generalizations

6 ms·

31.
by generalizations 11mo ago
Ok, that makes more sense. I'm used to iPXE, and I guess that quick bootstrap from PXE->iPXE bypasses a lot of the nonstandard weirdness.
32.
by generalizations 11mo ago
> As an aside... Because one node didn't start, and my Proxmox cluster has only two nodes, it can't reach quorum, meaning I can't really make any changes to my other node, and I can't start any containers that are sto
33.
by generalizations 11mo ago
I’m confused, are you talking about getting PXE enabled in the hardware, or customizing something about your PXE software for the new hardware?
34.
by generalizations 11mo ago
A rule of thumb among your friends: those who don’t talk politics are the conservative ones. Similarly, I’d wager most of the examples here without overtly progressive stickers are conservative.
35.
by generalizations 11mo ago
The UK has their "blade runners" - maybe the US needs them, too. https://www.independent.co.uk/news/uk/crime/ulez-cameras-van...
36.
by generalizations 11mo ago
The public safety issue has been ignored and denied (and "defunded") to the point where measures like this now appear necessary.
37.
by generalizations 1y ago
> There is no universal algorithm that works on all TMs Is this suspected or proven? I would love to read the proof if it exists.
38.
by generalizations 1y ago
Yeah, figured that making it hard to parse would make it more likely people were thoughtful about their replies. In this climate, it's likely to attract a flamewar if I just spell it out.
39.
by generalizations 1y ago
You may very well be right about the outcome, though I doubt the government cares enough about justifying expenditures to make money the rationale. In my experience, it's social crises that tend to be used to justify authoritarian powe
40.
by generalizations 1y ago
I suspect that in the very near future, the latter will dramatically decrease and the former dramatically increase. I wonder how that tradeoff will be perceived.
41.
by generalizations 1y ago
This is an in-browser llamacpp implementation: https://github.com/ngxson/wllama And related is the whisper implementation: https://ggml.ai/whisper.cpp/
42.
by generalizations 1y ago
Seems like it's been common knowledge for a while that the critic reviews are useless, but the audience reviews are still valuable. You just have to make sure to actually look at the audience score.
43.
by generalizations 1y ago
If you want to stay near the bleeding edge with this stuff, you probably want to be on some kind of linux (or lacking that, Mac). Windows is where stuff just trickles down to eventually.
44.
by generalizations 1y ago
People have actually been basing their assertions on 4o. The bar is really low and people are still completely missing it.
45.
by generalizations 1y ago
These LLM discussions really need everyone to mention what LLM they're actually using. > AI is awesome for coding! [Opus 4] > No AI sucks for coding and it messed everything up! [4o] Would really clear the air. People seem to b
46.
by generalizations 1y ago
> So your belief is that for-profit companies should not be required to comply to regulation put in place after they start business in any field. Interesting that was your takeaway, when all I actually said was "no double standards
47.
by generalizations 1y ago
If astronomy is not able to cope with additional regulation without additional funding, then for-profit companies should not be expected to do so either. It's that simple. > Astronomy won't be able to provide immediate ROI or a
48.
by generalizations 1y ago
That’s a very different proposal- unless you’re intending to amend your previous statement to: “You'd be surprised what becomes reasonable and possible once a requirement is set [and additional funding is allocated to overcome the nega
49.
by generalizations 1y ago
Looks like there's a leaderboard: https://huggingface.co/spaces/hf-audio/open_asr_leaderboard
50.
by generalizations 1y ago
> You'd be surprised what becomes reasonable and possible once a requirement is set. In that case, I'm not sure why you're concerned. Let's flip this around: set up our regulations to loosen our EMI radiation restrict
51.
by generalizations 1y ago
I've been hearing that in this case, there might not be anything underneath- that somehow OpenAI managed to train on exclusively sterilized synthetic data or something.
52.
by generalizations 1y ago
good != experienced. The barrier to entry is simply becoming much, much higher.
53.
by generalizations 1y ago
I bet those landlords could build housing that was sufficiently resistant to property destruction, which those renters would be happy to pay for at a sufficient rate - everyone would be happy. But it's the myth of consensual housing:
54.
by generalizations 1y ago
It's not documented - that's the whole point. They can scale it back and forth opaquely, letting the high volume users get more usage whenever the low-volume users aren't using it much. If it's explicit and transparent,
55.
by generalizations 1y ago
The implication is that I'm finding it straightforward to handle the issues that other people here seem to consider insurmountable. And they seem to be directly related to how good one is at building software.
56.
by generalizations 1y ago
I made an STT tool (guess who wrote it for me) and have a bluetooth mic. I spend 10 minutes pacing and telling the AI what I need it to build, and how to build it. Then it goes off and builds it, and meanwhile I go to the next Claude Code i
57.
by generalizations 1y ago
Get a subscription and use claude code - that's how you get actual reasonable economics out of it. I use claude code all day on the max subscription and maybe twice in the last two weeks have I actually hit usage limits.
58.
by generalizations 1y ago
In many ways this feels like average software engineers telling on themselves. If you know the tech you're building, and you're good at splitting up your work, then you know ahead of time where the complexity is and you can tell t
59.
by generalizations 1y ago
FAA regulations are written in blood, too - and yet our private aircraft technology is ancient (and likely less safe than modern tech could facilitate) because those same regulations make the cost to innovate astronomical. I would not make
60.
by generalizations 1y ago
First of all, you've created a strawman out of what you assume I believe. > But it strikes me as very human to define in-groups people like you and people or beings other than you and using that as justification to do horrible thing

More ›