gedy

751 ms·

3061.
by gedy 11y ago
I've wondered the same, as I really like Ractive. Briefly what I found is: Vue seems using "magic mode" vs the Ractive.get/Ractive.set. Ractive uses virtual DOM, Vue does not.
3062.
by gedy 11y ago
If we legalize hard drugs, we should also legalize local communities being able to running people out of towns and neighborhoods - drug abusers are a blight on communities.
3063.
by gedy 11y ago
Maybe our best and brightest would be just better off raising and schooling their own kids vs relying on iffy and/or expensive options.
3064.
by gedy 11y ago
It was gigantically SLOW from my perspective - was excited when it came out, then noticed it was a magnitude slower for some things.
3065.
by gedy 11y ago
Yes true, and to be clear, I think React is fine on it's own. It's just that from my view it's not fundamentally so superior as to warrant rewriting a decently structured app written in one of the other JS frameworks from th
3066.
by gedy 11y ago
Maybe it's just my peers :-) but this highlights to me why I've been reluctant to adopt React. I keep getting eye rolls about not using it - but everyone I encounter seems to in the process of still figuring out application and a
3067.
by gedy 11y ago
You are supposed to use the Apple app, not that old web stuff.
3068.
by gedy 11y ago
It's backwards compatible and works fine from what I see
3069.
by gedy 11y ago
Thing is - their current model was sort of a dumb semi-forced yearly upgrade anyways. "Oh WebStorm 8 is out already, didn't we just buy 7?" etc.
3070.
by gedy 11y ago
FYI for the curious: It does work with my older Moto 360 and iPhone, but some caveats: - It seems to need the iOS app running all the time, otherwise get a constant, undismissable "Touch to reconnect" on Watch, unlike on Android.
3071.
by gedy 11y ago
> React is only the V (arguably a bit of C) Yes, but beef I have with the cool kids I've worked with are they throw out the entire app: MVC, Server, etc. so they can use this magical V - then completely rewrite and wing the rest of
3072.
by gedy 11y ago
I'm thinking that's a framework-specific or coding-style issue? From using a number of frameworks, I've virtually never had issues with endless loops. Perhaps it helps that frameworks like Knockout, etc don't trigger c
3073.
by gedy 11y ago
Thanks. Yeah 1-way as default is reasonable. I suppose in my case I haven't seen performance issues due to data size, and also have taken to using RactiveJS which allows both 1-way and 2-way via [[someProp]] and {{someProp}}, respecti
3074.
by gedy 11y ago
I see 2-way data-binding is mentioned here and will still be supported (good). Curious why has 2-way now become 'uncool' recently, e.g. React? 2-way is what got me excited about client side JS due to the code reduction in an av
3075.
by gedy 11y ago
My group policy cost more (~60%) working at a corporation than my paying for it on my own - because they are averaging costs for everyone.
3076.
by gedy 11y ago
Knockout on it's own is just data-binding, we ended up using this as the SPA framework around Knockout: http://durandaljs.com/