Y
HN Search
Hacker News Search
new
|
comments
|
top
|
jobs
geoffroberts
searching PlanetScale…
1.
▲
2.
▲
3.
▲
4.
▲
5.
▲
6.
▲
7 ms
·
31.
▲
The Unspoken Hard Bits of Bootstrapping a SaaS Product to Life
(outseta.com)
113 points
by
geoffroberts
6y ago
|
26 comments
32.
▲
Why Coinbase Got It Wrong and Tech Leaders Need to Speak Out
(outseta.com)
4 points
by
geoffroberts
6y ago
|
0 comments
33.
▲
My macro-level observations after 10 years spent building tech startups
(outseta.com)
3 points
by
geoffroberts
6y ago
|
0 comments
34.
▲
by
geoffroberts
7y ago
I understand your point—it's not about optimizing your process above all else (at the expense of speed, for example). But you can and should optimize your hiring process just like you would your sales process, onboarding process, etc a
35.
▲
by
geoffroberts
7y ago
These are the foundational aspects of our hiring process that we openly advocate for. https://www.qualified.io/blog/posts/the-qualified-manifesto-...
36.
▲
by
geoffroberts
7y ago
What we advocate for is making the technical assessment component relatively quick and painless, but using the work sample as a basis for assessing the other sorts of skills and intangibles that you mentioned. You can use your in-person tim
37.
▲
by
geoffroberts
7y ago
No argument there!
38.
▲
by
geoffroberts
7y ago
Why would it not be?
39.
▲
by
geoffroberts
7y ago
The purpose of this paper is to present research that's completely independent of any product, and show how the concepts apply to software engineering specifically. What's your source in saying "software engineering has one o
40.
▲
by
geoffroberts
7y ago
Great points—I completely agree that the human element of hiring is of critical importance when it comes to building effective and high functioning teams. This article is intended to focus on the more technical/job focused component of
41.
▲
by
geoffroberts
7y ago
Agreed. Ambition is an intangible that should also be assessed during the hiring process.
42.
▲
by
geoffroberts
7y ago
I don't think that true—what the article is saying is that different hiring activities are more or less useful in predicting the future success of a hire. And the more measures you employee intelligently, the more predictive the proces
43.
▲
by
geoffroberts
7y ago
That's true.... that might not be a company you want to work for. If there's not clear strategic direction and things constantly shift, it's very hard to hire anybody effectively into the org.
44.
▲
by
geoffroberts
7y ago
So you need to design you assessment process to reflect the real world scenarios the hire will encounter. It's surprising to me to hear so many developers push back on this notion that you can't design a predictive hiring process.
45.
▲
by
geoffroberts
7y ago
Love your site—thanks for sharing! And +1 with regards to the potential legal issues.
46.
▲
by
geoffroberts
7y ago
I love this point—the more time you can spend selling the candidate the better. And I think the more effective your interview process, candidates take notice and probably need to be "sold" that much less.
47.
▲
by
geoffroberts
7y ago
Agreed that interviews are both a gatekeeping and social ritual, but from the perspective of the employer I do think "the point of a job interview" should very clearly be to identify candidates with the highest probability of bein
48.
▲
by
geoffroberts
7y ago
I completely agree that if you're designing an sort of assessment process, you should go through it yourself or ask other engineers to go through it so it's reasonably scoped in terms of expected time commitment. You can also use
49.
▲
by
geoffroberts
7y ago
Yes, but not generic tests—in order to design a hiring process that's actually predictive of future job performance, the "tests" have to be designed to be directly relevant to the real world work that the engineer will be tas
50.
▲
by
geoffroberts
7y ago
Actually, yes! Erik Bernhardsson, the CTO at Better.com who is cited in the article a few times, does exactly that for finalist candidates that they ask to provide a significant work sample. I think that's 100% appropriate. But that sa
51.
▲
Making software engineering interviews predictive of job performance
(qualified.io)
131 points
by
geoffroberts
7y ago
|
109 comments
52.
▲
The Science Behind Making Engineering Interviews Truly Predictive of Performance
(qualified.io)
2 points
by
geoffroberts
7y ago
|
0 comments
53.
▲
The Science Behind Making Developer Interviews Truly Predictive of Performance
(qualified.io)
5 points
by
geoffroberts
7y ago
|
0 comments
54.
▲
by
geoffroberts
7y ago
Buildium stayed pretty true to their original market, focusing mostly on serving that market with a greater level of depth through additional products and services. RealPage, the acquirer, sells to a number of adjacent markets and is moving
55.
▲
by
geoffroberts
7y ago
I'm definitely in agreement that having some fundamental understanding of other areas of the business is a good thing, for everyone. The point I'm making is you need to be congnizant of where you spend your time and what new skill
56.
▲
by
geoffroberts
7y ago
Thank you so much for the kind words! Buildium found a good market opportunity and built solid technology, but culture and how the business was run was definitely part of its special sauce and a major contributing factor to this sort of out
57.
▲
by
geoffroberts
7y ago
Correct.
58.
▲
by
geoffroberts
7y ago
You got it!
59.
▲
by
geoffroberts
7y ago
So Buildium makes money off of normal subscription payments like any SaaS business does by charging a monthly fee to property management companies for access to their software. They also make money by taking a small percentage of rent payme
60.
▲
by
geoffroberts
7y ago
Great points—I 100% agree. While at Buildium I actually built our three marketing teams—acquisition marketing, product marketing, and corporate marketing to support many of the different functions you mentioned.
More ›