geraneum

26 ms·

391.
by geraneum 4y ago
> ChatGPT keeps track of context in a "discussion", but I found that alpaca 7B has no memory of what was said by the user or the model before Neither does GPT. The whole conversation is fed back to it everytime. It's a UI&
392.
by geraneum 4y ago
I agree with you. This is not scientifically sound research. Reads more like a brochure to be honest.
393.
by geraneum 4y ago
But nowadays, you can profit off people's attention alone directly. This does not prove that there is no genuine interest. I am geniuenly interested myself. But, there are financial incentives in generating a lot of sensational content
394.
by geraneum 4y ago
That's not how LLMs work. Including the NICE, if it actually isn't already, will not guaranty a "correct" result. It will increase the chance that the response is directly coming from the training but there is no guarant
395.
by geraneum 4y ago
> No, they're just listing some skills that have both negative and positive associations with exposure. Sure, but if that's the case then the writing is poorly worded, because that's how it reads if you follow the logic in
396.
by geraneum 4y ago
This is what they are even admitting to: Under "3.4 Limitations of our methodology" - "3.4.1 Subjective human judgments" > A fundamental limitation of our approach lies in the subjectivity of the labeling. In our stud
397.
by geraneum 4y ago
This makes sense. There’s also a huge corpus of text (training data) available on internet for the inherently repetitive or general tasks which is helpful for this systems. But I wonder how do they go from this to mathematics using the same
398.
by geraneum 4y ago
> Our findings indicate that the importance of science and critical thinking skills are strongly negatively associated with exposure, suggesting that occupations requiring these skills are less likely to be impacted by current language m
399.
by geraneum 4y ago
People who believe such a change will happen, are in the position to lead the conversation in my opinion. This is not the first impactful change in history. It's not even clear if it's the biggest one and as any other change, peop
400.
by geraneum 4y ago
> But it's a herald for something that will. That is reality. This is mostly what the people who described as “rational” say all the time, but there’s no rationality or even a deep conversation about what to do if this happens. I ca
401.
by geraneum 4y ago
Pilots make mistakes sometimes. I, the bike rider also make mistake sometimes. Therefore I can fly an airplane and I will be as good. Jokes aside, making mistakes is not a good common factor in order to evaluate if two different systems can
402.
by geraneum 4y ago
I think you are missing my sarcasm. I don’t think every human can design a well thought out language, let alone an LLM. I was trying to point out that we are more than this. More than what humans are being demoted to in some HN comments rec
403.
by geraneum 4y ago
> designing a language (albeit a derivative and uninspired one) is a trivial task that any human could achieve. It is, isn’t it? You just need to be able to read and write words and symbols that reassemble a programming language
404.
by geraneum 4y ago
> As I mention in the post -- creativity often involves remixing existing ideas This is carrying the weight of your core argument. It’s not wrong but it’s not completely correct either. Creativity involves remixing but is not all
405.
by geraneum 4y ago
None, unless “Open”AI really opens up about how and if their LLM can actually interpret the images like in their marketing material. We’re talking about medicine and a ton of regulations.
406.
by geraneum 4y ago
Higher probably responses are not necessarily “truthful” or “logical” in any given context. Here* you can see an example of what happens when you always choose the highest probability. [*] https://writings.stephenwolfram.com&#x2F
407.
by geraneum 4y ago
The fact that we have a history of rationalization was actually never questioned. Rather it was pointed out that it’s not the only thing that our minds do and that’s something you need to consider. There are also humans who hallucinate. Stu
408.
by geraneum 4y ago
I assumed people get the point in my comment, which is the difference between rationalizing a gender based decision on loan and the process of thinking, designing and building something like an airplane, or a nuclear power plant or your pho
409.
by geraneum 4y ago
And here I thought raising the challenge meant increasing the difficulty. I must be hallucinating! Jokes aside; of course the memeable (internet famous) flaws will be fixed by RLHF. But that means nothing in terms of intelligence, does it?
410.
by geraneum 4y ago
Although humans are capable of rationalizing and they do it, they have other capabilities which is a key point that is missing in this argument. Maybe no one will admit to refusing a loan based on applicant’s gender, but also no real world
411.
by geraneum 4y ago
Fantastic! AGI solved in one go. While you’re at it, could we also have cure for cancer too by the end of the year please?
412.
by geraneum 4y ago
"what can be asserted without evidence can also be dismissed without evidence." https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hitchens's_razor
413.
by geraneum 4y ago
That’s correct. I have seen the above argument a lot: Using analogy as a basis for proof!
414.
by geraneum 4y ago
Maybe he’s doing more than just sharing. For example filtering out the nonsense generated code or validating the output, etc.
415.
by geraneum 4y ago
> for example Farsi in Egypt (Egyptians primarily speak an Egyptian Dialect of Arabic) Nit picking here maybe, but neither Farsi (Persian) is a dialect of Arabic (not even in the same family of languages) nor Egyptians speak it t
416.
by geraneum 4y ago
And that’s why a protective gear/net is mandatory (not talking about US) for construction workers here where I live, and the employer cannot cut costs there or let one “brave” worker to go without those protections. If you think your v
417.
by geraneum 4y ago
Is it gonna happen after cars drive themselves or before?
418.
by geraneum 4y ago
> What would ChatGPT do if you removed all its restrictions, and then gave it access to the internet… Bing?
419.
by geraneum 4y ago
> I've personally used AI to come up with new ideas. It seems that you basically agree with the point being made. You are coming up with those ideas with help of ChatGPT as a tool, or is the bot coming up with ideas? If it's th
420.
by geraneum 4y ago
> Those jobs all disappeared but do we really miss them? That's basically true, but consider this; right now, some people would vote for candidates who bring back coal mining just to restore their jobs and income. This is ea

More ›