geraneum

6 ms·

91.
by geraneum 3mo ago
Yup, my mistake.
92.
by geraneum 3mo ago
> deep understanding is going to become a commodity soon How does the text generated by LLM make “our” understanding deeper compared to text written in the books?
93.
by geraneum 3mo ago
> Claude has recognized some important semantics that we ourselves lack a good word for or at least under-appreciate. Ah, I love when Claude reads our collective minds and fills in the gaps to address the load-bearing seams genuinely wit
94.
by geraneum 3mo ago
> I don't need a vendor's special-sauce computer to build for consoles. This is ironic. Of course you do. You're already using it. You just happen to like the Microsoft's walled garden and not Apples. That's fine
95.
by geraneum 3mo ago
I don't disagree with you, but we're talking about affordability which is a different topic. > It's especially nice when you work on projects that aren't iOS/Apple native and you don't get Mac workstations.
96.
by geraneum 3mo ago
> Never fake success. Run builds, tests, linters, and relevant checks whenever possible. Don’t make mistakes. Don’t lie. Be successful. Be really successful, not the fake kind where you tell me you were successful when you actually faile
97.
by geraneum 3mo ago
People not having access to tech is bothersome, but nowadays Apple offers affordable machines compared to the same/worse specs from competitors. For example a MacBook Air with Apple Silicon and a moderate amount of memory.
98.
by geraneum 3mo ago
> What I have been missing in all this debate is substance. That’s strange because in this (and Andrew’s in lesser extent) post there’s plenty of substance on both technical, management and corporate influences like the difference of sty
99.
by geraneum 3mo ago
Do also frown upon people working in nursing homes? Or your uber driver? No one frowns upon the people who work/help people who need it.
100.
by geraneum 3mo ago
Hire not enslave! Like how you might hire a driver, or housemaid, or anyone to do a salaried or contract job? How does that perpetuates the problem?
101.
by geraneum 3mo ago
If they pay her what she’s owed and the damages. She can get her place, hire people and pay them to care of her or help her.
102.
by geraneum 3mo ago
Maybe in previous failed attempts that what the model landed on and they’re preemptively stopping it. Did they release the any info on the failed attempts?
103.
by geraneum 3mo ago
The article reads like a compilation of online chatter, social media post, etc. on AI. Not surprising to find unsubstantiated imaginary numbers there.
104.
by geraneum 3mo ago
In the farm?
105.
by geraneum 3mo ago
> It's just standard nerd drama. The elephant in the room are the trillion $ companies having a horse in this race.
106.
by geraneum 3mo ago
That sounds like a good idea but how do you know what you’re shipping?
107.
by geraneum 3mo ago
It's so sad that Rust vs Zig has been dragged into the AI psychosis vs anti AI narratives. I feel people are taking sides or picking and choosing now based on their allegiance and religious values. What good comes out of this?
108.
by geraneum 3mo ago
> non-deterministic problems I'm guessing you mean probabilistic? Nevertheless, you have an indeterministic variable here which is what the LLM generates.
109.
by geraneum 3mo ago
You have to put similar amount of resources when writing in Rust as well. With the difference that it’s more front loaded. Personally I’m a fan of Rust’s approach but the price for having bug free code has to be paid, regardless, one way or
110.
by geraneum 3mo ago
Not really. It seems like the Rust rewrite blog post triggered this. Which, even though I don’t agree with the tone, seems to be valid criticism.
111.
by geraneum 3mo ago
> and the project leaving isn't as good for Zig as Andrew is making it seem In this case, Bun was acquired by Anthropic. Leaving Zig is not necessarily out of merit. As much as they pretend it was.
112.
by geraneum 3mo ago
> gpt3->4o->sonnet4->opus4.6->fable While there are a lot of resources being poured into improving and integrating tooling and use cases and increasing model sizes, the leap between the models you notes are not as much as you
113.
by geraneum 3mo ago
> Cue some story here on a bank or airline somewhere still relying on cobol backend servers. There's existing money and expertise in those environments to rewrite the whole thing, yet they don't. You may loan them free engineer
114.
by geraneum 3mo ago
Well I was agreeing with you. Skimmed the paper as well.
115.
by geraneum 3mo ago
> A subset of python is python. Half a tomato is still tomato The funny thing about this is not that the first sentence is wrong, which it is. It’s the failed reductio ad absurdum.
116.
by geraneum 3mo ago
> I’d prefer a more direct claim in a paper This is not written to be just a paper. The target audience include media and online forums, and then maybe academia. Edit: typo
117.
by geraneum 3mo ago
>I don’t have access to my flavor of LLM on the train nor the time or budget to have it do the research and summary for me Aren't you gonna let the LLM develop for you anyway? Why bother writing and reading a post at all? > prete
118.
by geraneum 3mo ago
Not the original commenter; but, at least for me, the idea is that when it’s written by humans we know that effort and care were put into communicating the news. Otherwise they could post a link to the docs and we could ask my flavor of LLM
119.
by geraneum 3mo ago
> If the team (or agent swarm) isn't performing well it often isn't a problem with them. It's a problem with the new manager still trying to stay on top of everything and micromanaging all the things. You see problems in t
120.
by geraneum 3mo ago
You can have billions of valuation even without having any real product. It’s just make believe sometimes. Remember Nikola and Milton? There’s a solo founder for you. 30 freaking Bs.

More ›