Y
HN Search
Hacker News Search
new
|
comments
|
top
|
jobs
gklitz
searching PlanetScale…
1.
▲
2.
▲
3.
▲
4.
▲
5.
▲
6.
▲
10 ms
·
61.
▲
by
gklitz
2y ago
Neither PO nor lead dev thinks AI is cool, but it’s a priority from top level management so it has to be put in one way or another.
62.
▲
by
gklitz
2y ago
Being unbiased yourself does mean listening to both sides. What an off request that you would want to hear only from one party and then only additionally neutral parties but not hear from the other side at all because of “bias”.
63.
▲
by
gklitz
2y ago
You forgot the part where cars list price is 400% as much as the cost the insurance actually pays to get you the new car, making it near impossible for normal people to buy a car outside of the insurance system.
64.
▲
by
gklitz
2y ago
Interestingly the push to reduce fat, which led to increased sugar coincide with the onset of the obesity epidemic. But of-cause correlation isn’t causation.
65.
▲
by
gklitz
2y ago
Any fool on a hill can confidently state that they don’t believe in gravity because there’s no proof for it and the matematisk theories are all complicated and bureaucratic. Why should he believe it? But so what?
66.
▲
by
gklitz
2y ago
Maybe I’m confused about why OP is confused, but doesn’t this all just boil down to the fact that the second exception happens during the first exception so naturally the co text of the second exception contains both things “before” and aft
67.
▲
by
gklitz
2y ago
Mathematica is the application. Wolframlang is the language. They are both extremely impressive each in their way, but they aren the same.
68.
▲
by
gklitz
2y ago
The fact that one person can easily take a cup of water from a lake does not mean the lake supports for every person to take a cup. In fact, if everyone had tried to take that cup, then there wouldn’t even be a lake for the one person to ta
69.
▲
by
gklitz
2y ago
Written assay evaluation is not and has never been an effective evaluation. It was always a cost saving measure because allocating 30min face to face time with each individual student for each class is such a gigantic cost for the instituti
70.
▲
by
gklitz
2y ago
It varies of cause, but here the doctor just sends you home with a monitor exactly identical to the one they use at the office. But it’s not like there’s a world of difference to the ones you could buy yourself at a resonable cost.
71.
▲
by
gklitz
2y ago
That anxiety is more present in the first of the readings than the last, so you get an indication if that’s affecting the reading too. You don’t have to be able to filter it out entirely to know if the reading has diagnostic value.
72.
▲
by
gklitz
2y ago
> Is the blood pressure really being measured "correctly" in all those studies? Or not? This is why you do readings three different times a day for several days. And why there’s instructions on how long to dust still before the
73.
▲
by
gklitz
2y ago
I have always and continue to feel this view of “food is an escape for cuz” model is wrong in line with the the “it’s about lack of will power” we are seeing with all these glp-1 drugs that are helping people that a big proportion of our po
74.
▲
by
gklitz
2y ago
I’ll assume that you are American, so you obviously don’t understand how tone deaf that suggestion is to the current thread. Imagine someone commenting on horrible Auschwitz’s is after they visit and someone commenting “you should visit the
75.
▲
by
gklitz
2y ago
It’s a layered joke. It has one side.
76.
▲
by
gklitz
2y ago
I think this is an extremely important piece of scientific work that explores an element I feel like I have encountered throughout my life. However I fear it will be ignored because the bias is too strong in our society. People simply canno
77.
▲
by
gklitz
2y ago
Illusion is a word that indicates something appears one way but is in fact another. It’s the very first word of the title and the article starts out explaining exactly why it appears to be an illusion. The article doesn’t try to explain tha
78.
▲
by
gklitz
2y ago
> No. It's that when people who prefer type systems go to use a popular dynamic language, they try to drag in features that they like from other languages. Very much. The “problem” people try to solve with things like dependency inj
79.
▲
by
gklitz
2y ago
Thank you for being honest about making the exact mistake they are trying to help out with this. I’ll restate what I posted elsewhere, I have never come across anyone who actually wanted to write a bare except, only people who thought naive
80.
▲
by
gklitz
2y ago
They are literally trying to depreciate a feature that regularly breaks user space because it’s unintentionally misused. I don’t think I’ve ever come across a use case where people actually intended to write a bare except. Anyone who ever d
81.
▲
by
gklitz
2y ago
> if you think you would rather send an AI to attend a meeting for you rather than waste your time, your life, on that meeting, consider just taking it to email That’s essentially what I’m doing when sending an AI. We don’t use zoom, but
82.
▲
by
gklitz
2y ago
Don’t take it personal. By mistake you created a comment that is stating a blatant falsehood. And people are downvoting that blatant falsehood. That’s a statement it the fact that the comment is false. It’s not an attack on your person, it
83.
▲
by
gklitz
2y ago
5 billions in losses on 3.7 billions in revenue. So yes OpenAI is losing money, but they are looking at a valuation of 150 billion, so they could easily get investors to fund the losses, but of cause the case for investors has to be “invest
84.
▲
by
gklitz
2y ago
Part of the reason is exactly so the talent gets easier liquidity on their stakes. Sucks to have been part of building the success that OpenAI is only to not be able to get anything significant out of it just because the company is a cappe
85.
▲
by
gklitz
2y ago
The point is that OpenAI (the for protists) won’t die from not having invested AGI, they have an extremely profitable opportunity from “just” selling api calls and consultant hours. But that just brings them a successful shovel seller, not
86.
▲
by
gklitz
2y ago
He never said he didn’t care about money, he said he didn’t care about making a lot more money at a point when he had tons of money. Like you might say “I don’t really need another car we already have 8 at home between the two of us driving
87.
▲
by
gklitz
2y ago
You have cause and effect flipped. The non-profit didn’t try to oust Sam because he was getting the non-profit to disengage from OpenAIs capped profit entity, that makes no sense and he can’t do that, he can’t stear the hand of the non-prof
88.
▲
by
gklitz
2y ago
That’s not what happened at all. There’s non-profit and for profit entities have always been selerate. The non-profit didn’t train anything, it invested money in the for profit to “further the mission towards agi” what’s happening now is ju
89.
▲
by
gklitz
2y ago
They are engaging with a lot of industries that could see their work generate immense value directly without needing to change the base services. If they end up being essential in cutting out half the costs in Clinical trials for drugs, the
90.
▲
by
gklitz
2y ago
> He is not required, but absent an explanation, a jury might think him guilty beyond a reasonable doubt. That’s just plainly insane. Absence of proof of innocence is not proof guilt. It’s not even suggestive of proof, let alone proof wi
More ›