gloosx

34 ms·

511.
by gloosx 2y ago
Thanks god all the critical infrastructure in my country is still on MS DOS!
512.
by gloosx 2y ago
They are not willing perhaps? Why cannot they?
513.
by gloosx 2y ago
>employees $5k to $10k per day at current full comp market rate WTF. Is this really not trolling? I make that in a month
514.
by gloosx 2y ago
It is not comprehensive to compare actual JS frameworks and UI/state management libraries. Obviously React will eclipse the frameworks since it is a simple interface library used by the frameworks themselves (like Next.js or React Nati
515.
by gloosx 2y ago
It is really common for both Redux and React to be mistakingly labelled as frameworks by the people who don't really understand that these are libraries providing specific narrow piece of functionality leaving the architectural decisio
516.
by gloosx 2y ago
I was working in a YC startup which was part of this gold rush. At first I was very impressed with an infinite money glitch they discovered. Just find desperate people who lost their jobs during the pandemic, promise them a new job, collect
517.
by gloosx 2y ago
Even with a strong password – my laptop today can do 1100 MH/s which makes it quite feasible. One of the potential attack vectors can look like this: a malicious actor takes this and reskins the UI, then hosts and does the marketing, h
518.
by gloosx 2y ago
The security of this is somewhat questionable. On client device the notes are stored in plain text, so even another user from the same machine can read them. For syncing it also sends a `username+password+salt` SHA-256 hash to the server, t
519.
by gloosx 2y ago
I wonder if they made horizontal 50/50 split possible. It is so freaking odd they decided to implement vertical 50/50, but flipping the variables and making a horizontal 50/50 is a no-no. Like no-one at Apple ever used a port
520.
by gloosx 2y ago
yeah, just a couple of them, like 11 core html attributes and 25 additional html attributes, oh, also some events and also a JavaScript API. So easy to remember compared to 7 scary react hooks.
521.
by gloosx 2y ago
>This could include requiring telcos to alter the 5G encryption standards that protect mobile communications to facilitate government surveillance. I laughed so hard at this :D Really funny stuff... >So it makes no sense that the Cana
522.
by gloosx 2y ago
This looks really cool but a bit incomplete and messy without XML-like syntax sugar for composing component functions. Is it even possible to extend Go like the JSX?
523.
by gloosx 2y ago
I know a website even worse, globalsign which is selling code signing certificates. They are so deep into making shitloads of money out of thin air they stopped caring in 2002. This is the only website with a password field which ONLY allo
524.
by gloosx 2y ago
New flagship... This is becoming to look like a smartphone world, and Sam Altman is a Steve Jobs of this stuff. At some point tech will reach saturation and every next model will be just 10% faster, 2% less hallucination, more megapixels fo
525.
by gloosx 2y ago
Have to agree with most of the commenters here, framework-agnostic really means independent of any framework. This one is built on top of the CSS framework which adds a whole build step. So it was really better to go with a less misleading
526.
by gloosx 3y ago
> Before JavaScript it was impossible to make this mistake Before JavaScript it was impossible to even implement such functionality on the client side... There was no "number" input before HTML5 spec which came out in 2008, and
527.
by gloosx 3y ago
Clearly the dev responsible for the input made a mistake, but why does it extrapolate into that javascript hatred? Like, before javascript is was impossible to make a mistake? The whole web was a perfect place without an issue?
528.
by gloosx 3y ago
I can't buy into this essay really because it does not show me which code was ported, probably because it was such a shame to even show it to the public. It seems to me that react application was made terrible from the beginning, and I
529.
by gloosx 3y ago
I don't get it. It seems to be an html where magic happens via attributes, and it just looks ugly to me. Looking at the reference - the third Core™ attribute is literally for calling arbitrary JavaScript inside an HTML attribute tag wh
530.
by gloosx 3y ago
I have to admit: you're perfectly right here. React of course always relied on mutable state in it's implementation – just so we don't have to. I derailed a lot here to keep this funny thread going ;) I'm still not with
531.
by gloosx 3y ago
It all seems right, except the reducer function does not mutate the fiber object. Your function is certainly not pure, it boldly mutates the outside state via increment operator. It is incorrect to extrapolate this on how fiber works. The d
532.
by gloosx 3y ago
Given function is pure, for any given input state, it will return state + 1, the state is an accumulated result of all invocations, there are no arguments nor external factors that would cause it to behave differently. There are no side-eff
533.
by gloosx 3y ago
free cheese is only in a mousetrap ;)
534.
by gloosx 3y ago
Dunno, "no one" is a bit exaggerated, vinyl records market is growing every year. Of course, due to really cheap and bulky storage devices available today people all around are collecting movies and music , maintaining their colle
535.
by gloosx 3y ago
This reducer is certainly pure, you are confusing it with `st => st++`
536.
by gloosx 3y ago
Before you sold it to anyone it will only create bills. Development is such a minuscule part of a successful startup
537.
by gloosx 3y ago
This not really correct, the useReducer hook is not some external state which is smuggled in. It is an actual input for the reconciler which defines an output of this component, so it is perfectly functional even by your definition.
538.
by gloosx 3y ago
To be as a long-time react.js user – these examples look like a kinda weird mix of declarative with some bitter imperatives. Like, foo.set depending on foo.get and having to manually set element innerText inside the side-effect, eww, I can
539.
by gloosx 3y ago
this is quite secure but not against thermorectal cryptoanalysis though
540.
by gloosx 3y ago
naah, there still will be certain patterns and they will be recognisable. once something sora 1.5 level of ability is there – definitely reverse-sora model which can recognise ai-made videos should be possible to train as well

More ›