Y
HN Search
Hacker News Search
new
|
comments
|
top
|
jobs
ghusto
searching PlanetScale…
1.
▲
2.
▲
3.
▲
4.
▲
5.
▲
6.
▲
22 ms
·
391.
▲
by
ghusto
2y ago
I think I get it, but it doesn't help the image that there are some who are so obviously abusing the system. Everybody knows who they are. Everybody can see what they're doing, how they're using their position to avoid puttin
392.
▲
by
ghusto
2y ago
The policy of people paying for homes then keeping those homes, even when, gasp, they get old?! Demanding that older people "downsize" is a policy, and not one that's very savoury.
393.
▲
by
ghusto
2y ago
Great to hear agreement that all this article manages to show is how sensible the AI Act is. No, you can't be irresponsible with AI in Europe, we've learnt the hard way what happens when there's no regulation early on.
394.
▲
by
ghusto
2y ago
Then this https://sindresorhus.com/command-x (same guy)
395.
▲
by
ghusto
2y ago
It's a product that I was willing to pay for (until I required native E2E encryption). _iCloud Drive_ is a feature, mostly — aside from the fact that you still have to pay for it to be useful, so kind of still a product. Steve Jobs was
396.
▲
by
ghusto
2y ago
I went in to hate-read, but ended up mostly agreeing. Mainly, I agree that the issue isn't ability being valued, but which abilities we choose to value. In a completely free market, abilities that get you the highest salary are what we
397.
▲
by
ghusto
2y ago
Cursor's AI is in my opinion superior. Copilot gets anything but the most basic things wrong or poor practice advice, and even basic things sometimes. Cursor's _interface_ on the other hand, is not great. I found it clunky and too
398.
▲
by
ghusto
2y ago
> there's a reason people keep using it I believe that reason is that they've figured out quality matters not at all when you're pitching to C-levels.
399.
▲
by
ghusto
2y ago
Okay Mao.
400.
▲
by
ghusto
2y ago
> Well, they'll transfer all they own into a corporation. They can't tax assets like that on business because it'll crash the economy super quick Thanks for that. I've always thought that wealth isn't taxed heavi
401.
▲
by
ghusto
2y ago
Depends if you work for a shit company or not. From the comments here, I think some have only _ever_ worked for shit companies. Other kinds of places do exist!
402.
▲
by
ghusto
2y ago
> They totally are plugged into screens I've seen a backlash in recent years. Most notably amongst techies, ironically, but more recently in the general public. People are waking up.
403.
▲
by
ghusto
2y ago
My prediction is that they will "continue" the product as a different product, maintaining the name. A bit like how the Macbook Air is still a product, whilst we all know it was discontinued some years ago.
404.
▲
by
ghusto
2y ago
If the vast majority aren’t interested, that’s a sign of success. Remember, it’s when they came that everything went to shit.
405.
▲
by
ghusto
2y ago
I trust science completely, it's all we have. I don't trust the people doing the science. In the same way that you can trust laws, but not most lawyers. Medicine, but not certain doctors. It's not the scientific method that&#
406.
▲
by
ghusto
2y ago
I called 100% BS on the last one (video games desensitise children to violence), "but this time it's different" ;) Moral panics are usually baseless, but this doesn't fit the usual mould. This is rather coming from the o
407.
▲
by
ghusto
2y ago
Every parent already knows this. I wonder why they're trying to disprove it so badly?
408.
▲
by
ghusto
2y ago
"I conducted a meta analysis of 46 studies and concluded that there is _no correlation with social media and teen mental health issues" What about the studies that that _do_ show a correlation, of which there are more than one. Wh
409.
▲
by
ghusto
2y ago
Don't know about "special or cool" (do _you_ think they're special or cool?) but it certainly tells me enough about the person to be more interested in hiring them. What they're saying is "I will not subscribe
410.
▲
by
ghusto
2y ago
I'm not here to "shit on" you, I'm here to tell you that _you_, in your current state, _do not need LinkedIn_. You don't need to attain some master-level of status for this. Get out there, go to real events, meet re
411.
▲
by
ghusto
2y ago
It'll make you miss engineering opportunities you don't want anything to do with.
412.
▲
by
ghusto
2y ago
_You do not need LinkedIn!_ I can not put enough emphasis on this. So many people think you can't be a professional without a LinkedIn account, it's depressing. Word of mouth trumps everything. Build up your _real_ social and prof
413.
▲
by
ghusto
2y ago
> 8 billion people growing their own food wouldn't be able to live in our planet even if they had all the necessary skills In the way we currently live, no they wouldn't. But it sounds like you're saying "wouldn'
414.
▲
by
ghusto
2y ago
> I don't know enough to separate the wheat from the chaff, and still barely understand what I'm doing. Many times one can succeed by blindly following a process without understanding, and over time that understanding arrives,
415.
▲
by
ghusto
2y ago
Yup, Firefox :)
416.
▲
by
ghusto
2y ago
Don't want to be that guy throwing word-turds at someone's actual work, but both ideas (making any webpage editable, and trusted err, well I guess webrings) have tried and died more than once. I can see how webrings died when soci
417.
▲
by
ghusto
2y ago
People have never asked me "but what's the battery retention like?!". I put it up for a price, people pay that price.
418.
▲
by
ghusto
2y ago
Either that or from a troll-farm.
419.
▲
by
ghusto
2y ago
I pay creators directly all the time (for all media, not just videos), so this confusingly common sentiment is irrelevent to me. With that out of the way; I would gleefully see YouTube disappear before I paid them a cent. Throwing money at
420.
▲
by
ghusto
2y ago
Here you go: https://freetubeapp.io/
More ›