Y
HN Search
Hacker News Search
new
|
comments
|
top
|
jobs
ghurtado
searching PlanetScale…
1.
▲
2.
▲
3.
▲
4.
▲
5.
▲
6.
▲
4 ms
·
31.
▲
by
ghurtado
4mo ago
You haven't really lived until you've had to type this whole thing, aware of the fact that the all-caps doesn't change much, but they stay because the rage has to go somewhere Bonus points if you find yourself actually sayi
32.
▲
by
ghurtado
4mo ago
> you will have to constantly steer to follow constant bearing paths Is this why airline routes look like they are "hopping" on a map? When I was a kid, I thought this was meant to represent the Z axis (so until today)
33.
▲
by
ghurtado
4mo ago
Very "60s movie cartoon credits". I absolutely love it. (I guess saying "The Incredibles" would have been shorter, but it feels weird to credit them with this style)
34.
▲
by
ghurtado
4mo ago
The problem of 8yr olds watching too much YouTube is definitely not one for YouTube to fix. We're quickly getting to a point where all parenting is delegated to people and institutions that have nothing to do with raising children. And
35.
▲
by
ghurtado
4mo ago
The thing about humor is that you don't have to tell people when you don't get a joke, you can just quietly continue to live your life while you wait for your next chance to be temporarily happy.
36.
▲
by
ghurtado
4mo ago
Ironically appropriate
37.
▲
by
ghurtado
4mo ago
Give me Navigator or give me death
38.
▲
by
ghurtado
5mo ago
Nothing about programming forces anyone to do anything. That's never been a valid argument to dismiss criticism. It wasn't with Dreamweaver, any it wasn't with visual basic, and it isn't with Tailwind. Patterns matter. B
39.
▲
by
ghurtado
5mo ago
> can tailwind be used poorly? absolutely. but that's true of any tool Can tailwind be a useful CSS framework? Absolutely, but that can be said of any of them. Which is precisely why it makes sense to point out it's unique fl
40.
▲
by
ghurtado
6mo ago
> Is it actually the case that 5.5 is that much better Nobody was talking about how much better it is until you wrote this though It's like you're building your own windmills brick by brick
41.
▲
by
ghurtado
6mo ago
> basically no "specs" - just giving it coherent sane direction This is one variable I almost always see in this discussion: the more strict the rules that you give the LLM, the more likely it is to deeply disappoint you The ea
42.
▲
by
ghurtado
6mo ago
I can't really think of a less reliable test for anything at all than making a random guess as to something that had about 50/50 odds to begin with Easiest Turing test ever...
43.
▲
by
ghurtado
6mo ago
> Is that sharks are an ancient species For a shark lover, you should know that shark is not a species, but a taxonomy group. From there, everything else you assume is incorrect (ie: some species of sharks have definitely gone extinct)
44.
▲
by
ghurtado
6mo ago
What the hell does "fewer products" even mean?
45.
▲
by
ghurtado
6mo ago
Why do you present your second paragraph as if it were a reasonable solution to anything? It's a kindergartners view on troubleshooting an unfathomably complex issue. "Well just raise taxes and fix that!"
46.
▲
by
ghurtado
6mo ago
Nowadays the former seems to be a requirement for the latter, so I'm inclined to agree with you
47.
▲
by
ghurtado
6mo ago
It's not even just for writers either. If I was currently hiring, not using AI would be the cheapest, fastest way to impress me. I'm not kidding when I say that typos are not too far from becoming a sign of higher intelligence.
48.
▲
by
ghurtado
6mo ago
> Yes Sherlock I figured as much. I don't think it takes Sherlock Holmes to identify akshually types, but thanks for the compliment, I suppose.
49.
▲
by
ghurtado
6mo ago
"I fixed the stupidly complicated tabletop game with an even more complicated piece of software! Now you can be confused and not have to look at human faces while you furiously type away at the computer in order to prove to the DM th
50.
▲
by
ghurtado
6mo ago
I'm worse than you: the quotes are what drive me insane: > . “HP never exceeds max” I think it's because its such a braindead thing to fix that when I see them, it's clear the "author" hasn't even read their
51.
▲
by
ghurtado
6mo ago
The way things are headed, people with the ability to write on their own are going to be the hottest job in the 2030s.
52.
▲
by
ghurtado
6mo ago
Is this the first time you have heard of AI safety? Lots of articles you could read on the subject and answer your own question. (Unless your angle is: akshually, you can never make anything 100% safe )
53.
▲
by
ghurtado
6mo ago
Depends. Would it lead to increasing his wealth?
54.
▲
by
ghurtado
6mo ago
Trust that they already knew long before, and that this was the play all along. And if you don't believe that, do some digging into the lives of the psychopaths that started it.
55.
▲
by
ghurtado
6mo ago
I think you might be stretching the meaning of the term juuuuust a little bit. You're not far from claiming that farting in a crowded elevator is a chemical attack.
56.
▲
by
ghurtado
6mo ago
> Maybe the whole world is not in the U.S Not yet . Working on it, though.
57.
▲
by
ghurtado
6mo ago
Have you considered, however, how that event shaped your developing and impressionable subconscious and possibly influenced your future behavior as an adult?
58.
▲
by
ghurtado
6mo ago
> It’s written by Democratic Party partisans In a marvelous twist of irony, the commenter unwittingly and perfectly exemplified how easily it is to get people talking as if they were good little disciples of Goebbels. But don't wor
59.
▲
by
ghurtado
6mo ago
> The only developers I know who write Java It sounds like your personal anecdote is particularly uninformative then.
60.
▲
by
ghurtado
6mo ago
If we're taking suggestions, I'd like to propose "parsec" (not to be confused with the unit of distance of the same name) That way Han Solo can make sense in the infamous quote. EDIT: even Gemini gets this wrong: > In
More ›