gcp

45 ms·

511.
by gcp 10y ago
I think that's really a side effect of it being free. (And I wonder if VSCode will eat that ecosystem...) Do you have examples where the Atom/VSCode package is much better maintained than the ST3 one?
512.
by gcp 10y ago
Hell, the Sublime dude even wrote a custom Regex engine just for highly performant searching. Presumably everything Electron based is using Irregexp under the hood, so I doubt that's a real competitive advantage. The performance diff
513.
by gcp 10y ago
1) Arguable. In any case Chrome and everything based on it (i.e. Electron) render fonts too light compared to native apps on Windows, and don't properly respect ClearType settings. I've been told the underlying issue is a design m
514.
by gcp 10y ago
I don't really mind the static overhead as long as it stays fast and if it could deal with 'larger than memory' files sensibly. Alas, it does neither. I'm very hesitant to standardize on a non-OSS editor, though, so I th
515.
by gcp 10y ago
My flaws: 1) Uses Chrome's font renderer - it looks terrible on Windows 2) Indent = Tab size 3) Themes can't properly customize some key on-screen assets 4) No macro recording/playback 5) Can't edit enormous files Other
516.
by gcp 10y ago
Visual Studio Code?
517.
by gcp 10y ago
As you as complaints are balanced by positive feedback about what works, never feel bad to complain.
518.
by gcp 10y ago
Hmm, looks interesting. I use KDE on Kubuntu 16.04, but have been annoyed by some memory leaks in Plasma that eventually cause Plasmashell to lock up at 100% CPU in the Qt GC system. I tried upgrading via the ppa backports but the updated P
519.
by gcp 10y ago
20+ browser tabs at any given time Are you browsing with Chrome?
520.
by gcp 10y ago
"It's probably worth reading through https://github.com/w3c/resource-timing/issues/64 and the proposal I linked above. In short, it's not clear that implementing the Origin header the way Chrom
521.
by gcp 10y ago
Oh thanks, I actually misread that part!
522.
by gcp 10y ago
https://twitter.com/zeynep/status/822301430933573632 The responses here are telling. The reasoning of a lot of people seems to be "WhatsApp isn't perfect, we should tell people not to use WhatsApp"
523.
by gcp 10y ago
https://blog.jessfraz.com/ seems to suggest she did not, in fact, quit the industry. (Good, it would only make the problem worse, no?)
524.
by gcp 10y ago
Better hope the Chinese don't take over our economy any time soon, I'm sure their devs have the same view on this.
525.
by gcp 10y ago
Or just having it as an optional language setting.
526.
by gcp 10y ago
IMHO, this whole idea of "you live in $COUNTRY so you only get to communicate in $MAIN_LANGUAGE_OF_COUNTRY" doesn't belong on the internet. As a Belgian, I can assure you the majority of the internet does not even get that
527.
by gcp 10y ago
The opposite of "original content" isn't "old content". It's non-Netflix content.
528.
by gcp 10y ago
Netflix is great when you have kids. Uninterrupted cartoons with no commercials where you can pick suitable shows for any age group, properly translated, always available. Their original series there don't seem to score too highly yet
529.
by gcp 10y ago
Looks similar to http://stateofjs.com/
530.
by gcp 10y ago
Don't they want to live in London because it's a nice city where their employment opportunities are? If the latter moves, well, Paris is pretty nice too.
531.
by gcp 10y ago
Modifying the message mostly really shouldn't be necessary. unsubscribe
532.
by gcp 10y ago
File a bug? Maybe there's an extension for it, too. AFAIK almost every mailing list has to deal with the DMARC problem by rewriting From.
533.
by gcp 10y ago
So what did LKML end up doing? Edit: given the Ts'o response above I guess they enforce the sender to not have DMARC. "There are people with google.com addresses that need to use non-Google addresses in order to participate on the
534.
by gcp 10y ago
Which email client is that? Presumably, this could be fixed (well, worked around) there.
535.
by gcp 10y ago
Because they went extinct, duh! Wait a minute...
536.
by gcp 10y ago
This is definitely a demographic. The browsers are both good enough products for many common user cases that something like this can dominate the consideration.
537.
by gcp 10y ago
the way it was rolled out and abandoned after a few years didn't feel especially strategic This doesn't "feel" like a very well substantiated argument either. It received little traction, users didn't like the per
538.
by gcp 10y ago
I know lots of people doing interesting things at Mozilla and I have no idea why they get such a bad rap The other movers in this space are for-profit corporations. Nobody's expecting anything of them. The resulting dread leads to un
539.
by gcp 10y ago
Isn't closing down projects (that don't seem to be succeeding and are taking resources) exactly evidence of focus? Eich wasn't fired. He quit because he felt Mozilla was put under too much pressure because of him. Ironic you
540.
by gcp 10y ago
The "skeptical" angle fits the organization (and some part of its users) well, IMHO.

More ›