Y
HN Search
Hacker News Search
new
|
comments
|
top
|
jobs
ghostberry
searching PlanetScale…
1.
▲
2.
▲
3.
▲
4.
▲
5.
▲
6.
▲
7 ms
·
31.
▲
by
ghostberry
12y ago
"What Happened To Finding The Best Person For The Job!?" It never existed. Study after study has shown the gender and race implied by your resume massively impacts the chance of you getting a callback.
32.
▲
by
ghostberry
12y ago
The pilots controls aren't directly connected to the flight surfaces any more, and haven't been for decades. So they're already going through software, which could go wrong. And if the aircraft detects something is wrong, it
33.
▲
by
ghostberry
12y ago
A fairly significant number of plane crashes are caused by humans doing something human. They don't have to do it on purpose to lead to disaster.
34.
▲
by
ghostberry
12y ago
Some of you seem to be worrying this would allow terrorists to crash a thousand aircraft at once. I don't think that's likely. Why would you even make this software accessible from the ground? On the plane, you replace the pilot w
35.
▲
by
ghostberry
12y ago
"Without such technology, war wouldn't be profitable. Without the profits, there would be no incentive to fight." This is without a doubt one of the most backwards ignorant things I have ever read online. It might come as a s
36.
▲
by
ghostberry
12y ago
"Mentally ill" is not an insult you throw at people you don't like. It's a medical term.
37.
▲
by
ghostberry
12y ago
Looking at the numbers, the mentally well have crashed many more aircraft on purpose than the mentally ill. So, how to protect against mentally well pilots?
38.
▲
by
ghostberry
12y ago
It's not a matter of if something is carcinogenic, but how carcinogenic, at what dose and under which circumstances. The article doesn't go into details about whether it'd be carcinogenic at the levels you can get in food.
39.
▲
by
ghostberry
12y ago
For attacking an enemy that doesn't have and real air defences they shouldn't be using a multirole jet fighter like the F-35 or a jet ground attack aircraft like the A-10. They're both way too expensive to run. They should be
40.
▲
by
ghostberry
12y ago
When the F-4 Phantom was developed, missiles were extremely unreliable, only around one in ten hit the target they were launched against, and they could only be launched in a fairly limited circumstances. Around 1975-1985, technology advanc