gitanovic

8 ms·

91.
by gitanovic 6y ago
While I really do like this, I cannot avoid remarking that python starts to look more and more like perl
92.
by gitanovic 6y ago
That's exactly why there is a black market for 0-day exploits... because they are worth more than what are paid by the companies owning those liabilities
93.
by gitanovic 6y ago
I as a parent can understand that, but what it was asked is how to read a lot of books if you have kids I think the answer is: you have to decide what activity you want to trade for that.
94.
by gitanovic 6y ago
On the other hand, if they cought them all, in the long run society will remove the funding, actually leaving us without an "immune-system" There is a balance to be achieved
95.
by gitanovic 6y ago
That's only true if you assume a even distribution. If you cluster them the scenario is a bit different (your conclusion might still hold anyway)
96.
by gitanovic 7y ago
Some have the never get cancer solved (I read that about chickens... but I can't remember where)
97.
by gitanovic 7y ago
Simply because we reached a state where we can. And also, we evolved a brain that led us here, so why not?
98.
by gitanovic 7y ago
Very true. But still, in the current situation fencing might actually be a good thing: a boost in research in the right direction. Also if temporary, it might be just enough to make the step needed, and it is anyhow better than nothing.
99.
by gitanovic 7y ago
Yes carbon tax would be a good thing, but it has to be part of a balanced tax-intervention, and the benefit is a slow down on the collision path, but we need something to reverse the direction, and carbon tax is not it, is just buying addit
100.
by gitanovic 7y ago
This analysis has quite a few assumptions in it, for example the carbon-tax might (and should) not come "alone" and many of the things stated can be tamed increasing social spending, subsidizing basic needs etc. With the net effec
101.
by gitanovic 7y ago
Very clear explanation, love the diagrams. To me this is a more sensible way than carbon tax, or even better use carbon tax to fund research like this. I don't think that economic incentives alone might fix the situation, and maybe not
102.
by gitanovic 7y ago
The website looks a bit amateurish at best
103.
by gitanovic 7y ago
I'll just take care to bring either chewing gums or tape. Problem solved
104.
by gitanovic 7y ago
The audit looks actually legit, but still they are located in a 14 eyes jurisdiction, not really the best for privacy
105.
by gitanovic 7y ago
I had exactly the same thought interesting "coincidence"
106.
by gitanovic 7y ago
> Europe trying to make Americans not to talk about past crimes of EU citizens? This is just b t
107.
by gitanovic 7y ago
I don't agree, the article is unilateral, but it has very sound arguments
108.
by gitanovic 9y ago
this to mefeels like an unpaid advertisement from freelance.com reason being that the report feels bogus, and is posted were lots of skilled labor can be found