gcb0

57 ms·

481.
by gcb0 8y ago
theguardian has updated the news with a full article, this one only have the title and twitters. here's the better link https://www.theguardian.com/world/2018/oct/28/jair-bolsonaro...
482.
by gcb0 8y ago
"regulators under President Donald Trump, the people said, it’s planning to open 400 branches" really? "the people said"? who write like this?
483.
by gcb0 8y ago
most projects on those incubators are there to die a slow death after being abandoned by the group you call "open source corporations"
484.
by gcb0 8y ago
you probably will not be able to complete that sentence without being called racist, xenophobic or both.
485.
by gcb0 8y ago
The articles (and Stalman interviews) happening recently pointed to this situation. Open Source, as adopted currently, is a flawed model that valors corporate protection more than end-user freedom. github is now sourceforge. redhat is now s
486.
by gcb0 8y ago
missing the "in hardware" part? target may be a simple microcontroller or fpga that lacks multiplication.
487.
by gcb0 8y ago
blackberry can limit permissions based on if you are actively using the app or not. I get tons of notifications for whatsapp trying to use microphone/gps/contacts while the screen is off.
488.
by gcb0 8y ago
seems to have helped everyone in this board during yours childhood and teen years, when you could just play games and learn to code, which became most people here trade. but yeah, if you missed that by not being born rich, work until your b
489.
by gcb0 8y ago
> investor isn't there a better substantive for someone betting in a game of chance?
490.
by gcb0 8y ago
his other publications https://dl.acm.org/author_page.cfm?id=81100305105&coll=DL&dl...
491.
by gcb0 8y ago
the point is, the consumer should be able to know what they are paying for. and for batteries, it is measured in Ah capacity. period. Also, you simply cannot call yourself "relatively technical" and still belive the greatest lie o
492.
by gcb0 8y ago
don't forget office suite:gdoc, and conferencing: hangouts/meet/whatever they force down your throat tomorrow. this is specially pernicious as they are actively using it to undermine Firefox in the workplaces. their proprieta
493.
by gcb0 8y ago
people here can't understand sarcasm :) I had a laugh, then got sad. but upvoted you anyway.
494.
by gcb0 8y ago
lets take weigth out of all food packaging too! nobody is a damn nutritionist either! ...the length those fanboy go. sigh. Go on defendind the indefensible and gate keeping your so precious superior technical knowledge that the common man i
495.
by gcb0 8y ago
Let me illustrate the problem; make a web serch for "mah site: https://www.apple.com/" and see how there are zero results (besides forums asking for the capacity of some product's battery, just to be answered
496.
by gcb0 8y ago
Money. If your clients do not care about security updates for older models, and happily buy new models which carry a 300+% profit margin, why on earth would they justify not doing what they are doing. It is money, plain and simple. And this
497.
by gcb0 8y ago
the beauty is that everyone want to do re-attribution, so they can buy cheap and sell expensive. if I send a bid to google with a random browser id, it will assign a new user on the spot (we wont be lucky to match a valid user as in your ex
498.
by gcb0 8y ago
Is that huge switch how it detects it is on your face? seems hugely inconvenient.
499.
by gcb0 8y ago
1. record all network interaction going out of your MRAID adapter, from your few, actual users. 2. replace timestamp and userIDs fields on the network requests you will replay with Math.random() 3. Profit! Seems pretty simple and banal to m
500.
by gcb0 8y ago
a security blog you can only read after enabling javascript for a dozen domains. Nice one google.
501.
by gcb0 8y ago
> taste like the inside of a shoe I had no idea what the author drank, but it certainly wasn't chicha.
502.
by gcb0 8y ago
they will evolve/pivot to a "big data notebook" and monetize on this.
503.
by gcb0 8y ago
wont they made themselves irrelevant? now it's the same price of any itx board. with the same high power profile. for the last 4 years anyone could spend $40 on a itx board with 12v power input, plus $40 for a fully featured ia64 AMD53
504.
by gcb0 8y ago
if true, this the communist version of the Simpsons episode were the capitalist covers the sun
505.
by gcb0 8y ago
sounds like all those people are filtering for is who went to the same university, at around the same time as they did.
506.
by gcb0 8y ago
agree. but also wonder what is the difference if religious or economic.
507.
by gcb0 8y ago
wait, are you now defending a "tax break for the rich, so they can show poor home owners that they are too entitled"?
508.
by gcb0 8y ago
his gains will still be much less than if the company paid more taxes. also it is irrelevant, as every single listed company will benefit from it, making no stock differentiation in price.
509.
by gcb0 8y ago
that State "problem" seems to be solved when they finish moving to a cashless model (like the US) and then you stay at home but can't but absolutely nothing to live on.
510.
by gcb0 8y ago
don't bother. jornalism trying to summarize philosophy... not to mention way off ttopic here. not sure why this is on the front page with only a dozen points.

More ›