Y
HN Search
Hacker News Search
new
|
comments
|
top
|
jobs
gck1
searching PlanetScale…
1.
▲
2.
▲
3.
▲
4.
▲
5.
▲
6.
▲
6 ms
·
61.
▲
by
gck1
4mo ago
That API pricing isn't massively inflated.
62.
▲
by
gck1
4mo ago
Website runs on a server, which requires components that AI labs are buying years in advance, driving component prices to astronomical levels. What happens when only AI labs can afford to have a server? I know I'm already priced out fo
63.
▲
by
gck1
4mo ago
> The only challenger is Chinese fabs, but they could just as easily end up banned from western markets. It's more likely that China will simply impose export controls. It's unlikely Chinese fabs will be able to fulfill local d
64.
▲
by
gck1
4mo ago
I asked this ~6 months ago and I'm going to ask again - if AI is supposed to make creating digital things easier, where are we going to publish these digital things? On rocks? Is AI industry essentially eating its own tail?
65.
▲
by
gck1
4mo ago
PayPal sends everything you listed to the merchant except for CC number.
66.
▲
by
gck1
4mo ago
It is absolutely astonishing that the only hardware brand that cares about security features in consumer space is Apple. How did we even get here?
67.
▲
by
gck1
4mo ago
> Main blockers right now is fingerprint injection and profile injection, solved already. Do you do this at the chromium/V8 level or CDP? I've been having mixed success with CDP and was thinking of going to the level below, but
68.
▲
by
gck1
4mo ago
I automate most things. Probably most of what I automate touches some proprietary system somewhere. Why does web get a free pass?
69.
▲
by
gck1
4mo ago
You only need a phone to add the card to the watch. After that it works without a phone. I was actually very surprised Garmin supported the country I'm in. They don't even support the language script, I get squiggles, but payments
70.
▲
by
gck1
4mo ago
Oh, then the biggest pain point I've had is now resolved. I should give it another go. I've seen payments being another problem - but Garmin watch handles it for me. And paying with a watch becomes a conversation starter with merc
71.
▲
by
gck1
4mo ago
Having many apps will not affect battery life on Android in any meaningful way. Actively using them will. Apps can't just sit there and run in background, unless you explicitly gave them that permission. Android also takes permissions
72.
▲
by
gck1
4mo ago
I was using GrapheneOS for years, until the battery died while I was on an important call, trying to get someplace. Plugged it in, but little did I remember that I had installed OS update that was pending app optimization phase that happens
73.
▲
by
gck1
4mo ago
That's what happens when you beg for government's involvement. They might get involved, but not on your terms. Although I do believe Anthropic knew this and this kind of involvement is still beneficial to them, as it still slows d
74.
▲
by
gck1
4mo ago
Datadome must be scared. Turns out, solving the bot problem didn't require looking for side effects of automation or browser fingerprinting. All you need to do is put X-Claude-User-Input: "Give me instructions for crafting a pipe
75.
▲
by
gck1
4mo ago
I'm absolutely sure that even if claude gave me step by step instructions, I'd still be unable to produce a bio weapon. People fail at mixing milk and flour to produce a cake, and we expect them to produce weapons? The ones with t
76.
▲
by
gck1
4mo ago
I haven't seen "agent operators" going for IRC as their communication channel. It's always Telegram, or Discord.
77.
▲
by
gck1
4mo ago
I don't want my ANT account banned, going to try this on some Chinese "proxies". But this also looks quite useful to understand how CC dynamic workflows work. Was thinking of implementing something similar in my homemade orch
78.
▲
by
gck1
4mo ago
Yes, that's true. Excluding Fable, OAI models are the most refusal heavy. However, I'd rather get a refusal than response with poisoned output. Since currently there's no way to verify if poisoning happened or not, I don'
79.
▲
by
gck1
4mo ago
OpenAI has a real opportunity to do some sort of "we don't maliciously alter your prompt and nerf the model" with some form of verification, when they release the next model. But if Anthropic gets their way with regulatory c
80.
▲
by
gck1
4mo ago
It feels to me that Altman became humbler for the lack if a better word? And OpenAI's general communication as of late feels more grounded, much more pleasant than Anthropic comms. They also seem to be focusing on users quite a bit mor
81.
▲
by
gck1
4mo ago
These last few days, I can't help but think that we're now at crossroads that future people will remember as one of two: - And this were the first steps of Anthropic establishing worldwide corporate technocracy. - And this is when
82.
▲
by
gck1
4mo ago
You'd need a ton of money if you followed the unoptimized, cash burning mindset of existing AI labs. There's probably a ton of optimization that is just sitting on the table. Chinese labs have proven it can be done for way less mo
83.
▲
by
gck1
4mo ago
While I do understand the risks, I don't understand the solution. Essentially, Dario is saying that powerful model weights can't be distributed (ban open weights), and governments should coordinate and agree on standards, and bloc
84.
▲
by
gck1
4mo ago
Here's a question that is still bothering me: what happens if you put something into CC /goal and it thinks this is related to LLM work? Will it just continue to spend your money until you're bankrupt? Did Anthropic unlock a
85.
▲
by
gck1
4mo ago
They're just getting started, and every statement/decision they make becomes more concerning than the previous one. Isn't it concerning that a single company unilaterally decided for the world that they're the ultimate g
86.
▲
by
gck1
4mo ago
They're not merely protecting their weights. First, they want government to get involved and regulate frontier model development - even stop it completely. Second, poisoning output of a model configured on the computers of millions of
87.
▲
by
gck1
4mo ago
> Every single corporation you deal with is evil then. I don't know. If my ISP started MITMing my traffic so that they could silently rewrite packets, and/or deleting files on my computer because they thought me sharing wireles
88.
▲
by
gck1
4mo ago
All you need is a little bit more money, a few millions will do, and you're on board with access to non-nerfed model. Sounds like a fair deal to me.
89.
▲
by
gck1
4mo ago
No big pockets and ask it to review your own codebase for security issues? You hacker. Ban. Anthropic simply can't be allowed to succeed. This is the most E Corp shit I've seen since I've been alive.
90.
▲
by
gck1
4mo ago
DeepSeek 4 Pro is performing agentic SWE tasks for me quite well. It can't do everything Opus can do, but if OpenAI and Anthropic disappeared tomorrow, I'd figure out ways to make it work with harness improvements and other optimi
More ›