gklitz

14 ms·

121.
by gklitz 2y ago
.com domains get blocked too. Any security based on the assumption that a site is good or bad based solely on the tld is a complete failure.
122.
by gklitz 2y ago
Depends on what you mean by significant. I’d say that at the very least I save 5-10min per hour using copilot when coding, and several times I’ve had tasks like “convert this untyped schema less json solution to a typed solution” which was
123.
by gklitz 2y ago
Hunter2
124.
by gklitz 2y ago
> and he intended to forward the money to them. That’s just a cop out and we all know it. Let’s not pretend like scammers aren’t scammers be used they might pass some money after the fact to “good causes”. If you inject a fund collecting
125.
by gklitz 2y ago
I might be misunderstanding what was embeeded, but since the author stating that they put the is in “as a joke” in the same context they were explaining that they basically were not working on behalf of entropic and “just doing it cause I w
126.
by gklitz 2y ago
It’s like someone walking into a random restaurant seeing your food on the counter, taking it to your table then pocketing your tip. You’re “just doing the waiters job for free” and “just soliciting donations” but in reality you are abusing
127.
by gklitz 2y ago
There’s a clear difference between highlighting security concerns and doing things for financial gain. If they’d have used the passwords to drain peoples bank accounts then we’d also be talking about it as a serious issue.
128.
by gklitz 2y ago
Calling something that’s trying to fool people into tipping into a crypto wallet controlled by the person who inserted it an Easter-egg is really stretching it. It’s obviously trying to insert the potential for financial fai into the softwa
129.
by gklitz 2y ago
As always this is so much more than merely a video debunking. It’s a great piece of comedy, an insightful analysis of technology and even great commentary on the historical development both back when the video was made but also the now curr
130.
by gklitz 2y ago
What? The entire point is that it’s no coincidence in this unit set. Saying that changing units indicates a coincidence is like saying that if we see Trump suddenly driving a Tesla after Elon stated throwing money at him, that must be just
131.
by gklitz 2y ago
Isn’t that the entire point, that it means “I’m ready but I don’t know about the other person”? If the first person was not ready they would say “no” because they know that they can’t possibly both be ready. Since the first person says “I’m
132.
by gklitz 2y ago
The top comment does no such thing. It specifically mentions dairy cows.
133.
by gklitz 2y ago
> The ultimate root cause ended up being me. I have led the compliance team for the past several years. The fact this went unnoticed in our many reviews during that time shows that we need a different approach to both our internal invest
134.
by gklitz 2y ago
> Since individuals rarely have a complete overview of the entire system. I think the key phrase you are missing which is repeated many places in the timeline is “Engineering was not consulted”. His failure wasn’t that he doesn’t know th
135.
by gklitz 2y ago
What do you mean comma? csv uses tabs. /s
136.
by gklitz 2y ago
> enabling bad cultural practices I strongly disagree. There is nothing culturally bad in a system issuing an error if there is an error. Sometimes systems issue errors that are considered noise by supporters because they are not actiona
137.
by gklitz 2y ago
> going from one to another valid expression is often faster if you can go through invalid expressions. I still don’t think you really comprehend what an invalid expression is in this case. Ñ¥æd huiåp xiip ææææOP. It won’t make anything
138.
by gklitz 2y ago
It isn’t illegal, that’s the point. For political reasons an initiative was created to “hunt Chinese Innovation theft” and that initiative needed to go after “someone” so they looked through what hints they could find and went after people
139.
by gklitz 2y ago
I mean sure, you either need an app for it, or a piece of paper, but that’s no different from before cashless, the difference is that before I had to get manual extracts from my bank and go through them myself, and now I have an app that au
140.
by gklitz 2y ago
Proofs by contradictions are still expressed in valid math. Invalid math is when you start giving answers like “1.3(4æ87+^%<[{“, that is completely disregarding syntactical and consistency rules of the language you are using to express y
141.
by gklitz 2y ago
> I can remember my parents sitting down with a cheque book which had a transaction log at the back, and all of their receipts and logging those so that they knew their exact balance at a given time and knew how much they'd got left
142.
by gklitz 2y ago
> Moving to cashless has made things harder to track How so? As I see it, if anything it has made it extremely easy to track things.
143.
by gklitz 2y ago
> The classical approach was to understand how genes transcribe to mRNA, and how mRNA translates to polypeptides; how those are cleaved by the cell, and fold in 3D space; and how those 3D shapes results in actual biological function. Do
144.
by gklitz 2y ago
I’m still not really getting used to the whole theme of engagement hacking comments but great example of using the Streisand effect to boost replies on your comment by incorrectly labeling it a. Perverse incentive. Bravo.
145.
by gklitz 2y ago
Any politician pirring forth this stupid statement needs to be asked if they are willing to submit to having their lives filmed 24/7 with no censorship of anything. They won’t even let us see their “private” messages to other politicia
146.
by gklitz 2y ago
This feels like one of those game adverts of someone intentionally playing a game poorly because it’s a good engagement hack. People discussing actual mathematical theorems isn’t going to get any engagement, so you have to throw in somethin
147.
by gklitz 2y ago
Calling it 1% is a bit extreme, but yes fruit and vegetables as a stable part of your diet is a significan cost in western city living.
148.
by gklitz 2y ago
What part do you think is bad?
149.
by gklitz 2y ago
I think you’re misreading what he’s saying. Let me translate from lawyer speak to regular speak “Yes I knowingly broke the rules and got caught, but I don’t feel it was that serious, though I’ll admit the mistake if we can settle it with mi
150.
by gklitz 2y ago
If you are spending 10$ a day on Starbucks and your net after a month is -1000$ sure, cutting the coffee won’t save your budget, but that’s no reason not to cut it, and it’s not “just an emotional decision”. The idea that no individual smal

More ›