ghushn3

9 ms·

91.
by ghushn3 1y ago
Yes. It still produces microplastics. It might be compostable or biodegradable in some environments, but we're a far distance away from from an environmentally safe plastic.
92.
by ghushn3 1y ago
"In some parts of the world ..." The world is bigger than the US, friend.
93.
by ghushn3 1y ago
Nobody likes plastic because it lasts "thousands of years". People care about storing food products well. If we can do that without lasting thousands of years that seems like a pretty good win.
94.
by ghushn3 1y ago
Definitely be careful before embarking on home distilling. In many parts of the world (and many parts of the US) it's pretty strictly illegal.
95.
by ghushn3 1y ago
I think he thinks he's blocklisted. I imagine he's very much not, and it just happenstance/coincidence.
96.
by ghushn3 1y ago
[flagged]
97.
by ghushn3 1y ago
The latter option being the one that is the best possible one.
98.
by ghushn3 1y ago
> I prefer if they kept it purely for the lulz because then it was art. Art can exist for the purpose of protest. Art can exist for the purpose of profit. Art can exist "for the lulz". Who made you the arbiter of art? Jeez, you
99.
by ghushn3 1y ago
It's only stealing from someone if you recognize that person as being the owner of the thing. If you are someone who does not believe in private property (note, this is different from personal property), then you haven't stolen
100.
by ghushn3 1y ago
You should hang more in anarchist circles. Squatting as a protest and as an art piece has been alive and well for far, far longer than I've been alive. (40-50 years) Go read about the Paris Commune, Villa Road, Pieds Plats, Frances S
101.
by ghushn3 1y ago
The moment the OP said "they were anticapitalist!" like this was some sort of terrible black mark on their souls it became very clear the story being sold was one sided. It reads very much like two parties got into one startup for