ggggtez

65 ms·

661.
by ggggtez 7y ago
The article suggests "surpisingly popular"==correct answers from experts. It could just as easily be crazy answers from crazy people.
662.
by ggggtez 7y ago
>conspiracy theories I can't say what such a poll would say, but I feel fairly confident that using any sort of "surprising popularity" measure is no guarantee of Truth, but only an excuse after the fact to explain a resul
663.
by ggggtez 7y ago
Does anyone know if there are binaries or even open source directories for the code on these machines? It's kind of lame that you'd likely need to buy one in order to tell if it's vulnerable to some type of attack, not to men
664.
by ggggtez 7y ago
This algorithm is relatively well known. If I read right, the author is just implementing an older algorithm but switching the order of two steps for efficiency reasons. No it never generates crossroads. Despite saying the maze can be imper
665.
by ggggtez 7y ago
People always have incentives to commit crimes. That's why police and prosecutors have to make good on threats to ensure their "best interests" line up with everyone else.
666.
by ggggtez 7y ago
I really like the idea of this as a scaffold for collecting lipids for the first cell membranes. It seems likely to me that there would need to be some relatively simple compound responsible. The fact this is present in meteorites gives me
667.
by ggggtez 7y ago
This is a sort of "gambit" that doesn't work because it assumes that all religion is created by humans. But most religions claim they are handed down directly from God, so the point would be moot. Of course anyone who thoug
668.
by ggggtez 7y ago
I think the point the previous poster is making is not just a need or desire for a vague answer (i.e. the universe was created and no one really knows so maybe it was God), but then actually going from that step to believe every word of a h
669.
by ggggtez 7y ago
Pure nonsense. Terror is not the same thing as economic sanctions. To suggest it's the same is to make language meaningless.
670.
by ggggtez 7y ago
>AMP isn't available on mobile firefox >it's Google's fault somehow Is this just begging for karma? There isn't even version or OS info. How is anyone going to actually discuss this other than just arguing blindly?
671.
by ggggtez 7y ago
If you share a google doc to public, it does the same thing. This is at best a case of user confusion, but is hardly insecure. Photos aren't even mutable, so having continued access after you see it once isn't relevant.
672.
by ggggtez 7y ago
No, having losing odds never stopped anyone from gambling.
673.
by ggggtez 7y ago
No, there is no raw images (unless this version changed). The github repo shows that the AI takes an Observe action, and it essentially gets data on every unit it can see in a machine friendly format. The previous version got info on every
674.
by ggggtez 7y ago
I'm pretty sure the AI can't see cloaked units, which is why it always built so many observers in the demo games.
675.
by ggggtez 7y ago
Very curious how this is going to turn out... This sounds like they are trying to train a bot to actually not be perfect? Otherwise I think they would say straight out: "You'll only have the option if you are grand-master".
676.
by ggggtez 7y ago
What is usually shown, time and time again, is that the voice assistants aren't secretly recording. They are triggered because they heard something that sounded like a hotword. Maybe you were talking about what dog you want you buy. So
677.
by ggggtez 7y ago
If you read the ruling, you'll not this is not just about reading the information, but the First Amendment (free speech). The government cannot prevent people from commenting and discussing the government's speech (through retwe
678.
by ggggtez 7y ago
So, you want Twitter to be both law enforcement, and the judicial system when determining if a government employee is breaking the law, and then preventing them from doing so? This is literally a case about federal law. Why would you hold T
679.
by ggggtez 7y ago
I get it that this is a joke, but more seriously I'd argue most labor is "region locked". Likely to within a few dozen miles of where you live. It's actually fairly difficult to just buy labor from another region witho
680.
by ggggtez 7y ago
>IMO it's both counterproductive and futile to keep national markets separated. So, developers in the USA should simply not sell their games overseas then? Let's say an indie game costs $10 in the states. In Thailand, the avera
681.
by ggggtez 7y ago
>it would actually make the poor poorer Nope. This is entirely wrong. Consider: You have $100. I have $1000. We both get +$50 worth of gold. So you have $150 and I have $1050. You increased your welth by 50%, but I only increased my weal
682.
by ggggtez 7y ago
>destroy the global economy Yeah, that wouldn't happen. Though maybe it would bring down the cost of certain scientific equipment. Countries like India would probably suffer since they "invest" heavily in gold.
683.
by ggggtez 7y ago
If I had to read a comment pointing out every misspelling on the internet, I just wouldn't use the internet at all. This type of comment adds very little value to other people.
684.
by ggggtez 7y ago
The problem is that innocent people could go to jail because they fall into that 81% of incorrect matches. The justice system, at least in the USA, has a presumption of innocence. The idea being that when there isn't enough evidence, i
685.
by ggggtez 7y ago
Put another way: they are saying that 81% of positive flags are actually false positives. Yikes. That might be better than random chance, but in the court of law that should hardly be considered evidence.
686.
by ggggtez 7y ago
Not sure what part you think is a false flag. Hong Kong has a history of protests against China. That would basically have been HK government admitting that Chinese law supersedes HK law. Could you imagine the UK passing a law that Brussels
687.
by ggggtez 7y ago
Agreed, the authors personal ability to make the phrases was not quite right. They also confuse the ability to have these attacked nouns, with the idea that they are equivalent to other sentences in meaning. I think it becomes clear things
688.
by ggggtez 7y ago
Consider also: Water commissioner. Is it sentient water that got a job? No it's obviously s normal person specializing in water.
689.
by ggggtez 7y ago
Because adjectives come before nouns. The first word is almost always is a descriptor of the second word. A "pig flier" is clearly something that flies pigs, not a type of pig that flies.
690.
by ggggtez 7y ago
>Would tying identity to online posts increase this trust? No. People happily reshare fake news all day under their real names. If you don't recall, Facebook also requires "Real Names" and we saw how much that helps. The d

More ›