.
by godelski 5mo ago
> but Search is still the consumer facing product that brings people to Google and keeps them there. And let's not forget, these are the same people that when searching for "eBay" will put an ad at the top of the r
306.
by godelski 5mo ago
> I’m in favour of projects like these - even on spending taxpayer money on them. Even a few hits is extremely valuable. I mean the US's investments in CERN and ARPA sure lead to way more economic activity and resultant tax
307.
by godelski 5mo ago
> But new world is getting pretty old now too. 200-300 years isn't that old. There are plenty of buildings older than that all across Europe. There are businesses older than that. There are businesses and buildings that were
308.
by godelski 5mo ago
1) The flight markets are different now. There's been a large increase in both transatlantic and transpacific flights, especially the latter. These change the economics of considering only these types of flights, flying only over uninh
309.
by godelski 5mo ago
> This is as pie-in-the-sky as it gets. All your critiques are things we heard about Starlink too. "Oh, you're just reinventing Globalstar[0], which already failed. What makes you think this time will be different?&quot
310.
by godelski 5mo ago
I cannot find an interpretation that is an addendum. They are telling me I'm wrong
311.
by godelski 5mo ago
> is an astonishingly rare policy Let me repeat for you part of the * FIRST SENTENCE* in my comment >> common in "the new world" So > Nonexistent in Europe Last I checked, Europe was not "th
312.
by godelski 5mo ago
This is over a hundred year old rule and common in "the new world". You can guess why it is common if you think about the phrase I put in quotes. All these countries are composed of immigrants... Here's a short and incomplete
313.
by godelski 5mo ago
I think she violates her own rules. It also doesn't help that the music gives that forbidding feeling and sense of disaster. Even if well intentioned she ends up doing the very thing she is criticizing. Emotion precedes analysis... A g
314.
by godelski 5mo ago
We'll see. Who knows. But at least the profits won't be benefiting the person directly committing the offenses, right? I won't say if that's good, but it's at least a bit better, right?
315.
by godelski 5mo ago
Those don't seem like the best links, especially that Asimov one. Link inside the Asimov link tells a much better story, with consistent behavior. > Maybe you have to still be alive to matter? This is certainly part of the eq
316.
by godelski 5mo ago
Asimov wrote about it[0], and talked about it quite a bit. So did Sagan. If you haven't watched Cosmos in awhile it might hit a little different these days, for multiple reasons (not all bad). The book is great too. Not to mention Saga
317.
by godelski 5mo ago
Were I to guess they're talking about the different derivatives. Here's at least something that might introduce you to some of the shortcuts people take but it's far from complete [0] (you can probably find more if you search
318.
by godelski 5mo ago
I think part of it is that one side throws rocks and so it never even matters was is in the article. It becomes a battle if the article is good or the article is shit. Yes, I'm tired too. I want you have real discussions about these th
319.
by godelski 5mo ago
It's why the invention of teaching has been so important. Took a long time for humans to develop calculus. A long time to then refine it and make it much more useful. But then in a year or two an average person can learn what took hund
320.
by godelski 5mo ago
> Humans aren't going to come up with "new-dimensional" innovations in every field, every single year. In fact, they are more rare. Specifically because they harder to produce. This is also why it is much harder to
321.
by godelski 5mo ago
> And those hippies don't need to wear masks They do. Go look up Portland ICE protests and you'll see tons of people wearing inflatable costumes. Guess what, those cover your face and make it hard to get you on film. Th
322.
by godelski 5mo ago
> it was at the time nowhere near sufficient to to deliver L4 autonomy It still isn't. Show me a video based only vision system that's even L3. Current systems like Waymo are using video, radar, and lidar. Even lidar is
323.
by godelski 5mo ago
FYI, Karpathy has 2.5M followers on twitter, Anthropic has 1.3M (OpenAI has 4.8M, for comparison). I'm sure Karpathy will be doing mostly research and will make real contributions, but I also think it would be naive to ignore the weigh
324.
by godelski 5mo ago
That's not the question. The question is how much you need to give the best team of researchers to beat $100m+ worth of compute. $1m of compute? $10m? Clearly giving the best team $100m is going to beat out giving an efficient group $1
325.
by godelski 5mo ago
I think the point is that language is compressed. There's a lot conveyed in very little. Yes, it is ambiguous, but that's exactly the feature that makes natural language useful. It's also why it is so much easier to speak wit
326.
by godelski 5mo ago
Sorry dude, 84 stars isn't that much. It's a good number, be proud, but I wouldn't go boasting about it like you're some hotshot. https://www.star-history.com/?repos=kstenerud%2Fyoloai&type=...
327.
by godelski 5mo ago
> No, it just means Microsoft is bad at products FYI, that's what people are saying...
328.
by godelski 5mo ago
> The Claude TUI itself is broken. I mean this is also true. You forgot the third option, that 1 and 2 are true (and 4th, that neither are). Seriously, the Claude TUI fucking sucks. I don't know how anyone thinks otherwise.
329.
by godelski 5mo ago
I use claude every single day at work. I've burned hundreds of dollars a week in tokens. But I still think you're being too defensive while attacking Philip. I'm sorry, but you need to look yourself in the mirror. You didn&#x
330.
by godelski 5mo ago
> I don't want to offend (it's AI coded anyway :)) but that does not scream "high quality" to me. Honestly, I think this is where the big divide is. People have massively different opinions on what "qua

More ›