gilded-lilly

7 ms·

31.
by gilded-lilly 4y ago
I think that can limit creativity though. Look at Albert Einstein. I don’t think he had much of a formal education, certainly he was not involved with any institution when he wrote his groundbreaking paper. Sometimes, being involved in big,
32.
by gilded-lilly 4y ago
Sure, but I think it’s like being a sports commentator vs a competitor, or a film critic vs a director. Tarantino, Van Gough, Jimi Hendrix (and the like) all achieved greatness without any institutional backing or education, as far as I’m a
33.
by gilded-lilly 4y ago
Yeah, it’s pretty dumb. Science is fundamentally objective, art is fundamentally subjective. That’s a solid distinction. I think the idea of studying art is wrong in and of itself. It’s interesting and possibly useful from a technical/
34.
by gilded-lilly 4y ago
I think you’re making a bit of a false comparison here. How about this. Your house may be on fire. But no one knows. So we’re going to install martial law, and silence anyone who is of the camp who believes the house is not on fire, for two
35.
by gilded-lilly 4y ago
My idea rests on the fact that there are such things as “non-human” moves, I.e moves that a human could not calculate. It’s these that we’re interested in, and an AI should be able to “learn” to detect them, (as these types of moves will oc
36.
by gilded-lilly 4y ago
Well yes, China agrees with you. That’s kind of how they run their whole country.
37.
Can someone help me come up with anti-cheat chess AI?
1 points by gilded-lilly 4y ago|2 comments
38.
by gilded-lilly 4y ago
Interesting. You may be right - in fact, I’d never considered filling up on broccoli or other calorically thin ingredients to suppress hunger. I was just working on the assumption that hunger is the body’s response to caloric deficit (in th
39.
by gilded-lilly 4y ago
No, that’s not how this works. You don’t restrict scientific debate or prevent people from speaking. We’re better than that.
40.
by gilded-lilly 4y ago
I once lost 17kg (50 pounds) by caloric restriction (500cal deficit per day). I’ve got news for you: you will be slightly hungry most of the time. Meals will be the highlight of your day.
41.
by gilded-lilly 4y ago
That brought tears to my eyes.
42.
by gilded-lilly 4y ago
Increased instrumentation/data could also lead to bias in the data through increased volume. I’m sure there’s a name for this effect.
43.
by gilded-lilly 4y ago
I’ve noticed this too. I think “habit forming” might be a better phrase - coupled with potential impacts to life, divided into positive and negative impacts (positive such as tooth decay, impacts on physical and mental health; negative such
44.
by gilded-lilly 4y ago
Sounds dangerous. What if there’s a power surge?
45.
by gilded-lilly 4y ago
The “vomit comet” (American equivalent of this) has autopilot for yaw and roll only.
46.
by gilded-lilly 4y ago
“Addictive” only applies to substances which cause physical withdrawal symptoms - coffee, cigarettes, xanax, heroin, alcohol. But drugs such as methamphetamine and cannabis technically aren’t addictive because they don’t cause any physical
47.
by gilded-lilly 4y ago
One of my pet peeves is the oft repeated slogan “it’s not addictive”. And by definition, that’s true. But neither is Methamphetamine. But people still throw it around like it’s some kind of scientific blessing that you can’t form a dependen
48.
by gilded-lilly 4y ago
No mention of whether the emulator is easier than the original, nor whether his score was still the high score in the emulator.
49.
by gilded-lilly 4y ago
The problem I have with SAP, as someone who works in a service desk environment, is that it seems universally slow to migrate/replicate to user’s devices once they’ve had it allocated. I don’t know why this is, but it’s a pattern I’ve
50.
by gilded-lilly 4y ago
I have no experience in solving these types of puzzles/no background in math. Is it something I should be able to do?
51.
by gilded-lilly 4y ago
Without spoiling anything, has anyone here solved it? I have no idea where to start. The answer I get for layer 1 seems ridiculous (just two characters).