gildas

35 ms·

1. 361.▲
   by gildas 11y ago

   Regarding SPA-based websites, as long as your site has only a few pages, these results are relevant. I would like to see the same kind of test on a site with 1000+ pages for example. I already did this kind of test in the past and it was fa
2. 362.▲
   by gildas 11y ago

   How many pages does the site have?
3. 363.▲
   by gildas 11y ago

   I am wondering why v0.js is compiled with Babel if Google really wants the JavaScript execution to be fast.
4. 364.▲
   by gildas 11y ago

   Out of curiosity, was the server side rendering the cause of this issue?
5. 365.▲
   by gildas 11y ago

   Sorry if I sound pedantic but the major gain seems to be related to the use of a cache. It is never said that "React apps render much quicker on first load". Actually, the author almost admits that its application was taking 500ms
6. 366.▲
   by gildas 11y ago

   > isomorphic React apps render much quicker on first load source?
7. 367.▲
   by gildas 11y ago

   > but it's pretty easy to deduce. Indeed, I would try to make bots display the value window.chrome to verify this assertion.
8. 368.▲
   by gildas 11y ago

   > Google bot is a headless vesion of chrome I highly doubt this is the case, what is your source?
9. 369.▲
   by gildas 11y ago

   I am the co-founder of SEO4Ajax and I can confirm that, everyday, I see Ajax sites which are not properly indexed on Google because their bots can't interpret JavaScript correctly, when they try to.
10. 370.▲
    by gildas 11y ago

    However, if you search on Google: "Property Prediction for Butane" site:https://www.chemeo.com You'll see this page is not indexed.
11. 371.▲
    by gildas 11y ago

    > You can also use the unary + operator to convert values to numbers: + "42"; // 42 > [...] However the "+" operator simply converts the string to NaN if there is any invalid character in it. Bei
12. 372.▲
    by gildas 11y ago

    I see the same behavior on windows 8.1 by keeping the up/down key pressed down.
13. 373.▲
    by gildas 12y ago

    I am sorry, I won't fork and fix this code because I don't need it currently.
14. 374.▲
    by gildas 12y ago

    Thanks for the advice, I was just a bit disappointed when I saw the downvotes. I promise I won't whine anymore. ;)
15. 375.▲
    by gildas 12y ago

    Then, I think it should be documented.
16. 376.▲
    by gildas 12y ago

    Great tool for educational purposes. However, it looks like that sometimes timeouts are not always executed in the right order[1]. [1] http://latentflip.com/loupe/?code=c2V0VGltZW91dChmdW5jdGlvbi...
17. 377.▲
    by gildas 12y ago

    The code is potentially vulnerable to XSS injections[1]. [1] https://github.com/sbstjn/timesheet.js/blob/master/source/ja... edit: Thanks for the downvotes, lesson learned! Never talk about vulnerab
18. 378.▲
    by gildas 12y ago

    Don't you think that implementing the Google crawling scheme [1] (i.e. returning a snapshot of an Ajax application) is a programming or programming tools question? [1] https://developers.google.com/webmasters/ajax-
19. 379.▲
    by gildas 12y ago

    For your information, the Google specification [1] is implemented in google, bing, msnbot, yandex, pinterest and mail.ru bots. Making the solution compatible with the other bots is a matter of adding 2 lines in the server configuration. [1]
20. 380.▲
    by gildas 12y ago

    > Questions that imply you're looking for better ways to spam also tend to fair poorly; can't imagine why. I do not follow you. > FWIW, legit SEO questions do have a home on SE: http://webmasters.stackexchange.com
21. 381.▲
    by gildas 12y ago

    Post a technical question about how to make your single page application crawlable, if it includes the word "SEO", there are great chances it will be closed. Some examples: http://stackoverflow.com/questions/2
22. 382.▲
    by gildas 12y ago

    Interesting and good to know! I was actually wondering if a JS redirect would suffice.
23. 383.▲
    by gildas 12y ago

    Another additional bonus of doing that is that you can serve "true" 404 pages (i.e. not soft 404) for invalid URLs when the page is requested with the _escaped_fragment_= query parameter.
24. 384.▲
    by gildas 12y ago

    You're right, my example was not very good indeed.
25. 385.▲
    by gildas 12y ago

    Hoisting is great thing, it is really helpful to improve readability when doing asynchronous function calls. function a(){ setTimeout(b, 1000); } function b() { setTimeout(c, 1000); } function c() { }
26. 386.▲
    by gildas 12y ago

    > Specific frameworks like React are great too. Except React is a library. The slogan [1] clearly says "A JavaScript library for building user interfaces". [1] http://facebook.github.io/react/
27. 387.▲
    by gildas 12y ago

    So, is the Espion headless browser based on an existing one? If this is the case, which one?
28. 388.▲
    by gildas 12y ago

    tl;dr use pjax [1] [1] http://pjax.herokuapp.com/
29. 389.▲
    by gildas 12y ago

    Shameless plug: this is the kind of feature SEO4Ajax [1] already implements for SPAs and Ajax websites. [1] http://www.seo4ajax.com/
30. 390.▲
    by gildas 12y ago

    It would be great if third-party provider like SEO4Ajax could be integrated in your service through a plugin/add-on mechanism (cf. like Heroku or Appfog).