giantg2

5 ms·

61.
by giantg2 2mo ago
Yeah, and appearently we don't know how to shield from radiation either.
62.
by giantg2 2mo ago
I used cheap as a relative term. But $10k for a ramp seems like someone got gouged. A couple hundred in lumber etc and a couple hundred for labor is doable in many cases. I see those wooden ramps at homes often.
63.
by giantg2 2mo ago
The author is simultaneously correct and incorrect. The author is correct that simple and cheap changes such as ramps and door knobs are the logical fixes. And yes, based on personal experience, companies hate disabled people at the first s
64.
by giantg2 2mo ago
"Only if the jury believes in nullification, which isn't common. The jury is instructed to follow the law." Not true. There is case law that allows for self-defense against unlawful use of force, or when when you reasonably b
65.
by giantg2 2mo ago
The choice in this hypothetical scenario is to be killed initially through the unlawful use of force or potentially be killed at some later time before reaching trial.
66.
by giantg2 2mo ago
"Even if they're wrong, you can't shoot back." Depends on the situation. You'd absolutely be arrested. Get in front of a jury of 12 people and you might have a chance if you have enough evidence for a self-defense c
67.
by giantg2 2mo ago
You might want to look into NGate.
68.
by giantg2 2mo ago
The accusation was not random. That writing had an AI tone to it with the bulleting etc, and didn't address the actual point being questioned.
69.
by giantg2 2mo ago
Well, why do people want to de-google? Likely peivacy and security. There is significant overlap in that reasoning and not doing tap to pay.
70.
by giantg2 2mo ago
Is this an AI response? I get why people want a de-googled phone. What I don't get is why they would want to use tap to pay, one of the payment methods with increased attack vectors.
71.
by giantg2 2mo ago
Don't you still have to carry cards for things that aren't digitally excepted, such as a drivers license in most states?
72.
by giantg2 2mo ago
Why would anyone who cares enough about security/privacy to run a de-googled phone want to use a tap to pay app?
73.
by giantg2 3mo ago
Number 2 is basically here for many things, but not as easy as a single checkbox. Number 3 is something I've thought about, but it seems that's never seriously discussed in politics.
74.
by giantg2 3mo ago
"They can collude, but that does not reveal more to them than most current age-verification methods." Or just correlate the IP.
75.
by giantg2 3mo ago
Is exposure to a tax app going to cause harm to a 5yo? This doesn't seem like a real problem.
76.
by giantg2 3mo ago
What might those be? Everything I've seen is ineffective or can be compromised. I think letting parents parent is probably the best option, but will require better/easier/free tools and education to help lock down different
77.
by giantg2 3mo ago
I tried to look at setting up an stripped down privacy-focused Android based box for Netflix, but ran into issues. Seems like you need to be spied on to run Netflix.
78.
by giantg2 3mo ago
I probably could, but haven't done so yet.
79.
by giantg2 3mo ago
My understanding is that Roku bypasses DNS blocking with hardcoded tables so it can report back on various data they track on you.
80.
by giantg2 3mo ago
So where can I get an actual privacy focused streaming box, even if the apps (Neflix etc) running on it are not?
81.
by giantg2 3mo ago
The problem is that digital IDs get recorded. The physical examples you give are generally not. The clerk at the ticket counter or entrance doesn't give a shit who you are, they just need the picture to match you and the DOB to 18+ yea
82.
by giantg2 3mo ago
I wonder if imposter syndrome affects people with ASD at higher rates, and if there's anything companies or individuals can do about it. The more I think about imposter syndrome the more it seems like it's more a result of the opi
83.
by giantg2 3mo ago
Are phones an exception? I've heard Brazil is a very mobile-first market.
84.
by giantg2 3mo ago
Im not sure what you're talking about
85.
by giantg2 3mo ago
Why Cape instead of Phreeli?
86.
by giantg2 3mo ago
Then why aren't STDs, TB, etc, eliminted. Even heavily vaccinated diseases are still around and pop back up occasionally. The only one eliminted was smallpox.
87.
by giantg2 3mo ago
"The ongoing loss of life and health due to HIV could be stopped if we cared enough to invest resources in wide-scale PrEP availability and public health education." It wouldn't be stopped, only slowed. You would still have t
88.
by giantg2 3mo ago
You'd have to show some evidence that he did conceal his IP, otherwise there should still be reasonable doubt. You can make up whatever you want without evidence, proving it is different.
89.
by giantg2 3mo ago
And the reasonable doubt would come from someone else could have used my account, does the service's account ID match the account ID for my user name, nothing was found on my devices, did the IPs match my known IPs, when did the access
90.
by giantg2 3mo ago
"he likely didn't have any experts to refute the prosecution's evidence." What evidence? They didn't have any other than a user name. An arm chair lawyer who watched too many shows could have created reasonable doub

More ›