gefhfffh

8 ms·

31.
by gefhfffh 5y ago
Nope, smart states do that. Heat can be stored. Heat when it's cheap.
32.
by gefhfffh 5y ago
Like storage systems, yeah. Bitcoin only makes it worse, because it uses/wastes energy of which we don't have enough clean one
33.
by gefhfffh 5y ago
So does mining. Just turn off fossil based plants and you reduce needed max capacity. Didn't know we have too much energy with a low carbon footprint.
34.
by gefhfffh 5y ago
We can use storage systems to smooth out supply/demand of electricity. Mining is unsufficient, because it can't provide energy in the night when the sun is not shining. Storage systems can
35.
by gefhfffh 5y ago
E.g. energy storage systems
36.
EDF again lowers its nuclear production forecast(thetimeshub.in)
1 points by gefhfffh 5y ago|0 comments
37.
by gefhfffh 5y ago
So PGP and the encryption protocol of Threema aren't proper encryption protocols? Then, how do you break the key? Brute force? If you break one key that way, it's likely you could break equally secure keys as well. Access to the d
38.
by gefhfffh 5y ago
Thanks for the link. Actually, didn't even know that WhatsApp changed their backup mechanism, which previously used a mechanism that allowed e.g. google to obtain the messages. Overall, the concept seems to be the same: use a secret, o
39.
by gefhfffh 5y ago
While I can't make Element copy Discords UX (not sure I'd even want that), I can show you a young client that seems to do that: https://cinny.in/
40.
by gefhfffh 5y ago
Element does not fetch any message from their servers in general. If you use a server hosted by Element and don't disable encryption, e2ee encrypted messages will be fetched from their servers. What is "it" that in your opini
41.
by gefhfffh 5y ago
I have nowhere called them end-to-end encrypted Backups, that's a straw man. > Regarding the security theater, the backups encrypted with your password are far more vulnerable to being compromised than any of the popular e2e encrypt
42.
by gefhfffh 5y ago
How is that? Only you as a recipient can decrypt the messages, because they are sent e2ee to you. And this stays true if you use the backup, as only you know that password.
43.
by gefhfffh 5y ago
It backups your keys encrypted with a password only you know at server side (opt in) When you login, you provide that password, and Element can use that to decrypt the keys and use these to decrypt the messages stored in the cloud Alternati
44.
by gefhfffh 5y ago
> If you only need the one channel and you need to manage a 100+ people, Telegram is by far the best tool. Even better than Element? In my experience it does well with hundreds of people as well. And it allows to group channels as well,
45.
by gefhfffh 5y ago
This is wrong, see Element/Matrix, which practically does that
46.
by gefhfffh 5y ago
Checkout Element, it covers all that as well. However, the Desktop App is Electron, so I don't know if you are OK with that
47.
by gefhfffh 5y ago
TBH I would consider Matrix the way to go regarding chat. It allows app and vendor independent communication and combines e2ee with Synchronisation across arbitrary many devices (something that many people like from Telegram). These days, T
48.
by gefhfffh 5y ago
Not if you run them yourself
49.
by gefhfffh 5y ago
You could bridge Signal with Matrix and then use two Matrix clients. Quite a workaround, but should work ;-)
50.
by gefhfffh 5y ago
Pretty sure there exists more than one source of gas. You only need as much gas as is required to fill the gap that alternative gas providers and heat pumps can't provide to compensate the lost gas. Another option is to improve the hou
51.
by gefhfffh 5y ago
Buying somewhere else, using alternatives, such as green gas or heat pumps ...and then never go back
52.
by gefhfffh 5y ago
Totally wasted "carbon" budget ...
53.
by gefhfffh 5y ago
No, not all their code is open source; they're claiming it is for spam protection
54.
by gefhfffh 5y ago
Imo WhatsApp also should have been interoperable and without phone number obligation. WhatsApp basically killed interoperable chat by jumping on phones and building a near-monopoly.
55.
by gefhfffh 5y ago
Unusable is a big stretch
56.
by gefhfffh 5y ago
It's not complete, they made a blog post recently where they stated that they have closed source code in use. I think it was about spam
57.
by gefhfffh 5y ago
What is exactly what I am trying to say, since the comment up the chain states that e.g. interoperability isnt a requirement of most users
58.
by gefhfffh 5y ago
Didn't know leaking meta data was a requirement for most of the people ;-)
59.
by gefhfffh 5y ago
"One in four people struggle to keep up with friends because they are using too many apps" https://www.dailymail.co.uk/sciencetech/article-10451559/One... TLDR: people are just not aware of their require
60.
by gefhfffh 5y ago
Unfortunately, you can't simply choose. Messaging apps that don't interoperate inherently create forces to use their app if you have contacts you want to reach on that app

More ›