Y
HN Search
Hacker News Search
new
|
comments
|
top
|
jobs
gcb0
searching PlanetScale…
1.
▲
2.
▲
3.
▲
4.
▲
5.
▲
6.
▲
32 ms
·
241.
▲
by
gcb0
8y ago
your landlord will get the notification about carbon monoxide on their phone. Then they will call you. It might be a false alarm twice. Then it might be real the third time but then they decided to not call you and just silence it. lot'
242.
▲
by
gcb0
8y ago
the age when developers have absolutely no clue what convenience scripts are doing! this is comedy gold.
243.
▲
by
gcb0
8y ago
so much bullshit to force new abusive legislation. at least they avoided "think of the children"itis nothing on this topic is new. laws for wire fraud and money laundry already lay a foundation for prosecuting international crimes
244.
▲
by
gcb0
8y ago
projecting much? :) I personally agree with the point being afraid of incompetence, not malice.
245.
▲
by
gcb0
8y ago
most people on FB never signed up for it. they have my phone number and social graph because my acquaintances let the app upload their contact list, and same for photos. also, can you say that facebook, advertising and thinktanks are not p
246.
▲
by
gcb0
8y ago
likle anyone walks on a sidewalk in california! facebook have everyone around you uploading photos. google and amazon have microphones in your house and houses you visit. considering the social settings on both countries it is the same cove
247.
▲
by
gcb0
8y ago
I grew up referencing RFCs in network software land. Then I got a few gigs with eletronics and the first years were the most depressive of my life. every step started with a research for some standard, then the request to purchase it, then
248.
▲
by
gcb0
8y ago
hire better* people to add to the mix. the problem will eventually solve itself. you can't force knowledge hoarders to change. learned that the hard way. * better as in who like to share knowledge
249.
▲
by
gcb0
8y ago
can't read an article behind a paypal. but how is this facial data collection any different than Facebook's?
250.
▲
by
gcb0
8y ago
I guess you missed the point. in most societies, specially western, death is never a concern unless you are terminally ill. which is insane. I read the comment you are replying to as a joke of the article title. As in, how can something be
251.
▲
by
gcb0
8y ago
because by killing pensions and forcing people to gamble with stock are essentially also "paying for someone else's retirement" only that its Buffet's and the likes instead of people that needs it for a sane functioning
252.
▲
by
gcb0
8y ago
> If you build it, they will come. People already built it. And not even talking about old gopher. Adblockers are that now. People who are technical enough see the benefit and swear by it. We just need to make it easier to use. Maybe an
253.
▲
by
gcb0
8y ago
check out one called NoRedirect on both chrome and firefox.
254.
▲
by
gcb0
8y ago
site is down now... but I hope it will be honest and just explain that "they did it just so they could do that one demo of tar'ing one process from one machine, 9p'ing it to another box, untar it and the process graphical UI
255.
▲
by
gcb0
8y ago
what did you browsed the web with? or as relevant at the time: how did you communicate via msn/aim/yim/icq? I hope you're not one of those condescending Unix types that only had online interactions on irc :P
256.
▲
by
gcb0
8y ago
You are not wrong (about what is on the standards). But you are being downvoted because everyone who did implement AMP in the real world, did so for the SEO benefits.
257.
▲
by
gcb0
8y ago
I believe you. That's what the fine folks at the IE team did with ajax too, for example. And I am not being ironic, but the line is so thin that I have to point it out either way.
258.
▲
by
gcb0
8y ago
Real use case for this is so Google can poke into context for links shared via services they have no ownership. They got used to know exactly what people share and, much more importantly, what people click on email, thanks to gmail rewritin
259.
▲
by
gcb0
8y ago
amp is a self serving standard. Nowhere in the standard "higher search ranking on google inc" is mentioned as a must have feature. Yet it is the only feature anyone care about when discussing adoption.
260.
▲
by
gcb0
8y ago
(overly ironic) tl;dr "let's rewrite something in this new browser feature because the other browser feature we added last week is not supported anywhere and buggy in chrome"
261.
▲
by
gcb0
8y ago
wouldn't expect such click baity from bbc. > domestic abuser, had a gun-ban for a few years. Police found a gun (which happened to be 3d printed) and while arresting him he claimed to be from the CIA... how is this title better then
262.
▲
by
gcb0
8y ago
"that also depends if you have something to hide" was said of every police state and censorship scheme.
263.
▲
by
gcb0
8y ago
not really. it started with the word "penis" for the original "campaign" but since a single word was obviously ineffective the meme improved.
264.
▲
by
gcb0
8y ago
if you were really blocking all trackers, Captcha would even work. Firefox help page for their new tracker blocking feature says so even.
265.
▲
by
gcb0
8y ago
for google, you are the enemy. not even bots. captcha is google master blow against ad blockers. a regular user, who they have all the info, give them dollars per ad impression. You, with your doNotTrack (ha! that was a joke) and privacy ad
266.
▲
by
gcb0
8y ago
that's good. tor traffic should not leak on the open web. that just diminish tor network and cause headaches to node operators. if you care about all that, run a node without internet exit, and also strive to make your sites available
267.
▲
by
gcb0
8y ago
wonder if someone is collecting actual data instead of listening to udfalkso, the google sales rep here. maybe to save them a few $ from bots and spam (bandwidth and storage is very cheap today) they might be losing new users by the thousan
268.
▲
by
gcb0
8y ago
they stopped using the text because some forum campaign that promoted typing cursewords instead of the unkown word. they probably started showing cursewords on the rendered search highligths on google books. there was a decent write up from
269.
▲
by
gcb0
8y ago
this thread is amusing. so many people on HN should go get their amateur radio licenses and stop comparing a layer 1 radio connection to their layer 7+ they use in the browser.
270.
▲
by
gcb0
8y ago
love the (intentional?) irony that the first 20 something paragraphs say absolutely nothing besides "bezos like longform narrative, and he wrote it in a very short email once".
More ›