gloryless

6 ms·

31.
by gloryless 6y ago
That's 100% true, exhibit "ant man". But felt like he was leading to the actual math before paywall. Comes down to a probabilistic existence, and exhibiting characteristics based on other particles being present or not presen
32.
by gloryless 6y ago
This was so bizarre. It was like... Describing the basics of strategy, and saying what strategy should be, but then never actually discussing anything but mission orientation. The whole "stack" thing was meaningless, ripped from t
33.
by gloryless 6y ago
This is damn interesting. I've seen a couple reads on the Russian elections but never seen it turned to the US. I think it would have to get a deeper analysis with more fine grained data but seems like it's got some solid indicato
34.
by gloryless 6y ago
sorry mate, most of these complaints come from a bunch of misunderstandings, mostly "this is not how I'd do things." Worse is saying you come from web then explaining why this engine running a completely different domain is &
35.
by gloryless 6y ago
Funny, Hannah and twilight zone in my building too. Wouldn't surprise me if they have some titles sprinkled through where they have no content
36.
by gloryless 6y ago
I don't think it is. In my experience this attitude produces poor work and is a drain on the rest of the team.
37.
by gloryless 6y ago
Nice work. I really appreciate acknowledging the landscape and sharing that work before putting your own into the mix. Underrated step
38.
by gloryless 6y ago
It hit a note for me too. It's a microcosm for all of the internet. On one side list of talented people doing interesting stuff, on the other some fuckin thought-leader-wanna-be shitposts to hackernews "this is bad because I don&#
39.
by gloryless 6y ago
He's definitely trying to explain something, he just isn't sure what it is
40.
by gloryless 6y ago
This is a great example of bad writing. I think you have an inkling of a premise, but spread it weakly across three paragraphs while muddling through your feelings and misunderstandings about models. You never actually define or defend a po
41.
by gloryless 8y ago
Usds never "had it", it's always been handled by MULTIPLE contractors. This last version one contractor works on backed, one works on frontend, one is responsible for documentation and testing, and none of them communicate.
42.
by gloryless 9y ago
The tone of this whole post tells the actual story.
43.
by gloryless 9y ago
Did you even try to play this out in your mind?
44.
by gloryless 11y ago
Amazing work! I love the thought that went into the artwork
45.
by gloryless 12y ago
After "defining module:" the page doesn't load.
46.
by gloryless 12y ago
The phrasing should be along the lines of: "life originating outside of the planet earth." If we found evidence of life on a moon or comet or asteroid, you would still lose the bet. The current phrasing says "on another plane
47.
by gloryless 14y ago
Mine's called ShitToDo.rtf
48.
by gloryless 14y ago
I misread the title as teaching CS to "Undeserving Kids." I thought, that's a little strange, but I wanna see how these little shits are getting some CS knowledge. But, the real idea is a good one.
49.
by gloryless 14y ago
1. We die because we accept it. 2. < dramatic pause > 3. ???? 4. Enlightenment
50.
by gloryless 14y ago
Closed systems. Entropy is a hard to defend answer.