gnaritas

63 ms·

571.
by gnaritas 10y ago
> Solving this mystery would likely be the most significant turning point in human history. I can't imagine how; most people will simply dismiss it and continue praying to their Gods and scientists already believe what it would prov
572.
by gnaritas 10y ago
> I've started counting the minutes that I use in a day just logging in to things with our SSO, because it has started to actually add up, haha. It has gotten silly. I have a similar setup, and I don't waste any time logging in
573.
by gnaritas 10y ago
Yes, but then you aren't doing things in your own account with temporarily elevated privadledges which is the intent of UAC, it's supposed to be like sudo.
574.
by gnaritas 10y ago
sudo as root is unnecessary, sudo only makes sense for non root accounts; and sudo prompts the user for his own password ensuring that even someone that walks up to your computer can't perform root actions just because you're logg
575.
by gnaritas 10y ago
That's because UAC in windows is worthless, it's a broken version of sudo that fails to do the one thing necessary, force a re-authentication of credentials. There's little point in popping up a warning than people can simpl
576.
by gnaritas 10y ago
It is possible, that's how I do it, and it doesn't really affect performance at all. You just don't do it real time, the triggers just kick an id into a queue and you have a background task work the queue updating the materi
577.
by gnaritas 10y ago
A team of excellent people will still have someone at the bottom of productivity on that team; that doesn't make them a low performer. I think you're confusing poor performance with ranking. If you have 10 awesome developers, are
578.
by gnaritas 10y ago
That wasn't' a violation of his right to free speech, so there's no reason anyone would be vocal about it. CPAC isn't the government.
579.
by gnaritas 10y ago
Free speech includes being an asshole and not being jailed for it; it doesn't include the absence of other consequences.
580.
by gnaritas 10y ago
There's no difference between the two in regards to morale; you'll encourage gaming of metrics in either case. You shouldn't fire people simply for being lowest performer on the team because there will always be a lowest and
581.
by gnaritas 10y ago
> However, I think if I had a reliable income that was measured and paid out in BTC, then the answer would be yes. I think you haven't thought it through if you still think that. 2BTC is currently worth just over 2g in dollars. In
582.
by gnaritas 10y ago
Would you sign a 30 year mortgage denominated in BTC? I don't think so, it's neither a good unit of account or store of value. Looking back at the past when you know the previous value is not a good test; looking at the unknown
583.
by gnaritas 10y ago
I implied no such thing, read what I wrote 50 times if you must until you see that I merely said treason is a serious crime, not a distraction. I didn't not imply he was guilty, we don't know that one way or the other; hence the i
584.
by gnaritas 10y ago
I haven't implied that, you're simply reading what I'm saying via partisan eyes. I merely stated treason is a serious crime. And no, Clinton's campaign is not the real issue. She lost, that's over, no one is questi
585.
by gnaritas 10y ago
No, I implied that treason is a serious crime, nothing more. I do not know if he's guilty or not, that's why there's an investigation. There's enough shady shit clearly going on that the truth has to be found.
586.
by gnaritas 10y ago
You cant' seem to get over the incorrect idea that the dems are just being sore losers; that's childish and not at all what is occurring.
587.
by gnaritas 10y ago
You're again trying to fly off on a diversion of the topic, I'm not playing. This is not a discussion about Obama, period. Nor are public speeches that influence foreign countries remotely comparable to collusion to affect "
588.
by gnaritas 10y ago
> Here are the facts of today: None of those three facts are remotely relevant to whether or not Trump colluded with Russians, you are again being partisan and even mentioning those unrelated facts proves you're too partisan to have
589.
by gnaritas 10y ago
Because you're deflecting from the topic. If you can't discuss Trump without deflecting to Hillary, you're not acting in good faith and having a real discussion. Not to mention that you're repeating claims that's be
590.
by gnaritas 10y ago
> then is it really an issue if they coordinated with them Yes, it is. > How is it any different than hiring a PR firm based in another country? One is treason, one is not.
591.
by gnaritas 10y ago
Treason is not a distraction, it's as serious as a crime gets.
592.
by gnaritas 10y ago
Keep in mind he only has a 35% approval rating, most American are bothered greatly by what's going on. He also lost the popular vote, so he won even though more people voted for someone else.
593.
by gnaritas 10y ago
Such a deflection of the topic is unworthy of hacker news. Trump is the president, discussion about Trump's negatives are not an excuse to deflect with "what about Obama", he is not the topic. Giving a speech is in no way c
594.
by gnaritas 10y ago
> What exactly are we investigating? Collusion between Trump/team and Russia. It's one thing for Russia to mess with an election, it's a vastly different thing if the campaign coordinated with them to do it.
595.
by gnaritas 10y ago
Not without shutting down free trade agreements and becoming protectionist, which virtually everyone agrees is a bad idea.
596.
by gnaritas 10y ago
> We really need to take a good hard look at globalism. Or capitalism in a global economy.
597.
by gnaritas 10y ago
Seems to agree with me, however, I don't need a study to know that legally preventing people from copying other people, prevents all of those other people from making progress. Patents make copying into theft, but copying is not theft.
598.
by gnaritas 10y ago
The question you're asking your grandma isn't the issue they're concerned about. The quesiton they're asking themselves is if I go against my party, how is this going to affect my re-election. That's why we have p
599.
by gnaritas 10y ago
> Medicare for all would cost 2.5 - 3 trillion a year. Isn't that assuming current costs for care don't change? Seems a bad assumption since medicare for all would cost less than health insurance for all and be a much more effi
600.
by gnaritas 10y ago
Patents are a protection racket that prevent progress; if they can make a generic version cheaper, good, that's how it should be. If people prefer the genuine thing, they'll buy it. Patent holders aren't the victims, they&#x

More ›