gnzoidberg

7 ms·

31.
by gnzoidberg 6y ago
Absolutely not. Do you want to directly reward newspapers for attacking individuals and companies? I'm sure that's going to end well. That would be a perverse incentive. Right now the link is very loose and that's fine.
32.
by gnzoidberg 7y ago
Because it has to work 100% reliably. (And the thinner atmosphere.)
33.
by gnzoidberg 7y ago
Huh? They must have been joking. There are many cases with models that are good enough that you can calculate the gains depending on the desired response. I have done it many times.
34.
by gnzoidberg 7y ago
Careful with that question. I have been programming for 25 years and love it, but you won't find me solving just any puzzle just for fun. I think you are right overall, but depends on how you ask. I like programming puzzles but hate th
35.
by gnzoidberg 7y ago
This is a very good point. The definition I would use is not selling your time , where my income is not just a multiplier of the hours I put in, even if the multiplier is high.
36.
by gnzoidberg 7y ago
Thanks to PG for writing this. I will never have kids and I don't want them (I'm old enough to know for certain). But I appreciated this essay. It's good to know what I am giving up.
37.
by gnzoidberg 7y ago
Ew. Isopods are gross. Questionable naming here...
38.
by gnzoidberg 7y ago
Absolutely. That's the first thing I laughed at. Why are people downvoting you? On the other hand, it may be just a big joke. But is it?
39.
by gnzoidberg 7y ago
The chart is the worst thing in that article. That hilarious line through the middle! Is that suppose to show some kind of trend!?
40.
by gnzoidberg 7y ago
Why is this here?