gbnwl

9 ms·

91.
by gbnwl 1y ago
It's already been in effect for the past few years. Does it feel like it's inhibited rapid turnover to you?
92.
by gbnwl 1y ago
FTA: “The team showed that indeed they express “D1” receptors for the neuromodulator. Commensurate with the degree of dopamine connectivity“ There are receptors specifically for dopamine on the amygdala neurons. Dopamine molecules are relea
93.
by gbnwl 2y ago
Said comment, so other's don't have to dig around in your history: "Since google, everyone trying replicate this feature... (OpenAI, HF..) It's powerfull yes, so as asking an A.I and let him sythezise all what he fed. I
94.
by gbnwl 2y ago
OK I'll admit I chuckled
95.
by gbnwl 2y ago
Sure, but this doesn't answer my question nor tie into your last comment at all. It's Saturday evening in much of the world, are you sober?
96.
by gbnwl 2y ago
But then they said 250/second when running multiple inference? Again I don't know if their assertions about running multiple inference are correct but why focus on the wrong number instead of addressing the actual claim?
97.
by gbnwl 2y ago
Why are you using 2 seconds? The commenter you are responding to hypothesized being able to do 250/s based on "100 parallel inference at 5 at a time". Not speaking to the validity of that, but find it strange that you ran wit
98.
by gbnwl 2y ago
Which one and in which direction did you rethink? Your comment made me curious so I looked at his posts and he has a one about leaving academia because he wasn't happy in 2022, and a more recent one about rejoining it some months ago.
99.
by gbnwl 2y ago
This is the fourth account you've made in the past hour just to comment on this post.
100.
by gbnwl 2y ago
This isn't really a meaningful prediction unless you define clearly your idea of what being "as intelligent as a precocious child" is, and how you would assess an LLM or any other system against that metric. Though I suppose
101.
by gbnwl 2y ago
That's "efficiency" high, which actually means less compute. The 87.5% score using low efficiency (more compute) doesn't have cost listed.
102.
by gbnwl 2y ago
Well they got 75.7% at $17/task. Did you see that?
103.
by gbnwl 2y ago
Please, before we discuss this further, and I would like to, provide some idea of what would qualify as an "actual effort into AGI" for you.
104.
by gbnwl 2y ago
Well I didn't see a Tsunami but thanks to this thread I do have a few nice live streams of pleasant water views going. Kind of relaxing tbh.
105.
by gbnwl 2y ago
It's back
106.
by gbnwl 2y ago
Everyone is trying to get to AGI, and yes mostly through LLMs for now. You said you don't believe LLMs are capable of ever getting there, so I offered a link showing people are trying other things as well. My point was never "Ever
107.
by gbnwl 2y ago
easily detected by the massive unexplained power consumption Just tell them you're training a new foundational model.
108.
by gbnwl 2y ago
Training LLMs is not the only thing people are trying. They dominate the public attention right now but there are people everywhere trying all kinds of approaches. Here's one from IBM: https://research.ibm.com/topics&#x
109.
by gbnwl 2y ago
There’s huge fears around AGI, but that’s not what people are building. Everyone is trying to build this.
110.
by gbnwl 2y ago
buying it after a major crash has historically been a very good business Even buying it after a major peak (literally every single prior peak) and just holding throughout the crash has been very good business. Agreed that almost no one ca
111.
by gbnwl 2y ago
I ran the numbers some time ago, I figured a realistic max value for 1 BTC would be 500k-1M. Extremely curious about your methodology here. Also I'm not sure how to process "the max value is only 5-10x from current prices so the
112.
by gbnwl 2y ago
Sure but predicting Bitcoin will crash again is like predicting the sun will rise tomorrow, obvious and not a novel or useful prediction. What is your long term prediction of whether/when it will die off and never recover? So far the &
113.
by gbnwl 2y ago
What numbers and what valuation at seed round would indicate to you that they did consider it world changing and disruptive?
114.
by gbnwl 2y ago
Can code using a library that doesn't exist compile? I admit ignorance here.
115.
by gbnwl 2y ago
Interesting that the OP article focuses mostly on just recording activity, where this paper seems focused on electrostimulation by the device itself. Edit: Looks like this is because the original article is talking about this paper, instead
116.
by gbnwl 2y ago
Just because the brain is a single “thing” doesn’t mean it doesn’t have distinct types of memory. Consider looking up “working memory” as it’s probably the best analogue to RAM here.
117.
by gbnwl 2y ago
IIUC it stands for "If I understand correctly"