gipp

54 ms·

481.
by gipp 10y ago
If you rephrase your hysterical wording as "major bipartisan concern across every intelligence agency and nearly all ranking members of both houses of Congress, including the heads of both Intelligence Committees," then I'm n
482.
by gipp 10y ago
You said "Agreed" then said the exact opposite of what the parent said.
483.
by gipp 10y ago
The "distance" referenced in your quote is not distance in a sentence, it's the distance between points in this abstract embedding space. Two completely different things. The Chomsky argument isn't really relevant here.
484.
by gipp 10y ago
If you regard particle-wave duality as an "issue" that needs to be "solved," (other than perhaps "duality" being a poor choice of term) you're really approaching this from a strange and incorrect perspecti
485.
by gipp 10y ago
Yeah that's all well and good until major corporate/governmental networks are infected, which has already happened on small scales.
486.
by gipp 10y ago
Yeah, I think leavers should retain their capital and still be capturable. Plenty of people leave right before they lose; the game seems to give you a few grace turns but it's often not enough.
487.
by gipp 10y ago
55-60 units which could, in principle, have been used for 60 tiles instead for even higher production than that. basically favor easy expansion over castles. Start taking them once you're out of open territory or once you hit good ch
488.
by gipp 10y ago
I saw that you can _use_ WASD, but it doesn't say anything about queuing them.
489.
by gipp 10y ago
This was really fun! Couple notes: * In the tutorial, if you capture the city before the message about capturing it comes up (which is the most intuitive thing to do), the message just disappears instantly and you don't learn what citi
490.
by gipp 10y ago
By most definitions, people have been building hierarchical NNs of many different kinds for years.
491.
by gipp 10y ago
No, these are innovative _techniques_ for designing and training networks. What you're describing are just good _applications_ that "look cool".
492.
by gipp 10y ago
You've got it the wrong way round. Amazon doesn't allow you to post your affiliate links on sites you don't control.
493.
by gipp 10y ago
Brilliantly succinct expression for a complex problem.
494.
by gipp 10y ago
That's a little simplistic, don't you think? The article was more about the resurgence of a particular subculture than about culture at large. "Intellectual discourse," however you define it, is something that affects la
495.
by gipp 10y ago
Seems pretty ridiculous to assign blame for the lack of compromise to one side or the other. Where are the rightists "reaching across the aisle"?
496.
by gipp 10y ago
You're gonna have to elaborate -- usually Twitter's "firehose" means the entire unfiltered stream of all Tweets, which would be beyond useless as a normal user for obvious reasons.
497.
by gipp 10y ago
I'm not sure what you're talking about? Free speech is about legality of speech; nobody's talked about locking anyone up for supporting a candidate.
498.
by gipp 10y ago
There is no such thing. Even if only through the selection of events considered "newsworthy", reporting news _always_ implies a particular narrative of the world, and politics is nothing but competing narratives.
499.
by gipp 10y ago
Am I the only one who feels this is the wrong question to be asking? Having the goal of "creating a startup" leading to the search for a problem seems backwards. Entrepreneurship happens (or should happen) as an _effect_ of the st
500.
by gipp 10y ago
Not a new sentiment, to be sure, but probably the best articulation of it I have seen.
501.
by gipp 10y ago
> Take it in for what it's worth. It's a signal from a sea of noise, nothing more. His post is the very definition of "taking it for what it's worth".
502.
by gipp 10y ago
Anime images are not "generally popular" with 12-30 year old males.
503.
by gipp 10y ago
Perhaps because this exact article gets rewritten and republished every 3 months or so. Sort of just out of things to say about it.
504.
by gipp 10y ago
He's right, it _does_ already have a name. A few, in fact. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Goodhart%27s_law https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Campbell%27s_law https://en.wikipedia.org&#x
505.
by gipp 10y ago
The typical approach is something like a tree kernel ( https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tree_kernel ). Looked into them briefly for a work project that never got off the ground, can't say too much about using them in p
506.
by gipp 11y ago
Yes, but a sanely designed package manager will at least require that to be a new, versioned release. _Already published_ versions of a package should be immutable.
507.
by gipp 11y ago
Network effects are a hell of a thing.
508.
by gipp 11y ago
This is awesome! (However, talk about a back-button hijack)
509.
by gipp 11y ago
This post and thread are a trainwreck.
510.
by gipp 11y ago
Usually when it's hard to tell that's because it applies to both. The differences between the two are really not that large.

More ›